History of the Indian Tribes of Hudson's River
that in the observation of that writer of the fact that they fre " a dozen things and even more by one name," quently called
he had simply failed to note the inflections which constituted But notwithstanding an important principle of the language. the publication of Eliot's grammar in 1666, and the observations of the Jesuit and Moravian priests, it was not until 1819 that
Du Ponceau, after a thorough comparison of the Writings of predecessors, was enabled " That the American
his
to
announce the proposition
:
languages in general use are rich in words
and
in
grammatical forms, and that,
in their complicated con
struction, the greatest order, method, and regularity prevail." It remained, however, for subsequent writers, and especially for
Gallatin x and \
Schoolcraft,
to
A Synopis of the Indian Tribes 'within
the United States east of the
Rocky Mounelucidate fully the grammatical tains, etc., by Hon.
Albert Gallatin, 1836.
APPENDIX.
structure of the languages and define the characteristic features
of the several dialects.
According to these writers there were but two generic Indian languages, the Algonquin and the Iroquois ; but these two were groups with distinctive charac
divided into tribal dialects and
While each Iroquois tribe had its dialect, the generic
teristics.
language, as spoken by the Five Nations of New York, differed many respects from that spoken by the southern and western
in
The Algonquin was represented
Iroquois families.
by equally
Edwards says that the Mabi" can was spoken u by all the Indians throughout New England ; that though each tribe had " a different dialect," the language of the Mablcans was " the same." Yet the