History of the Indian Tribes of Hudson's River
of population and treaty intercourse under the Dutch, they sub sequently added materially to the disintegration of the river much of that character of independent
tribes, and gave to them
cantons which has been assumed as representing their political From this disintegration the Five Nations escaped, with
status.
results to their consolidated
recognition which cannot be too
That they would have been similar sufferers
highly estimated.
had they been similarly situated, the records of the negotiations with them after the war of the revolution, are a sufficient indi Considered only as a whole and treated as a whole,
cation.
they were a power ; but treated with as independent tribes they were shorn of their strength. With them the. of the history
Mahicans and the Lenapes repeated itself with fearful emphasis.
The policy adopted by the English was liberal and reasonable, and contributed at sioners
in
1744,
the
least to the
chiefs
"We
used
the
are -united following language: with the Six Nations in one common
temporary improvement of the covenant, and this is the belt which the token of that covenant."
is
THE INDUN TRIBES
condition of the Indjans.
The frictions which had
prevailed
during the Dutch administration were very largely removed by a law declaring that "no purchase of lands from the Indians,
" esteemed a day of March, 1665," should be good title without leave first had and obtained from the governor and after leave so obtained ; " that purchasers should bring be " fore the governor " the sachem or of lands which right owner