justify what hee had said.

Whereupon Mr Antill took out the execution against him (he not being him y e like message as before with the same effect

then of the Council) but before the serving sent

whereupon the execution was served Larkms Case

As for Larkins case I refer to the orders of Council herewith sent

And as for the Kings concerns going in a right channel I am sure they never can where he has powers.

As for desiring a list of his Maty 8 Quit- Rents @ my denying it to him, its wholly untrue

for he has a book with an acct of all the Quit-Rents that then were to bee found

records of Patents kept in the Secretarys

office, which I caused Coker to

mentioned in the

draw out on purpose for

him Smith kept the key of the Granary @ what corn I received for my own use or the use of the @ it was shown to Mr Smith where I gave credit to the King for

Garrison was taken out by Coker it in

my books.

Afterwards finding that Santen gave no credit to the King for what corn came into

@ gave to James Larkens with order to him to give to Smith that he might enter receipts for what should bee brought in @ to give an account of the Granary I took the key from Smith

it

it

it

upon the books

Hee does Judge Palmer @ Mr Graham wrong for they are psons look't upon by the Council as fittest for those employments they are in, viz. Palmer Judge @ Graham attorney for the King, And *Mr jaGra- if Mr Santen would speak truth he must needs say they both have been very serviceable for the King in the advancement of his Revenue, @ that they still continue with their utmost endeavors soe to bee And though their way of living is by the law, yet their management has @ such other mild courses that were there was ten actions formerly there is