The result was probably foreseen by the Petitioners and their successful candidate -- why should the carefully expressed will of filty-uine respectable men, declared in conformity with the published terms of the Congress itself, be permitted to stand in the way of a Van Cortlandt, the latter with nothing else than two e.r-parfe Affidavits to sustain the evidently ridiculous charge of wrong-doitig in the successful canilidate? and why, also, should those other successful candidates who had, also, been elected by the same great majority and at the same time, without even the semblance of an accusation against either of them, be permitted to receive their Commissions? It was true, that the latter had not been known to have spoken disrespectfully of either the Axsodfttion or of the Congress : it was true, that they had received nearly five-sixths of the votes which were Ciist: it was true, that the Election had been held under the inspection of the proper Committee: it was true, that every requirement of the Congress's

' Charles Tylor,

John Devoe,

' Miiitin I'ost.

Jacob Post,

' .liiiues Muiiio,

Henry Brown,

' AiitliJ Alliuie,

Henrey Taylor,

' Kilwani U.vor,

Authoney Archer,

' li(Mijauiin Farrington,

Basal Archer,

* William Uose,

Thomas Oakley,

' Hour} pri'slier.

Jonathan Fowler,

* Thouius Furington,

his

Abm X I'ost,

' Jnniea Kii h,

mark

" Gilbert Brown,

hid

liig

Dennis X Poet,

'Tlionios X Tii>pit,

murk

mark,

his

" Samuel Laurence,

William X I'ost,

' tliunuw Merrell,

mark

' Samuel Williaiiia,

Robert Brown,