The result was probably foreseen by the Petitioners and their successful candidate -- why should the carefully expressed will of fifty-nine respectable men, declared in conformity with the published terms of the Congress itself, be permitted to stand in the way of a Van Cortlandt, the latter with nothing else than two ex-parte Affidavits to sustain the evidently ridiculous charge of wrong-doing in the successful candidate? and why, also, should those other successful candidates who had, also, been elected by the same great majority and at the same time, without even the semblance of an accusation against either of them, be permitted to receive their Commissions ? It was true, that the latter had not been known to have spoken disrespectfully of either the Association or of the Congress : it was true, that they had received nearly five-sixths of the votes which were cast: it was true, that the Election had been held under the inspection of the proper Committee : it was true, that every requirement of the Congress's

"Charles Tylor, "Martin Post, "James Munro, "Anthy Allaire, " Edward Ryer, "Benjamin Farrington, " William Rose, "Henry presher, " Thomas Farington, " Tsac Postt, " James Rich, "Gilbert Brown,

his "Thomas X Tippit,

mark, "Samuel Laurence, " thomas Merrell, " Samuel Williams, " Fredrick Brown, "Israel Underbill, " David Oakley, Jun*, " Joseph Oakley, Jun r , "George Crawford, "Moses Oakley, "Abraham Rich, " Mathious Archer,

his "Ez* X Brown, mark,

his "Abraham X Asten,

mark, " Robert Farrington,