Court Proposal Memo
resolution
1 page
From the meeting:
Board Of Trustees — 2026-03-11
· our coverage →
Agenda item: Proposed Resolutions — Consider authorizing the Village Manager to accept the proposal from CGR of Rochester, New York, to conduct an efficiency study of the Village Justice Court in the amount of $19,750.
Resolution, 1 page. Attached to agenda item: “Proposed Resolutions — Consider authorizing the Village Manager to accept the proposal from CGR of Rochester, New York, to conduct an efficiency study of the Village Justice Court in the amount of $19,750.”
Retrieved 2026-04-15 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
Croton-on-Hudson Court Operations - Option A
Croton-on-Hudson Court Operations - Option B
Croton-on-Hudson Court Operations - Option C
Operational Needs memo
Resolution 57-2026 CGR Court Review
Extracted text
To:
From:
Date:
March 10, 2026
Re:
Updated Proposal for Court Study
Following the recent discussion by the Village Board at the February 25, 2026, work session, I met
twice with Kieran Bezila of CGR to see if the proposal for the Village Justice Court efficiency study
could be further refined to reduce the cost and provide information on a more condensed timeline.
As a reminder, the original proposal (“Option A”) had a scope of work that included conducting
interviews with court staff, key village personnel, users of the court such as defense attorneys and
appropriate town officials to gather key data. The team at CGR would then provide a number of
options for the Village Board to consider in regards to the efficiency of court operations, up to and
including the potential for consolidation. The cost for Option A was set at $37,500.
The second proposal (“Option B”) was formulated after my first meeting with CGR. It split the
original scope of work into two phases. Option B covers phase one, which would involve interviewing
key staff members and collecting baseline data. Phase one would be completed by mid-May, if
approved tonight, allowing the Village Board to review the information collected and decide whether
it would be beneficial to move onto phase two, which would include exploration/modeling of various
options for the court. The cost for Option B was set at $26,500, including an on-site visit to conduct
interviews and collect data. There is also an option that does not include the on-site visit for a total
cost of $23,500.
After further discussion with CGR, a third proposal (“Option C”) was developed that limited the scope
of work to examining quantitative and fiscal matters of the court in order to evaluate the budgetary/tax
implications of a hypothetical court consolidation. This work would be done remotely and would be
followed, if desired by the Board, by a phase two that would include exploration/modeling of various
options for the court. The cost for Option C was set at $19,750.
Option A had a project timeline of approximately 12 weeks, while Options B and C would be
completed in eight weeks. Please let me know if you have further questions.
Mayor
Brian Pugh
Trustees
Stacey Nachtaler
Nora Moriarty Nicholson
Len Simon
Maria F. Slippen
Village Manager
Bryan T. Healy
Village Treasurer
Genette Toone
Village Clerk
Pauline DiSanto
Village Engineer
Vincent Salanitro, P.E.
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.