History of the Indian Tribes of Hudson's River
contemporaries, KAELCOP and SEWACKENAMO of the Minsis^ WYANDANCE, of the Montauks, and ORITANY of the Hackinsacks, by
the stirring scenes in which they were participants. definite rejlrds came to be
Even as late as 1710, when more
is no preservation of the lines of kings, nor is there positive identification of the Mahlcan and Iroquois sachems
written, there
who then visited England.
True, it
is
said that
HENDRIK of
the Mohawks, was one of the latter, and that ELOW-OH-KAOM,
of the Mahicans, left a daughter who became the wife of
UM-
PACHENEE, a chief subsequently known to the missionaries of Stockbridge ; but as a rule, the declaration is not the mere creation of the poet SPRAGUE, that
"The doomed Indian leaves' behind no trace, To save his own or serve another race, With his frail breath his peftver has passed away, His deeds, his thoughts, are buried with* his clay. His heraldry is but a broken bow, His history but a tale of wrong and woe, His very name must be a blank/'
HUDSON RIVER INDIANS.
On the part of the Lenapes the name of TAMANY, or TAMANED has beerf preserved in a halo of traditionary glory. He was one of their sachems or kings, and lived possibly as late as 1680. Heckewelder says: "The fame of this great man extended even among the whites, who fabricated numerous legends respecting him, which I never heard, however, from the mouth of an Indian, and therefore believe to be fabulous."
He is said to have been a resident of the present county of Bucks, in Pennsylvania, and that he was buried near a spring about three and a half miles west of Doylestown, in that county.