Trustees map 2026 grant strategy after snow budget shatters
Croton's snow removal budget was shattered by back-to-back winter storms, with overtime alone roughly tripling its allocation. In response, trustees began mapping a 2026 grant strategy that includes a potential New York Forward work group and a new Friends of Croton Parks nonprofit to boost park funding.
✓ Verified against official minutes⚠ Predates our automated verification gate
An early article, drafted by AI before our automated verification gate existed. It has not been machine-checked against the meeting record and may contain errors.
Published under the editorial responsibility of
Matthew Broudy,
who is accountable for every article on this site.
=== EXECUTIVE BRIEF ===
• Village manager reported snow overtime at approximately $200,000 against a $60,000 budget, with salt funds also exhausted
• Budget amendment to cover snow costs will be deferred until late March or early April
• Board discussed forming a New York Forward grant work group to prepare for an expected October application round
• Friends of Croton Parks, sponsored by Westchester Parks Foundation, will soon launch as a nonprofit partner for park grant applications
• Public meeting on Gueva Park architectural drawings scheduled for Monday night
• Pedestrian bridge assessment recommended as next priority after Half Moon Bay Bridge work concludes
Croton's snow budget didn't just get a dusting this winter — it got buried.
Village officials confirmed at Tuesday's work session that snow removal overtime has hit roughly $200,000 this season against a budgeted $60,000. The salt budget is also tapped out. That's before factoring in the latest blizzard, which dumped about two feet of snow and kept DPW crews working 31 straight hours from Sunday afternoon through Monday night.
Mayor Brian Pugh and Village Manager Bryan Healy during discussion of the snow removal budget overage at the Board Of Trustees meeting.
"Before this storm, we were approximately 200,000 in snow over time," the village manager told the board, responding to a question from a trustee who noted the adopted snow removal budget sat at $164,000 total. "We are certainly not unique. Every community in Westchester is dealing with the same problem." 5:17▶
The village manager said he plans to wait until late March or early April to request a budget amendment, preferring to move the money all at once rather than keep coming back to the board. He stressed the village has adequate cash flow thanks to revenues coming in higher than expected — it's a bookkeeping fix, not a crisis.
A state of emergency declaration, it turns out, doesn't bring funding. It simply lets the village skip the usual bidding and quoting requirements when renting equipment mid-storm. Federal FEMA money could become available if Westchester County secures a disaster declaration, but that would likely cover broken equipment rather than overtime.
One trustee praised the village's storm communications as "excellent" and noted the remarkable job residents and business owners did clearing sidewalks. Another pointed out that while Croton didn't dodge the snow, it dodged power outages, downed trees, and flooding — a small mercy.
The board then pivoted to a long presentation from Valerie Monastra of Nelson Pope and Voorhees on 2026 grant opportunities. The takeaway: Croton keeps applying for park grants but keeps getting outscored because of demographics beyond the village's control.
The big prize on the horizon is New York Forward, a state downtown revitalization program. Croton applied last year and was rejected, with the state signaling that its multiple "quasi downtowns" didn't fit the program's preference for geographically concentrated projects that catalyze private investment. The board discussed forming a dedicated work group to start preparing for the expected October round rather than scrambling at the last minute.
One trustee floated the idea of a youth and senior community center in North Riverside, near the pedestrian bridge, as a potential New York Forward project. Monastra cautioned that the program favors shovel-ready projects with existing plans and cost estimates.
There was good news on the park funding front: a Friends of Croton Parks group, sponsored by the Westchester Parks Foundation, is launching soon. That nonprofit partner status — often required by state park grants — has been a missing piece for Croton. The village will also resubmit its Gueva Park application for NY Parks funding in round two.
The 30-year-old pedestrian bridge, gifted to the village by the DOT, will need a structural assessment once Half Moon Bay Bridge work wraps up. As for the Picture Tunnel, ownership remains unresolved — but it's lasted a century, so officials are hoping for another 25 years.
What to watch for:
Gueva Park public meeting: Monday night, where architectural drawings will be shared
Sign up for Everbridge alerts at crotononhudson.org under the Citizen Action Center — only 2,770 of 8,300 residents are enrolled
Snow removal in business districts targeted for completion by Friday
New York Forward work group formation expected in coming weeks
●Financial Audit Accepted: The Board received the FY2025 audit report from PKF O'Connor Davies, resulting in an "unmodified (clean) opinion"—the highest possible rating.
●Revenue Performance: The Village generated nearly $23 million in actual revenues, about $1.1 million more than budgeted and a 4% increase over the prior year.
●Expenditure Increase: Spending rose approximately 5% to $20.3 million, driven primarily by a $400,000 increase in health insurance costs and rising retirement benefits.
●Debt Strategy: The Village transferred nearly $4 million from the fund balance to the Capital Projects Fund to pay for improvements upfront rather than issuing debt, saving on interest and issuance fees.
●OPEB Liability: Auditors highlighted a $39 million liability for Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB), a non-cash accounting figure that does not impact the day-to-day budget or bond rating due to state legal restrictions.
Infrastructure Fails and Budget Plans Collide: Croton Village Weighs Costs of Aging Water Mains and Winter Overtime
●Water Main Emergency: Village crews repaired a catastrophic failure on Olcott Avenue caused by cast iron pipes installed in 1908.
●Snow Removal Budget: The Board proposed a $68,000 increase for snow removal and overtime, citing a "winter from hell" and rising labor rates.
●Sanitation Costs: Budgeted a $12,000 increase for refuse collection due to rising Westchester County tipping fees.
●Recycling Revenue: Village officials noted that dog license revenue fully funds animal control, while recycling revenue helps offset sanitation costs.
●Building Maintenance: Decreased the public buildings maintenance budget by $7,550 to save funds for an upcoming engineering department renovation.
●DPW Air Quality: Established a five-year cycle for duct cleaning across municipal buildings, including the firehouses and DPW facility.
●Traffic Safety: Added $1,500 to the traffic control budget for rising costs of street signs and potential bike infrastructure.
●Contingency Planning: Acknowledged vulnerability to fuel price spikes in the flat fuel budget, with contingency funds as a backstop.
Port Chester Saved $734,000. It Also Lost $490,000. Croton Was Paying Attention.
●Board directed Village Manager to revise CGR court study scope to include police input and public participation
●Agreed committee chairs must be village residents; majority of members must be residents
●Set June 1 deadline for one-committee-per-person rule implementation
●Student members to be classified as 'interns' pending formal guidelines
●Renamed 'Compliance and Enforcement' section to 'Compliance and Oversight'
Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.AI-assisted experimental site — may contain errors. Corrections
Community Discussion
Be the first to comment on this story.
Sent to the editor for review
This is what you asked us to forward to the Village Board:
An editor reads it first. Once it goes, your comment here will show a ✓ Forwarded to the Village Board mark — that is your confirmation.