November 22nd Memo from Planning Board Memo re Dispensary Application
application
1 page
Meeting: portal event 906 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: Correspondence — Memo from Planning Board re: Feedback on Traffic & Parking Assessment for Potential Cannabis Dispensary at 440 South Riverside Avenue
Application, 1 page. Attached to agenda item: “Correspondence — Memo from Planning Board re: Feedback on Traffic & Parking Assessment for Potential Cannabis Dispensary at 440 South Riverside Avenue”
Retrieved 2026-04-15 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
Draft Letter to OCM (Revised)
OCM Email Confirmation
OCM Extension Letter 002 R
Viridian Valley Traffic and Parking Assessment 111223
Extracted text
Members
JOHN GHEGAN
GEOFFREY HAYNES
STEVEN KRISKY
EVA THADDEUS
Attorney
LINDA WHITEHEAD
Village Engineer
DANIEL O’CONNOR, P.E.
TO:
Mayor Pugh and the Board of Trustees
FROM: Robert Luntz, Chairman of the Planning Board
RE: Feedback on Traffic & Parking Assessment for Potential Cannabis Dispensary at 440
South Riverside Avenue
DATE: November 22nd, 2023
At the request of the Village Board, at its regularly scheduled meeting on November 21st 2023,
the Planning Board of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson reviewed the Traffic and Parking
Assessment prepared by Swans Engineering, PLLC dated 11/12/23 for a Potential Cannabis
Dispensary at 440 South Riverside Avenue.
Applicant TJMJR LLC, by its principal Thomas Moore, Jr., Attorney Andrew Schriever and Traffic
Engineer Erica Swansen presented the findings of the Traffic and Parking Assessment to the
Planning Board which, in summary, were that the opening of the proposed cannabis dispensary
would not significantly impact the ShopRite parking lot or the traffic to the parking lot. The
study also accounted for increased vehicular traffic during The Blaze. The applicant assured the
Planning Board that they would discourage patrons from parking in front of the dispensary
when picking up a pre-placed order.
The Planning Board discussed existing vehicle and pedestrian traffic flow in the shopping center
with the applicant and their attorney and engineer and there was a consensus that we could
work together during any future application to the Planning Board for a change of use approval,
etc. to further review existing and future conditions and recommend some suggestions to
improve vehicle and pedestrian safety and flow in the shopping center.
The Planning Board is not opposed to the proposed cannabis dispensary and feel it is an
appropriate use in the shopping center. There is also a thought that after the initial curiosity
wears off, patrons may take advantage of the proposed delivery option, which will reduce traffic
at the dispensary.
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.