History of the Indian Tribes of Hudson's River
among which there is a natural connection. tures of the principle.
All the other fea
language seem
to be subordinate to that general view has been attained by various
The object in
means of the same tendency and often blended together
:
a
multitude of inflections properly so called ; a still greater num ber of compound words, sometimes formed by the coalescence
of primitive words not materially altered,' more generally by the union of many such words in a remarkably abbreviated form,
and
numerous
either
particles,
significative,
or
the
original
meaning of which has been lost, prefixed, added as terminations, body of the word." An extreme illustration furnished by Mather, in the compound phrase of this principle " Kummogkodonattoottummooetiteaongannunnonash," which is or inserted in the
is
" our Edwards illustrates it in a presumed to imply, question." " If a man hold out his hand simpler form in the Mahican. an Indian to
to
" knish"
know the name, he may receive the answer
thy hand ;
he is told " nnisk"
but if he touches the hand of the Indian^ and in either case he will infer ;
my hand
that he has received the
there
is
no such word
in
Indian word for hand, simply, when the language." Schoolcraft, in his
explains this principle
more fully and defines the idioms
and structure of the language.
From this treatise the annexed
treatise,
synopsis is made, presuming that those having occasion to do so,
" An
Essay on the Grammatical Structure of the Algonquin Language"