Documents

environmental 188 pages

Also attached to this agenda item: QBR-Coastal assessment 7.25.2025 QBRB Chapter 230 Finding Statement QBRB Wetlands 227 Finding Statement QBR CAF 7.10.2025 QBR Village LWRP Letter

Civil, Environmental and Transportation Design Services OSPA Engineering Services, PC 800 Route 146, Bldg. 200, Suite 280 Clifton Park, NY 12065 Phone: 518.636.9956 E-Mail ospa@ospaengineering.com Web site WWW.OSPAENGINEERING.COM July 1, 2025 United States Army Corps of Engineers Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278-0090 NYSDEC Region 3 Permits 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz, NY 12561-1620 Re: Quaker Bridge Replacement, Town of Cortlandt and Village of Croton-On-Hudson, Westchester County, NY Dear Sir or Madame: OSPA Engineering Services, PC has been contracted to submit the following permit application for activity for the county funded proposed Quaker Bridge Road Bridge Replacement Project. A location map is attached. The project is located at the following coordinates: Project Coordinates NAD 27: N 41.211976 W -73.869054 The project proposes the replacement of the Quaker Bridge Road Bridge with a new structure. The Croton River is a NYSDEC Class B stream and is mapped and classified as a USFWS riverine wetland. The bridge was closed to traffic in the fall of 2024 based on the bridge condition. All prudent and feasible alternatives to avoid and minimize the impacts upon the bridge have been explored. The deterioration and condition of the bridge is too severe for rehabilitation. The project site is designated SHPO Consultation Project 17PR02639. The Quaker Bridge Road Bridge is a late nineteenth century Pratt Truss bridge built in 1894, eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The County proposes to remove the Quaker Bridge Road Bridge and replace it with a two-lane, truss bridge made of galvanized steel, built on the existing alignment with the new bridge being approximately 12 feet wider to allow for 2- way vehicular traffic as well as 2-way pedestrian passage. Two fee conveyance areas and two permanent easements will be required for the proposed project. Coordination with SHPO regarding a Memorandum of Agreement has been started and will continue upon receipt of a USACE contact. There is the potential for the federally endangered Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), the federally endangered Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis), the federally threatened Bog Turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii), the federally proposed endangered Quaker Bridge Road over Croton River Replacement OSPA Engineering Services, PC 800 Route 146, Bldg. 200, Suite 280 Clifton Park, NY 12065 Phone: 518.636.9956 E-Mail ospa@ospaengineering.com Web site WWW.OSPAENGINEERING.COM Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus), and the federally proposed threatened Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) to occur within the project area. Approximately 76 trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) equal to or greater than 2 inches are expected to be removed within the clearing window, November 1st – March 31st. The nearest hibernacula is located approximately 10.7 miles from the project site. The EAF Mapper indicates the project is within the Westchester County, County and State Park Lands Critical Environmental Area for its exceptional or unique character. The EAF Mapper indicates that there are no other known records of federally or state-listed rare or endangered animals or plants or significant natural communities, at the project site or in its immediate vicinity. The project site was evaluated for Bog turtle habitat and it was determined that habitat for the Bog Turtle is not present. A completed Joint Application Form and attachments, including project plans and additional pertinent documentation are included in this submission. If you have any questions, please contact me at 518-636-9956 or at mosterhout@ospaengineering.com. Melanie Osterhout, P.E. President Enclosures c: Creighton Manning Engineering file LETTER .............................................................................................................................................. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 3 JOINT PERMIT APPLICATION .............................................................................................................. 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Database Mapping, Wetland Delineation Report and FEAF 2. Plans 3. SHPO Documentation 7/5/25 ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT DATABASE MAPPING, WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT AND FEAF USGS Topographic Map Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County NOT TO SCALE Project Location Google Earth Site Location Map NOT TO SCALE Project Location Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County Site Aerial NOT TO SCALE Project Location Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County NYSDEC Environmental Resource Mapper NOT TO SCALE Project Location Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County USFWS NWI Mapper NOT TO SCALE Project Location Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County NYSHPO CRIS Mapper NOT TO SCALE Project Location Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County FEMA Floodplains Mapper NOT TO SCALE Project Location Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County USDA Soils Map NOT TO SCALE Project Location Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County WETLAND AND ORDINARY HIGH WATER DELINEATION REPORT Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt, Westchester County November 2024 Prepared for: By: 800 Route 146, Bldg. 200 Suite 280, Clifton Park NY 12065 (518) 636-9956 Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation 148 Martine Ave. Room 512 White Plains, NY 10601 Quaker Bridge Replacement, Town of Cortlandt November 2024 US Army Corps of Engineers/NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Wetland Delineation Report Page ii OSPA Engineering Services, P.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 1 2.1 Topography ........................................................................................................ 1 2.2 Soils ................................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Hydrology ........................................................................................................... 1 2.4 Vegetative Communities .................................................................................... 2 2.5 Wetland Mapping ............................................................................................... 2 3.0 METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS ........................................................................ 2 4.0 WETLAND AND WATERWAY IMPACTS ............................................................. 3 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: PROJECT DATABASE MAPPING APPENDIX B: PRELIMINARY ORDINARY HIGH WATER DELINEATION WITH DATA POINT APPENDIX C: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS Quaker Bridge Replacement, Town of Cortlandt November 2024 US Army Corps of Engineers/NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Wetland Delineation Report OSPA Engineering Services, P.C. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Wetland and Ordinary High Water (OHW) Delineation Report was prepared for a project site located where Quaker Bridge Road crosses the Croton River in the Town of Cortlandt, Westchester County, New York. The “Site Location Map”, in Appendix A – Project Database Mapping, illustrates the site location. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Topography Surface water generally drains to the south by channel or sheet flow. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Environmental Resource Mapper (ERM), United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey Map, and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic mapping do not identify wetlands within the project area. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map and the NYSDEC ERM both identify a river within the project site. 2.2 Soils The following is a description of the soil found on the site. The Soil Survey Mapping with the approximate project boundaries is included in Appendix A. Charlton fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes (ChD): This series is comprised of well drained, coarse loamy melt out till derived from granite, gneiss and/or schist. Charlton loam, 35 to 45 percent slopes, very stones (CIF): This series is comprised of well drained, acid loamy till derived mainly from schist, gneiss, or granite. 