The Village Board discussed creating a public survey to guide the 2026-27 budget, aiming to distinguish between fixed costs and discretionary spending. Officials emphasized that while resident input will be valued, the survey is advisory, not a binding vote on tax dollars.
⚠This article has not yet been verified against the official meeting minutes. Details may contain errors. See our corrections log for more information.
▶Key Actions & Decisions
●Village Manager Bryan Healy directed to draft a "Budget Priorities Survey" based on models from Timmins, Canada.
●Board requested a one-page "budget primer" accompany the survey to explain the difference between Village, School, and Town taxes.
●Draft survey to be presented to the Board for review at a January work session.
●Board discussed potentially collaborating with the Police Advisory Committee to avoid "survey fatigue."
●Trustees debated asking residents to rank hypothetical spending (e.g., new recreation vs. tax relief).
CROTON-ON-HUDSON – As the village prepares to draft the 2026-27 budget, the Board of Trustees is exploring ways to cut through the noise and hear directly from residents about their spending priorities. At a work session on December 4, the board discussed launching a "Budget Priority Survey" to gauge public opinion on how tax dollars should be allocated.
The Board of Trustees in session during discussion of a budget priority survey for the 2026-27 budget.
The discussion comes as the board grapples with the reality that while residents often have strong opinions on taxes, a significant portion of the village budget is already spoken for before the board even opens a spreadsheet.
Village Manager Bryan Healy explained that while the administration looks to engage the public annually, a survey would need to be carefully designed to manage expectations.
"There's also things that actually could be impacted... we would just be dealing with more the smaller subset of the budget that is actually that we actually have the power to move the funds as the board deems fit," Healy said. [source][1:07]
Healy estimated that approximately 40% of the budget could be considered "discretionary" or movable, though he noted that "discretionary" is a loose term. The majority of funds are tied up in non-negotiable contractual costs such as employee salaries, benefits, LOSAP (Length of Service Award Program) for the fire department, and police pension systems.
"Unless we break the contracts, those are staying how they are," Healy said. [source][2:32]Clarifying the Tax Pie
A major theme of the evening was the need for public education. Board members emphasized that a common source of confusion for residents is the distinction between village taxes and school taxes, which make up the lion's share of a property tax bill.
Mayor Brian Pugh championed the inclusion of a "budget primer" alongside the survey to explain these mechanics.
"We definitely want to have maybe a one page budget primer on there so folks understand what the budget is. We're not the school," Pugh said. [source][4:12] "Here's the budget. Right? Like that education point of... where does 75% of your taxes is actually school tax."
The Board of Trustees in session during discussion of a budget priority survey for residents.
Village Attorney Joshua Subin agreed, noting that confusion often arises because residents receive tax bills from multiple entities. "I always see confusion on the public's part as to the percent of the budget that is the village as opposed to the school as opposed to the town," Subin said. [source][10:24]Not a Plebiscite
While the board wants resident input, Mayor Pugh was clear that the survey would function as a guide rather than a direct mandate.
"We want to say... that a survey is not a plebiscite. We're not asking... we can't make the decisions on the budget that way, although that can influence our decisions," Pugh said. [source][5:05]
Pugh added that the survey is intended to give the board a "headwind" of public opinion before they sit down to finalize the budget details. "We have to make the decisions essentially at this table when our sleeves rolled up when we're looking at a 300 page draft," he said. [source][5:27]Ranking Priorities
The board spent significant time debating how to structure the questions to get useful data. Trustees noted that surveys from other municipalities, such as Tucson, were less relevant due to size differences, though the example of Timmins, a smaller community in Canada, offered a promising template.
Trustees discussed the pros and cons of "forced rank" questions, where residents must prioritize one item over another, rather than selecting multiple options.
"If you had something with 20 different options, the number one option might have 12% that might win in a landslide. But that's useless, honestly, data," Pugh said. [source][7:33]The Board of Trustees in session during discussion of the budget priority survey.
The board also wrestled with how to frame hypothetical spending scenarios, such as asking residents if they would prefer a hypothetical $100,000 be spent on new recreation programs or returned to the fund balance to lower taxes.
The board directed Village Manager Healy to prepare a draft survey using the Timmins example as a model. The draft is expected to be returned to the board for review at a work session in January.
Source documents:
Coverage of the Board of Trustees Work Session meeting on 2025-12-04,
Village of Croton-on-Hudson, NY.
· Read full transcript
This article was drafted by our automated AI newsroom from the official meeting
transcript, then checked by an AI editor and an automated fact-verification gate.
Quotes link to source video timestamps for verification.
Read our editorial policy.
🔍Ask Croton
Have a question about this story? Search across meeting transcripts, village history, and municipal code.
Related Board of Trustees Work Session Meetings
execute an agreement with OMNIA Partners, Public Sector, Inc. for the cooperative purchasing of supplies and equipment.; Review of Proposed Legislation to Create a Rental Unit Registry.; Discussion on the Addition of Alternate Members to the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals. — plus 2 mo...
●Awarded towing contract to CNC Towing Inc. dba Luposello Auto Body (Resolution 153-2026, 4-0, Nicholson absent)\n- Appropriated $2,000 from sustainability trust account for BESS consultant (4-0, Nicholson absent)\n- Directed grant consultant to pursue three CFA grants: water mains (Harrison St/Sunset Trail), Gouveia Park design, salt shed relocation\n- Advanced animal/fowl code rewrite with 25-foot setbacks in RA-5 and 50-foot setbacks elsewhere\n- Agreed to convert HEART Committee from standing to ad hoc committee\n- Directed local law for daytime business-district parking during snow events
Community Discussion
0 comments
Be the first to comment on this story.
Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.
Community Discussion
0 commentsBe the first to comment on this story.