Ho said, also, " tlie Motion prevailed to supersede the " old Committee of Corrcppondence by a new one of fifty ;" although neither of the three Resolutions of the Caucus contained the slightest allusion to any such supersedure, nor to any other Comnu'ttee or body or person whatever than to the proposed Committee of fifty, which it nominated. lie said of the Meeting at the CofTee-honse, "and the nom- " ination of the Committee wasaccepted, even w ilh the aildition of Isaac "Low as its Chairman, who was more of a loyalist than a patriot;" although, in fact, Isaac Low's name was on the list which had been nominated at the Caucus, against which no opposition was made ; and the only " addition " which was made by the .Meeting was that of Francis Lewis, whose name had been indmled on the original list of the minority, and rejected by the Caucus. The Meeting at the Coffee-house made no attempt to supply the Committee of Fifty-one with a Chairman, in the person of Isaac Low, as Bancroft has stated : Isaac Low wa.-^ called to that place by the Committee itself, at its first Meeting, on Monday, Stay 2.1, as its Mintilet abiimlantly prove. Doctor Sparks, {Life of Gouvenietir itorrit, i., 22,) merged the doings of the Caucus and the Meeting at the Coffee-house, into one mass ; made Isaac Scars the master spirit of all that was done ; and said " the Committee consisted of "a nearly equal number of both parties, but with a preponderance on " the liberal side ; " although the truth wa.s, the friends the Home Government took no part whatever, in either of those meetings ; that both were composed of only those who opposed the Home Government ; that the struggle, in each of the two assemblages, was between cimrticting factions of the latter party ; that, in both, the faction of the aristocratic conser\ative element of the party outvoted and defeated the faction representing, or pretending to represent, the unfranchised ma.sses ; that the Committee contained a large proportion of those who belonged, at that time, to the aristocratic conservative faction of the party ; and that it is not known, nor is it suppose<l, that a single person was named on the Committee, who was not, at that time, opposed to the Colonial policy of the Home Government.