2.3 Hydrology Surface water generally drains to the south by channel or sheet flow which enters the Croton River (NYSDEC Class B), and eventually the Hudson River (NYSDEC Class SB). The best usage for Class B water is swimming and contact recreation, not suitable for drinking. The best usage for Class SB water is swimming, contact recreation, and fishing. Additionally, Flood Emergency Management Act (FEMA) floodplain maps (36119C0128F, 2007) were reviewed to identify any potential flood risk to the project site. The project site in the vicinity of the crossing is located within the regulatory floodway and in the 100-year floodplain of the Croton River. A review of the National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Wetland Determination Climate Data (WETS Table.36119. WESTCHESTER CO AP) for Westchester County indicates that the 20-year average annual rainfall is 58.44 inches per year. Quaker Bridge Replacement, Town of Cortlandt November 2024 US Army Corps of Engineers/NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Wetland Delineation Report OSPA Engineering Services, P.C. 2.4 Vegetative Communities Wetland plant communities follow the Cowardin system as identified in the “Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States” as utilized by the United States Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapping. The NWI mapping identifies a riverine, tidal, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded- tidal riverine community (R1UBV) within the project site. Based on the site visit, the subject property has one waterbody (Croton River). The project corridor is currently comprised of forested tree and shrub cover with an understory of herbaceous cover. The tree cover included Red Maple (Acer rubrum), American Beech (Fagus grandfolia), Eastern Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), Eastern Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and Tulip Tree (Liriodendron tulipfera). The shrub layer included Burning Bush (Euonymus alatus), Witch Hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), and Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana). The herbaceous cover included Christmas Fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), Marginal Wood Fern (Dryopteris marginalis), Shagbark Hickory (Carya ovata), Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis), and Slender Goldenrod (Solidago erecta). 2.5 Wetland Mapping The NYSDEC ERM identifies the approximate locations of the wetlands, streams, and other environmental features on or near the project site that are regulated by the NYSDEC (Appendix A). According to the NYSDEC ERM, there are no state-regulated wetlands on the project site. There is one mapped NYSDEC river (Croton River). Additionally, the NWI mapping for the project site, located in Appendix A, identifies a riverine vegetative community on the site (Croton River). 3.0 METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS The ordinary high water (OHW) determination for the area of investigation was conducted on November 18th, 2024. The delineation was performed using the three-parameter approach described in the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual and the Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement. Data was collected within the regulated areas and uplands at representative points to document the existing vegetation, soils and hydrology. Data sampling protocols followed the USACE Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast guidance for vegetation analysis. The sampling plot sizes were selected to ensure an accurate assessment of the vegetation present within the existing wetland boundaries. A 20’ x 60’ plot (1200 sf) was utilized for both tree and shrub strata, and a 5’ x 20’ plot (100 sf) was utilized for the herb stratum. These plots sizes were selected based on the narrow rectangular shape of the subject property, the site vegetation composition, and the relative vegetation density in each of the strata. Using a soil auger, soil samples were taken approximately 12 inches below the ground surface to characterize soils. Soil colors were documented using a Munsell Soil Color Chart. Hydrology was assessed by evaluating for inundation, saturation, and other site conditions. Quaker Bridge Replacement, Town of Cortlandt November 2024 US Army Corps of Engineers/NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Wetland Delineation Report OSPA Engineering Services, P.C. Vegetation found at the sampling locations was identified in terms of the dominant species in the tree, shrub/sapling, herbaceous, and vine layers. The indicator status of the dominant plant species was determined using the “The National Wetland Plant List - Northcentral and Northeast Region 1” (Lichvar, R.W., 2016). Following the establishment of the OHW boundaries in the field, the boundary was collected by hand-held GPS and plotted on the field sketch. This OHW line and approximate property boundary is included within Appendix B (“Preliminary Ordinary High Water and Delineation with Data Point”) and includes the location of a representative data point. The information collected at the data point locations is included in this report as Appendix C – Wetland Determination Data Forms. The field efforts identified one (1) perennial river (Croton River), the OHW was delineated as a flag series of LB (1-16) and RB (1-27). No wetlands were identified during the site visit. The upland areas are generally dominated by maintained right of way, residential homes and maintained lawns, forested shrub and tree cover. 4.0 WETLAND AND WATERWAY IMPACTS It was concluded that Stream LB (1-16) and RB (1-27) will be regulated by the USACE and the NYSDEC as a Class B waterbody. While the site is currently in preliminary design, impacts to regulated waterbodies will be minimized as part of the proposed bridge replacement. It is anticipated that a USACE Section 404 Nationwide Permit 3 will be required based on the anticipated impacts (less than 0.5 acres). In addition, a NYSDEC Article 15 Protection of Waters Permit and a NYSDEC Section 401 Water Quality Certification would be required. Ultimately, the exact permitting pathway can only be confirmed through coordination with the USACE and the NYSDEC. Quaker Bridge Replacement, Town of Cortlandt November 2024 US Army Corps of Engineers/NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Wetland Delineation Report OSPA Engineering Services, P.C. References U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Wetlands Delineation Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region (Version 2.0) National Wetland Inventory Map, USFWS. USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service. Soil Survey for Westchester County, New York. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. National Cooperative Soil Survey. Official Soil Descriptions from the National Soils Database. U.S. Geological Survey. Bridgeport, NY Quadrangle. 2023. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number 36119C0128F, 2007. Lichvar, R.W. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List - Northcentral and Northeast Region 1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Project Database Mapping DATABASE MAPPING PROVIDED PREVIOUSLY Appendix B Preliminary Wetland and Ordinary High Water Delineation with Data Point Preliminary Wetland and Ordinary High Water Delineation with Data Points NOT TO SCALE Quaker Bridge Replacement Town of Cortlandt Westchester County Appendix C Wetland Determination Data Forms Project/Site: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) No Yes Depth (inches): X X X Depth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water (A1) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) X Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No No Yes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X Westchester County No 41.211978° Charlton laom, 35 to 45 percent slopes, very stony 11/18/2024 DP-RBU Quaker Bridge Replacement Westchester County City/County: NY 73.869444° Yes No X No X Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) No No X X No Yes No NAD 83 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Data point was sampled on streambank, upland. Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? Surface Water Present? Section, Township, Range: Concave Local relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) N. Laing, G. Koetzle LRR R, MLRA 144A (If no, explain in Remarks.) Streambank Marl Deposits (B15) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: x 1 = 1. x 2 = 2. x 3 = 3. x 4 = 4. x 5 = 5. Column Totals: (B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species DP-RBU Liriodendron tulipifera Platanus occidentalis Betula populifolia Quercus coccinea FACU 30'x30' Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: ) Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: No Acer rubrum data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Acer rubrum Euonymus alatus Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Multiply by: 50.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: No FAC FACU Yes No FAC Yes No No FACU FACU FACU FAC Yes Ostrya virginiana No No Yes No Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. =Total Cover ) 5'x5' =Total Cover =Total Cover ) Carya cordiformis Solidago erecta Botrychium multifidum FACU FACU FACU Equisetum arvense Fraxinus americana Polystichum acrostichoides FACU Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Yes Yes FACW FACU No UPL Dominant Species? Euonymus alatus 15'x15' Tsuga canadensis 3.64 No Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover FACU 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) Type: Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) Black Histic (A3) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Matrix Histic Epipedon (A2) MLRA 149B) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox Features Depth (inches) Color (moist) 2.5YR 3/1 0-8 DP-RBU SOIL Type1 % This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to reflect the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Rock No Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Depth (inches): Yes Hydric Soil Present? Color (moist) Marl (F10) (LRR K, L) Other (Explain in Remarks) Loc2 Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Project/Site: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. If yes, optional Wetland Site ID: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Wetland Hydrology Present? Crayfish Burrows (C8) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) No Yes Depth (inches): X X X Depth (inches): X Depth (inches): Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Saturation Present? Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Sediment Deposits (B2) Drift Deposits (B3) Surface Water (A1) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) X Shallow Aquitard (D3) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Remarks: (includes capillary fringe) Yes No No Yes Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Field Observations: Water Table Present? High Water Table (A2) WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Northcentral and Northeast Region X X Westchester County No 41.212078° Charlton laom, 35 to 45 percent slopes, very stony 11/18/2024 DP-LBU Quaker Bridge Replacement Westchester County City/County: NY 73.868333° Yes No X No X Yes Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Yes HYDROLOGY Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) No No X X No Yes No NAD 83 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Wetland Hydrology Present? Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Data point was sampled on streambank, upland. Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Yes Yes Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Slope (%): Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? naturally problematic? Surface Water Present? Section, Township, Range: Concave Local relief (concave, convex, none): Yes Algal Mat or Crust (B4) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Thin Muck Surface (C7) N. Laing, G. Koetzle LRR R, MLRA 144A (If no, explain in Remarks.) Streambank Marl Deposits (B15) US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (A/B) 7. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: x 1 = 1. x 2 = 2. x 3 = 3. x 4 = 4. x 5 = 5. Column Totals: (B) 6. 7. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. – Use scientific names of plants. OBL species FACW species FAC species FACU species UPL species DP-LBU Fragus grandifolia Tsuga canadensis Acer rubrum FAC 30'x30' Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: ) Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: No data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Euonymus alatus Fagus grandifolia Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Multiply by: 0.0% Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total % Cover of: Prevalence Index worksheet: FACU Yes No FACU Yes No No No FACU FACU FACU UPL Yes Quercus rubra No Yes Yes Tree – Woody plants 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Definitions of Vegetation Strata: Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Woody vines – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Yes No Sapling/shrub – Woody plants less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. =Total Cover ) 5'x5' =Total Cover =Total Cover ) Carya ovata Carya cordiformis FACU FACU Fagus grandifolia Acer rubrum Hamamelis virginiana Dryopteris marginalis FACU Indicator Status Absolute % Cover Yes Yes FACU FACU Dominant Species? Polystichum acrostichoides 15'x15' Fraxinus americana 4.05 No Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) VEGETATION (A) (B) (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = Tree Stratum Woody Vine Stratum Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01 ) =Total Cover FAC FACU 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Sampling Point: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR K, L) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR K, L) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR K, L) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) High Chroma Sands (S11) (LRR K, L) Type: Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR R, MLRA 149B) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) Mesic Spodic (TA6) (MLRA 144A, 145, 149B) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149B) Red Parent Material (F21) Depleted Matrix (F3) Black Histic (A3) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR R, % Matrix Histic Epipedon (A2) MLRA 149B) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Histosol (A1) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR K, L, MLRA 149B) Redox Features Depth (inches) Color (moist) 7.5YR 3/1 0-3 DP-LBU SOIL Type1 % This data form is revised from Northcentral and Northeast Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to reflect the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils version 7.0 March 2013 Errata. (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_051293.docx) Remarks: Stripped Matrix (S6) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Rock No Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) X Depth (inches): Yes Hydric Soil Present? Color (moist) Marl (F10) (LRR K, L) Other (Explain in Remarks) Loc2 Texture Remarks Loamy/Clayey Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. US Army Corps of Engineers Northcentral and Northeast Region – Version 2.0 Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 - Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor; and, when possible, generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A & B. In Sections C, D & E, most items contain an initial question that must be answered either “Yes” or “No”. If the answer to the initial question is “Yes”, complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is “No”, proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the applicant or project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1is accurate and complete. Project Location (describe, and attach a general location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action (include purpose or need): E-Mail: State: Project Contact (if not same as sponsor; give name and title/role): E-Mail: State: E-Mail: State: Quaker Bridge Road Bridge Replacement (RB03W) Quaker Bridge Road over Croton River, Town of Cortlandt and Village of Croton-On-Hudson, Westchester County, NY Replacement of the steel truss bridge which carries Quaker Bridge Road over the Croton River. Constructed in 1894, it is a 98-foot long, single-lane bridge with stone abutments that is now closed due to structural deficiencies. The new bridge will be also be a truss bridge made of galvanized steel and built on the existing alignment, but will be approximately 12 feet wider to allow for 2-way vehicular traffic as well as 2-way pedestrian passage. Scope of work will include new concrete abutments and the removal of trees to accommodate construction staging areas and overhead construction activities, such as those utilizing cranes for pile and bridge installation, wingwall installation and site grading. Project limits will be Quaker bridge and approximately 200 feet along the south approach and 500 feet along the north approach to the bridge to accommodate the bridge replacement and reconstructing the roadway impacted by the construction activities, including excavation for the bridge abutment removal and reconstruction. An overhead electrical line may need to be relocated to accommodate overhead construction activities. 914-995-2000 148 Martine Avenue White Plains NY Hugh J. Greechan, Jr., P.E., Commissioner of Westchester County PW&T 914-995-2546 hjg7@westchestercountyny.gov Department of Public Works and Transportation, 148 Martine Avenue, Room 512 White Plains NY Bridge owned by County; riverbanks & roads owned by Town of Cortlandt, Village of Croton & NYS B. Government Approvals B. Government Approvals, Funding, or Sponsorship. (“Funding” includes grants, loans, tax relief, and any other forms of financial assistance.) i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area, or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? Will administrative or legislative adoption, or amendment of a plan, local law, ordinance, rule or regulation be the 9 Yes 9 No only approval(s) which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes, complete sections C, F and G. • If No, proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2. Adopted land use plans. a. Do any municipally- adopted (city, town, village or county) comprehensive land use plan(s) include the site 9 Yes 9 No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes, does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action 9 Yes 9 No would be located? b. Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district (for example: Greenway; Brownfield Opportunity Area (BOA); designated State or Federal heritage area; watershed management plan; c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, 9 Yes 9 No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? (Village of Croton)  Village of Croton-on-Hudson (property transfer & easement); Town of Cortlandt (various) Coordination ongoing    Water Control Commission (Wetland permit) Waterfront Advisory Committee (LWRP review) TBD  Westchester County Board of Legislators (project authorization and funding) June 2025 (projected)   NYSDEC Section 401/Article 15 NYSHPO (consultation) TBD  USACE NWP#3, USFWS (consultation) TBD       Both Town of Cortlandt and Village of Croton-on-Hudson are Greenway Compact Communities. Site is within the County's Critical Environmental Areas under County and State Park Lands and Croton Point Park. Part of the project area is also within the Village of Croton-on-Hudson's LWRP.  C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. If Yes, what is the zoning classification(s) including any applicable overlay district? b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? c. Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? If Yes, i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? ___________________________________________________________________ C.4. Existing community services. a. In what school district is the project site located? ________________________________________________________________ b. What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? c. Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? a. What is the general nature of the proposed action (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial, recreational; if mixed, include all components)? b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? i. If Yes, what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units (e.g., acres, miles, housing units, square feet)? % ____________________ Units: ____________________ d. Is the proposed action a subdivision, or does it include a subdivision? If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision? (e.g., residential, industrial, commercial; if mixed, specify types) iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum __________ Maximum __________ 9 Yes 9 No _____ months _____ _____ month _____ year e. Will the proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) • Anticipated completion date of final phase _____ month _____year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases, including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: _______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  Croton: PRE-1 Park Recreation and Education and RA-25 One Family Residence; Cortlandt: R-80 Single Family Residential   Croton-Harmon Union Free School District Croton-on-Hudson Police Department, NYS Police and Westchester County Public Safety The Croton Fire District and Westchester Emergency Medical Services N/A 1.2 0.50 0.60  1,200 SF increase in deck   Infrastructural (transportation) f. Does the project include new residential uses? g. Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction (including expansions)? If Yes, i. Total number of structures ___________ ii. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ________height; ________width; and _______ length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: ______________________ square feet h. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any 9 Yes 9 No liquids, such as creation of a water supply, reservoir, pond, lake, waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: ________________________________________________________________________________ ii. If a water impoundment, the principal source of the water: 9 Ground water 9 Surface water streams 9 Other specify: iii. If other than water, identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. Volume: ____________ million gallons; surface area: ____________ acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: ________ height; _______ length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure (e.g., earth fill, rock, wood, concrete): a. Does the proposed action include any excavation, mining, or dredging, during construction, operations, or both? (Not including general site preparation, grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i .What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? _______________________________________________________________ ii. How much material (including rock, earth, sediments, etc.) is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume (specify tons or cubic yards): ____________________________________________ • Over what duration of time? ____________________________________________________ iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged, and plans to use, manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? _____________________________________acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? _______________________________ acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? __________________________ feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: _____________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ b. Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of, increase or decrease in size of, or encroachment 9 Yes 9 No into any existing wetland, waterbody, shoreline, beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected (by name, water index number, wetland map number or geographic description): ______________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________   N/A   Suitable materials to be reused for wider roadway or will be disposed of in off-site location approved by engineer in charge.  Dewatering may be required for full depth removal of abutments. 0.1 0.1  Site will be restored to existing conditions.  Croton River ii. iii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland, e.g. excavation, fill, placement of structures, or alteration of channels, banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities, alterations and additions in square feet or acres: Will the proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? iv. Will the proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: ___________________________________________________________ • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:________________________________________ • purpose of proposed removal (e.g. beach clearing, invasive species control, boat access): ____________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • proposed method of plant removal: ________________________________________________________________________ • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s): _________________________________________________ v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ c. Will the proposed action use, or create a new demand for water? If Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: __________________________ gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? If Yes: • Name of district or service area: _________________________________________________________________________ • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? • Is the project site in the existing district? • Is expansion of the district needed? • Do existing lines serve the project site? iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Source(s) of supply for the district: ________________________________________________________________________ iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ________________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: __________________________________________________________________ • Proposed source(s) of supply for new district: _______________________________________________________________ v. If a public water supply will not be used, describe plans to provide water supply for the project: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ vi. If water supply will be from wells (public or private), what is the maximum pumping capacity: _______ gallons/minute. d. Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: _______________ gallons/day ii. Nature of liquid wastes to be generated (e.g., sanitary wastewater, industrial; if combination, describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): __________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: _____________________________________________________________ • Name of district: ______________________________________________________________________________________ • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? • Is the project site in the existing district? • Is expansion of the district needed? Croton River, less than 0.1 acres of permanent impacts. New wing walls will be constructed on both banks, with site grading and placement of riprap on banks.     9 Yes 9 No • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? • Will a line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: ____________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iv. Will a new wastewater (sewage) treatment district be formed to serve the project site? If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: ____________________________________________________________________ • Date application submitted or anticipated: _______________________________________________________________ • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? __________________________________________________ v. If public facilities will not be used, describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed receiving water (name and classification if surface discharge or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture, recycle or reuse liquid waste: _______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ e. Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff, either from new point 9 Yes 9 No sources (i.e. ditches, pipes, swales, curbs, gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater) or non-point source (i.e. sheet flow) during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? _____ Square feet or _____ acres (impervious surface) _____ Square feet or _____ acres (parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed (i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures, adjacent properties, groundwater, on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? • If to surface waters, identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: ________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? iv. Does the proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces, use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? f. Does the proposed action include, or will it use on-site, one or more sources of air emissions, including fuel 9 Yes 9 No combustion, waste incineration, or other processes or operations? i. Mobile sources during project operations (e.g., heavy equipment, fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction (e.g., power generation, structural heating, batch plant, crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations (e.g., process emissions, large boilers, electric generation) g. Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f (above), require a NY State Air Registration, Air Facility Permit, 9 Yes 9 No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet 9 Yes 9 No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application, the project will generate: • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons (HFCs) • ___________Tons/year (short tons) of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)    h. Will the proposed action generate or emit methane (including, but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, 9 Yes 9 No landfills, composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year (metric): ________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe any methane capture, control or elimination measures included in project design (e.g., combustion to generate heat or electricity, flaring): ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as 9 Yes 9 No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions (e.g., diesel exhaust, rock particulates/dust): j. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial 9 Yes 9 No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected (Check all that apply): † Randomly between hours of __________ to ________. ii. For commercial activities only, projected number of truck trips/day and type (e.g., semi trailers and dump trucks): _____________ iii. iv. v. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? Yes No 9 Yes 9 No vi. Are public/private transportation service(s) or facilities available within ½ mile of the proposed site? vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid, electric 9 Yes 9 No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii. Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing 9 Yes 9 No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k. Will the proposed action (for commercial or industrial projects only) generate new or additional demand 9 Yes 9 No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ____________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project (e.g., on-site combustion, on-site renewable, via grid/local utility, or other): iii. Will the proposed action require a new, or an upgrade, to an existing substation? l. Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. • Monday - Friday: _________________________ • Monday - Friday: ____________________________ • Saturday: ________________________________ • Saturday: ___________________________________ • Sunday: _________________________________ • Sunday: ____________________________________ • Holidays: ________________________________ • Holidays: ___________________________________ If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads, creation of new roads or change in existing access, describe:     7am-5pm N/A N/A N/A N/A m. Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, 9 Yes 9 No operation, or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration: ii. Will the proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? n. W th ill prop e os actio ed hav n e outd ligh oor ting? If yes: i. Describe source(s), location(s), height of fixture(s), direction/aim, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? If Yes, describe possible sources, potential frequency and duration of odor emissions, and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ______________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ p. Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum (combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: ii. Volume(s) ______ per unit time ___________ (e.g., month, year) q. Will the proposed action (commercial, industrial and recreational projects only) use pesticides (i.e., herbicides, 9 Yes 9 No insecticides) during construction or operation? If Yes: ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? r. Will the proposed action (commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal 9 Yes 9 No of solid waste (excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s) to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) • Operation : ____________________ tons per ________________ (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: ________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ • Operation: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  During construction only for the hours previously listed.       s. Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site (e.g., recycling or transfer station, composting, landfill, or other disposal activities): ___________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • ________ Tons/month, if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment, or • ________ Tons/hour, if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill, anticipated site life: ________________________________ years t. Will the proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation, treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous 9 Yes 9 No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s) of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated, handled or managed at facility: ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated _____ tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization, recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: ____________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? If Yes: provide name and location of facility: _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.1. Land uses on and surrounding the project site a. Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on, adjoining and near the project site. b. Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Current Acreage Acreage After Project Completion Change (Acres +/-) • Roads, buildings, and other paved or impervious surfaces • Forested • Meadows, grasslands or brushlands (non- agricultural, including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural (includes active orchards, field, greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, etc.) • Wetlands (freshwater or tidal) • Non-vegetated (bare rock, earth or fill) • Other Describe: _______________________________ ________________________________________      Shoreline 0.20 0.21 +0.01 0.50 0.19 -0.31 0.30 +0.30 0.40 0.39 -0.01 0.10 0.11 +0.01 c. Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? d. Are there any facilities serving children, the elderly, people with disabilities (e.g., schools, hospitals, licensed 9 Yes 9 No day care centers, or group homes) within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: e. Does the project site contain an existing dam? If Yes: • Dam height: • Dam length: • Surface area: • Volume impounded: _______________________________ gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam=s existing hazard classification: _________________________________________________________________________ iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f. Has the project site ever been used as a municipal, commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, 9 Yes 9 No or does the project site adjoin property which is now, or was at one time, used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: • If yes, cite sources/documentation: _______________________________________________________________________ ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: __________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ g. Have hazardous wastes been generated, treated and/or disposed of at the site, or does the project site adjoin 9 Yes 9 No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s) handled and waste management activities, including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site, or have any 9 Yes 9 No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: i. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site 9 Yes 9 No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities, describe control measures:_______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? iv. If yes to (i), (ii) or (iii) above, describe current status of site(s):  Pedestrian use for Croton Gorge Trail Access        v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? • If yes, DEC site ID number: ____________________________________________________________________________ • Describe the type of institutional control (e.g., deed restriction or easement): ____________________________________ • Describe any use limitations: ___________________________________________________________________________ • Describe any engineering controls: _______________________________________________________________________ • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? • Explain: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a. What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? If Yes, what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? __________________% c. Predominant soil type(s) present on project site: d. What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: _________ feet e. Drainage status of project site soils: 9 Well Drained: f. Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 9 0-10%: g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies (including streams, rivers, 9 Yes 9 No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? If Yes to either i or ii, continue. If No, skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, 9 Yes 9 No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site, provide the following information: • Streams: • Lakes or Ponds: Name ____________________________________________ Classification _______________________ • Wetlands: • Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) _____________________________ v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 9 Yes 9 No waterbodies? If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: _____________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ i. Is the project site in a designated Floo dway? j. Is the project site in the 100-year Floodplain? k. Is the project site in the 500-year Floodplain? l. Is the project site located over, or immediately adjoining, a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? If Yes:  >7  Charlton loam (ClF) 98.3 Paxton fine Sandy loam (PnB) 1.7 >6   1.7  98.3     B 864-68 Federal Waters, Federal Waters, Federal Waters,...      Principal Aquifer, Primary Aquifer m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: n. Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community (composition, function, and basis for designation): _____________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of description or evaluation: ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: • Following completion of project as proposed: _____________________ acres • Gain or loss (indicate + or -): o. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 9 Yes 9 No endangered or threatened, or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare, or as a species of 9 Yes 9 No special concern? q. Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting, trapping, fishing or shell fishing? If yes, give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: ___________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to 9 Yes 9 No Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: _________________________________________________________________ b. Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? i. If Yes: acreage(s) on project site? ___________________________________________________________________________ ii. Source(s) of soil rating(s): _________________________________________________________________________________ c. Does the project site contain all or part of, or is it substantially contiguous to, a registered National 9 Yes 9 No Natural Landmark? If Yes: ii. Provide brief description of landmark, including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: ___________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ d. Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? If Yes: If Yes: i. If Yes: Consultant observed: Grey Squirrel Nearby eBird sitings: Canada Goose Prior observations: Bass, Minnows, Bald Eagle, Mallard, White-tailed Deer Tufted Titmouse, Common Merganser Chubs, Shiners, American Eel, Herons, Common Grackle, Dark-eyed Junco Green Frogs,Chipmunks, Raccons     Croton River is used for fishing and is accessible at multiple locations beyond the project area, which will not be impacted.    County & State Park Lands Exceptional or unique character Agency:Westchester County, Date:1-31-90  e. Does the project site contain, or is it substantially contiguous to, a building, archaeological site, or district 9 Yes 9 No which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i. Nature of historic/archaeological resource: 9 Archaeological Site 9 Historic Building or District ii. Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for 9 Yes 9 No archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory? g. Have additional archaeological or historic site(s) or resources been identified on the project site? If Yes: i. Describe possible resource(s): _______________________________________________________________________________ ii. Basis for identification: ___________________________________________________________________________________ h. Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: _________________________________________________________________________________________ ii. Nature of, or basis for, designation (e.g., established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ iii. Distance between project and resource: _____________________ miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers 9 Yes 9 No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ________________________________________________________________ ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? F. Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal, please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ___________________________________ Date_______________________________________ Signature________________________________________________ Title_______________________________________   Eligible property:Quaker Bridge. BIN 3348560, Old Croton Aqueduct Bridge is architecturally significant, recognizing it as a rare and outstanding example of a late nineteenth-century Pratt Truss bridge.    Black Rock Park, Silver Lake Park, Croton Gorge Trail, Croton Gorge Park, Old Croton Aqueduct State Historic Park Local, County and State parks and trails 0 - 0.1  County of Westchester April 15, 2025 (Revised: June 26, 2025) Assistant Commissioner EAF Mapper Summary Report Thursday, November 21, 2024 11:39 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form (EAF). Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. Yes B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] Yes C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Listed] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Site] No E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Name] 864-68 E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Stream Classification] B E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features - Wetlands Name] Federal Waters E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] Yes E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Yes E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Yes Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report E.2.l. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.l. [Aquifer Names] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] Yes E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area - Name] County & State Park Lands E.3.d.ii [Critical Environmental Area - Reason] Yes - Digital mapping data for archaeological site boundaries are not available. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.e.ii [National or State Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites - Name] Eligible property:Quaker Bridge. BIN 3348560, Old Croton Aqueduct E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] Yes E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 - Identification of Potential Project Impacts Part 2 is to be completed by the lead agency. Part 2 is designed to help the lead agency inventory all potential resources that could be affected by a proposed project or action. We recognize that the lead agency=s reviewer(s) will not necessarily be environmental professionals. So, the questions are designed to walk a reviewer through the assessment process by providing a series of questions that can be answered using the information found in Part 1. To further assist the lead agency in completing Part 2, the form identifies the most relevant questions in Part 1 that will provide the information needed to answer the Part 2 question. When Part 2 is completed, the lead agency will have identified the relevant environmental areas that may be impacted by the proposed activity. If the lead agency is a state agency and the action is in any Coastal Area, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Tips for completing Part 2: • Review all of the information provided in Part 1. • Review any application, maps, supporting materials and the Full EAF Workbook. • Answer each of the 18 questions in Part 2. • If you answer “Yes” to a numbered question, please complete all the questions that follow in that section. • If you answer “No” to a numbered question, move on to the next numbered question. • Check appropriate column to indicate the anticipated size of the impact. • Proposed projects that would exceed a numeric threshold contained in a question should result in the reviewing agency checking the box “Moderate to large impact may occur.” • The reviewer is not expected to be an expert in environmental analysis. • If you are not sure or undecided about the size of an impact, it may help to review the sub-questions for the general question and consult the workbook. • When answering a question consider all components of the proposed activity, that is, the Awhole action@. • Consider the possibility for long-term and cumulative impacts as well as direct impacts. • Answer the question in a reasonable manner considering the scale and context of the project. 1. Impact on Land Proposed action may involve construction on, or physical alteration of, † NO † YES the land surface of the proposed site. (See Part 1. D.1) If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 2. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may involve construction on land where depth to water table is less than 3 feet. E2d b. The proposed action may involve construction on slopes of 15% or greater. E2f c. The proposed action may involve construction on land where bedrock is exposed, or generally within 5 feet of existing ground surface. E2a d. The proposed action may involve the excavation and removal of more than 1,000 tons of natural material. D2a e. The proposed action may involve construction that continues for more than one year or in multiple phases. D1e f. The proposed action may result in increased erosion, whether from physical disturbance or vegetation removal (including from treatment by herbicides). D2e, D2q g. The proposed action is, or may be, located within a Coastal Erosion hazard area. B1i h. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Agency Use Only [If applicable] Project : Date : FEAF 2019 RB03W June 2025         2. Impact on Geological Features The proposed action may result in the modification or destruction of, or inhibit access to, any unique or unusual land forms on the site (e.g., cliffs, dunes, † NO † YES minerals, fossils, caves). (See Part 1. E.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, move on to Section 3. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Identify the specific land form(s) attached: ________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ E2g b. The proposed action may affect or is adjacent to a geological feature listed as a registered National Natural Landmark. Specific feature: _____________________________________________________ E3c c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 3. Impacts on Surface Water The proposed action may affect one or more wetlands or other surface water † NO † YES bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, ponds or lakes). (See Part 1. D.2, E.2.h) If “Yes”, answer questions a - l. If “No”, move on to Section 4. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may create a new water body. D2b, D1h b. The proposed action may result in an increase or decrease of over 10% or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water. D2b c. The proposed action may involve dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from a wetland or water body. D2a d. The proposed action may involve construction within or adjoining a freshwater or tidal wetland, or in the bed or banks of any other water body. E2h e. The proposed action may create turbidity in a waterbody, either from upland erosion, runoff or by disturbing bottom sediments. D2a, D2h f. The proposed action may include construction of one or more intake(s) for withdrawal of water from surface water. D2c g. The proposed action may include construction of one or more outfall(s) for discharge of wastewater to surface water(s). D2d h. The proposed action may cause soil erosion, or otherwise create a source of stormwater discharge that may lead to siltation or other degradation of receiving water bodies. D2e i. The proposed action may affect the water quality of any water bodies within or downstream of the site of the proposed action. E2h j. The proposed action may involve the application of pesticides or herbicides in or around any water body. D2q, E2h k. The proposed action may require the construction of new, or expansion of existing, wastewater treatment facilities. D1a, D2d              l. Other impacts: _______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 4. Impact on groundwater The proposed action may result in new or additional use of ground water, or † NO † YES may have the potential to introduce contaminants to ground water or an aquifer. (See Part 1. D.2.a, D.2.c, D.2.d, D.2.p, D.2.q, D.2.t) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 5. