- The Resolution of the Committee in New York, on whicli that reply was based, is in these words: "Orderei>, That the Committee of Boston " he re>|uested to give this Committee the Names of the Persons who " constitute the Committee of Correspondence at Boston ; that they have " made a mistake in answering this Committee's letter, which mentioned " not a word of a Suspension of Trade, which they say we have so " wisely defined, as we leave that measure entirely to the Congress, and " we sliall readily agree to any nieaaure they shall adopt."

It is very evident tliat the suspicions of the Committee of New York were aroused by the eviileut trickery of the Committee of Boston, presented in its reply to the letter of the former, dated the twenty-third of May ; and that, for that reason, it desireil to learn the names of those with whom it was corres|H>uding -- their characters and standing could, then, be ascertained through other means.

* Copy of the letter, appended to the Miiuile* of the Vommiitee of CorrtipoudeiKe of Snr Yurk, " New-York, June C, 1774."

Massachusetts * and to the Committees of Correspondence in the several Colonies, since the rece|)tion ot the Boston Port-Bill, were not, as is now well known, really as unanimous, in favor of a " Suspension ot "Trade," as the Committee had unblushingly pretended-- indeed, with a few unimportant exceptions, the proi)osal to make Boston the only subject of consideration, tliroughout the Continent, and to suspend all the internal industries and, with the exception ot Smuggling, all the Commerce of all the Colonies, only for the special benefit of that one Town, regardless ot the more direct and substantial grievances which were sustained by other Towns and other Colonies, and regardless, also, of the very serious consequences, throughout the entire Continent and elsewhere, ot such a general and indiscriminate "Suspension ot " Trade " as had been proi)osed, and that, too, at the expense of a Congress of the Continent, which the Committee in New York had proposed and insisted on, in which all the grievances of all the Towns and Colonies could be considered, and remedies therefor be duly provided, had met with no f&\or whatever ; and the audacious leaders of the revolutionary populace, in Boston, as well as the Town itself, were not slow in receding, with more agility than candor, from that high and untenable position which they had occupied, in the proceedings of the Caucus held at Faneuil-Hall, on the twelfth of May, in the proceedings of the Town of Boston, at the same place, on the fol-