The Governor of Connecticut having, meanwhile, taken no notice whatever of the letter which the Provincial Congres.s had written to him, in the preceding December, on the 8th of March, 1771), the latter informed the Delegation from New York in the Continental ('ongress, of that fact, (Jourmd of the 1\i>riucial Conyrem, "Die \ eneris, "10 ho., A.M., March 8, 1771) ;") but there seems to have been no .iction, on that subject, in the former body, then or at any other time.

HISTORY OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY.

him and carried him from his home ; and he was thus held by that law-defying gang of ruffians, in one of the Capital-towns of Connecticut, in which the Legislature was, then, in session, without the slightest attempt, by the legally constituted Government of that Colony, to interfere, either for the rescue of the captive or for the vindication of the Law of the land, which had been indisputably violated by those who held him. As has been stated, the captive was not permitted to hold a free intercourse with his friends ; the use of pen, ink, and paper, unless for the purpose of writing to his family, was interdicted; and his correspondence with his family was subjected to examination by his captors. As a matter of favor, however, he was permitted to memorialize the General Assembly of the Colony within which he was held in captivity, although that Assembly had been dissolved by Proclamation of theGo.vernor,six days previously; and, because that Memorial is a portion of the revolutionary literature of Westchester-county, to say nothing of its importance as an authority in history, a place for it may be properly found in the text of this narrative.^ It was in the following words: