Home / Dawson, Henry B. Westchester County, New York, During the American Revolution. Morrisania, NY: (privately printed by the author), 1886. / Passage

Westchester County, New York, During the American Revolution

Dawson, Henry B. Westchester County, New York, During the American Revolution. Morrisania, NY: (privately printed by the author), 1886. 350 words

Long-Island, Jan, 14," published in Rivington's New York Gazetteer, No. 92, New-York, Thursday, January 19, 1775; Letter to the same, dated, "Newtown on Long Island, Jan. 12, "1775," published in the same issue of that paper ; Letter to the same from Ulster-county, New-York, published in the same paper, No. 93, New- York, Thursday, January 26, 1775 ; Letter to the same, from Duchesscounty, published in the same paper, No. 95, New York, Thursday, February 9, 1775 ; etc.

WESTCHESTEK COUNTY.

mittee should condemn, for having violated that Association, in order " that, thenceforth, the parties to the " said Association should respectively break off all deal- " ings with him or her" -- in more modern phraseology, in order that the alleged offender, whether guilty or innocent of any violation of law, on the mere condemnation of a local Committee, on whom individual animosity or local prejudice might exercise a greater power than either justice or equity could control, might be promptly boycotted, in all his or her business relations, and, thereby, be involved in disaster and ruin. At the same time, John Jay, Peter T. Curtenius,, Isaac Low, and James Duane were appointed to prepare a Circular Letter to the different Counties, recommending them, also, to appoint similar "Com- "mittees of Inspection," "agreeably to the provisions "of the eleventh resolve of the Congress." 1

" Some difficulties having arisen relative to the Ad- " vertisement published by the Committee, for choos- " ing a Committee of Inspection "--in other words, the handful of professional politicians who assumed to represent the unfranchised Mechanics and Working-men of the City, having repudiated the limitations imposed by the Congress, and insisted that the votes of the great body of the inhabitants, as well as those of the Freeholders and Freemen, of the City, should be received, in the election of the proposed Committee of Inspection -- an interview, between the leaders of those plebeian and revolutionary claimants of political authority and their aristocratic and conservative neighbors of the Committee of Correspondence, was invited by the latter ; 2 and, on the fol-