46 OPRN DRAFT Resolution 7.22.25
resolution
1 page
Meeting: portal event 1069 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: NEW BUSINESS — Joseph Carlisle & Nancy Larsen, owners -46 Old Post Road North--Located in a RA-5 Residential District and designated on the Tax Maps of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson as Section 78.08 Block 5 Lot 1. Request for a front yard variance and side yard variance from Village Zoning Code Section 230-33 to legalize 1949 and 1979 additions to the primary structure.
Resolution, 1 page. Attached to agenda item: “NEW BUSINESS — Joseph Carlisle & Nancy Larsen, owners -46 Old Post Road North--Located in a RA-5 Residential District and designated on the Tax Maps of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson as Section 78.08 Block 5 Lot 1. Req”
Retrieved 2026-04-15 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
1966 Survey
46 Old Post Rd N documentation 2025
46 Old Post Road Application 2025 Redacted
Extracted text
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, Joseph Carlisle & Nancy Larsen, owners, have applied to the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson for a front yard variance and side yard variance from Village Zoning
Code Section 230-33 for the legalization of 1949 and 1979 additions to the primary structure. 46 Old Post Road
North is located in a RA-5 Residential District and designated on the Tax Maps of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson
as Section 78.08 Block 5 Lot 1.
This proposed action is considered a Type II Action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)
therefore, no Negative Declaration is required.
A public hearing having been held after due notice, this Board, after reviewing the application and viewing the
premises and neighborhood concerned, finds:
1. □ No undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood nor detriment to nearby properties will
be produced by the granting of the variance.
□ An undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and/or detriment to nearby properties
will be produced by the granting of the variance.
2. The benefit sought by the applicant CAN/CANNOT be achieved by a method other than the requested
variance;
3. The requested variance IS/IS NOT substantial;
4. The proposed variance WILL/WILL NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or
environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district;
5. The difficulty alleged by the applicant WAS/WAS NOT self-created.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a front yard variance of 8.29 ft and a side yard variance of 1.75ft
for the legalization of 1949 and 1979 additions to the primary structure be GRANTED subject to the following
conditions, and further finds the variance granted herein is the minimum variance necessary and adequate.
Motion:
Second:
Vote: AYES ____ NAYS ____
Condition(s):
1. That, the variance is granted based on the plans and other documents submitted in support of the
application.
7/22/25
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.