History of the Indian Tribes of Hudson's River
that
be
had
to them by sending up a sloop, indicating that in the summer at In the least they had a representative position on the Hudson. treaty of 1745, Sessekemick represented
them and appears to
have acted under the counsel of Oritany.
In the sale of Staten
island, Taghkospemo
1 '*
I,
appeared
Oratum, am sagamore, and sole
as
their
ing on the main land over against the Deed to Edward Isle of Manhattans."
March
is
der Cappellen, 1659.
proprietor of Hackingsack, lying and be-
Cove, Oct. 5, 1664. Staten island, by the Indians called Eghquaous, appears to have been owned in partnership by the Raritans, the HackDeed to Van insacks and the Tappans.
sachem, and there
Deed
to
25,
Hans Diderick and others, 1676.
Oritany,
who was
then living, had no part in this deed. 4 " Within the first reach, on the western bank of the river, where the land is low, there dwells a nation of savages, named Tappans." De Laet y Nc<w York Hist. Soc. Co//., idseries,!, 298.
THE INDIAN TRIBES
much earlier date. Their which Tappan bay, probably bounded their on the Hudson. possessions North of the Tappans and inhabiting 6th. The Haverstraw s. evidence that his sachemship had
name
survives in
a territory, the westward boundaries of which are not clearly defined, were the Haverstraws, so called by the Dutch, but
whose aboriginal name appears to have been lost. 2 They took some part in the early wars, but would seem to have been absorbed by the Tappans after the supremacy of the English. Stony point was the northern limit of their territory, as indi cated by the deed to Governor in the