History of the Indian Tribes of Hudson's River
the confederacy in the transaction, and assuming that they were offended at the growing power of Teedyuscung. Such an interpretation does not correspond with The Indians were the apparent facts. Iroquois it is true, but it is also true that
(Fort Laurens) of "The person on small-pox in 1778. whom, by lineal descent, the station of head-chief of the nation devolved, being
they were Senecas or
Pushis, alias Large Cat, and Tetepachksi The young king officiated in his stead."
those
engaged in
stirring up hostilities in the west.
Heck-
" Fearing that he might ewelder says not fall into their measures of joining in a new war against the English, they perhaps concerted the plan of destroying :
him."
Nothing
was
ever
positively
his efforts to keep his people neutral. at Tuscorawas
He
died
yet
was
years, the
young in
Gelellmand,
alias
surviving chiefs
Killbuck, Machingive
killed in the massacre of peaceable
Indians
1781.
by Williamson at Pittsb'urg, in Hcckeivclder's Narrative, 153,
193, 198, etc.
OF HUDSON'S RIPER.
but the immediate participants in the massacre anticipated their arrival and
withdrew
to
Tioga, while the Moravian Indians,
who had taken no part in the transaction, removed to Gnadenhiitten.
Failing to reach the guilty, a band of lawless whites
determined to punish the innocent, and with a hatred born of the pernicious teachings of Church, banded together to exter
minate the whole Indian race, " that the saints might possess
Sixty in number, these maddened zealots fell upon CanestogoesJ a small clan of Onelda dependents residing