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may require new water supply wells, or create additional demand on supplies from existing water supply wells. D2c b. Water supply demand from the proposed action may exceed safe and sustainable withdrawal capacity rate of the local supply or aquifer. Cite Source: ________________________________________________________ D2c c. The proposed action may allow or result in residential uses in areas without water and sewer services. D1a, D2c d. The proposed action may include or require wastewater discharged to groundwater. D2d, E2l e. The proposed action may result in the construction of water supply wells in locations where groundwater is, or is suspected to be, contaminated. D2c, E1f, E1g, E1h f. The proposed action may require the bulk storage of petroleum or chemical products over ground water or an aquifer. D2p, E2l g. The proposed action may involve the commercial application of pesticides within 100 feet of potable drinking water or irrigation sources. E2h, D2q, E2l, D2c h. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 5. Impact on Flooding The proposed action may result in development on lands subject to flooding. † NO † YES (See Part 1. E.2) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, move on to Section 6. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in development in a designated floodway. E2i b. The proposed action may result in development within a 100 year floodplain. E2j c. The proposed action may result in development within a 500 year floodplain. E2k d. The proposed action may result in, or require, modification of existing drainage patterns. D2b, D2e e. The proposed action may change flood water flows that contribute to flooding. D2b, E2i, E2j, E2k f. If there is a dam located on the site of the proposed action, is the dam in need of repair, or upgrade? E1e         g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ 6. Impacts on Air † NO † YES The proposed action may include a state regulated air emission source. (See Part 1. D.2.f., D.2.h, D.2.g) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, move on to Section 7. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. If the proposed action requires federal or state air emission permits, the action may also emit one or more greenhouse gases at or above the following levels: i. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide (CO2) ii. More than 3.5 tons/year of nitrous oxide (N2O) iii. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon equivalent of perfluorocarbons (PFCs) iv. More than .045 tons/year of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) v. More than 1000 tons/year of carbon dioxide equivalent of hydrochloroflourocarbons (HFCs) emissions vi. 43 tons/year or more of methane D2g D2g D2g D2g D2g D2h b. The proposed action may generate 10 tons/year or more of any one designated hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons/year or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants. D2g c. The proposed action may require a state air registration, or may produce an emissions rate of total contaminants that may exceed 5 lbs. per hour, or may include a heat source capable of producing more than 10 million BTU=s per hour. D2f, D2g d. The proposed action may reach 50% of any of the thresholds in “a” through “c”, above. D2g e. The proposed action may result in the combustion or thermal treatment of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. D2s f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 7. Impact on Plants and Animals The proposed action may result in a loss of flora or fauna. (See Part 1. E.2. m.-q.) † NO † YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - j. If “No”, move on to Section 8. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may cause reduction in population or loss of individuals of any threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2o b. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any rare, threatened or endangered species, as listed by New York State or the federal government. E2o c. The proposed action may cause reduction in population, or loss of individuals, of any species of special concern or conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government, that use the site, or are found on, over, or near the site. E2p d. The proposed action may result in a reduction or degradation of any habitat used by any species of special concern and conservation need, as listed by New York State or the Federal government. E2p       e. The proposed action may diminish the capacity of a registered National Natural Landmark to support the biological community it was established to protect. E3c f. The proposed action may result in the removal of, or ground disturbance in, any portion of a designated significant natural community. Source: ____________________________________________________________ E2n g. The proposed action may substantially interfere with nesting/breeding, foraging, or over-wintering habitat for the predominant species that occupy or use the project site. E2m h. The proposed action requires the conversion of more than 10 acres of forest, grassland or any other regionally or locally important habitat. Habitat type & information source: ______________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ E1b i. Proposed action (commercial, industrial or recreational projects, only) involves use of herbicides or pesticides. D2q j. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 8. Impact on Agricultural Resources The proposed action may impact agricultural resources. (See Part 1. E.3.a. and b.) † NO † YES If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, move on to Section 9. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may impact soil classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System. E2c, E3b b. The proposed action may sever, cross or otherwise limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc). E1a, Elb c. The proposed action may result in the excavation or compaction of the soil profile of active agricultural land. E3b d. The proposed action may irreversibly convert agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, either more than 2.5 acres if located in an Agricultural District, or more than 10 acres if not within an Agricultural District. E1b, E3a e. The proposed action may disrupt or prevent installation of an agricultural land management system. El a, E1b f. The proposed action may result, directly or indirectly, in increased development potential or pressure on farmland. C2c, C3, D2c, D2d g. The proposed project is not consistent with the adopted municipal Farmland Protection Plan. C2c h. Other impacts: ________________________________________________________       The project will require the removal of approximately 76 trees with DBH of 2 inches or greater; of which 45 are between 6-inch to 32-inch DBH.  9. Impact on Aesthetic Resources The land use of the proposed action are obviously different from, or are in † NO † YES sharp contrast to, current land use patterns between the proposed project and a scenic or aesthetic resource. (Part 1. E.1.a, E.1.b, E.3.h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, go to Section 10. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Proposed action may be visible from any officially designated federal, state, or local scenic or aesthetic resource. E3h b. The proposed action may result in the obstruction, elimination or significant screening of one or more officially designated scenic views. E3h, C2b c. The proposed action may be visible from publicly accessible vantage points: i. Seasonally (e.g., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ii. Year round E3h d. The situation or activity in which viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is: i. Routine travel by residents, including travel to and from work ii. Recreational or tourism based activities E3h E2q, E1c e. The proposed action may cause a diminishment of the public enjoyment and appreciation of the designated aesthetic resource. E3h f. There are similar projects visible within the following distance of the proposed project: 0-1/2 mile ½ -3 mile 3-5 mile 5+ mile D1a, E1a, D1f, D1g g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 10. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources The proposed action may occur in or adjacent to a historic or archaeological † NO † YES resource. (Part 1. E.3.e, f. and g.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 11. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur E3e b. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) archaeological site inventory. E3f c. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, an archaeological site not included on the NY SHPO inventory. Source: ____________________________________________________________ E3g a. The proposed action may occur wholly or partially within, or substantially contiguous to, any buildings, archaeological site or district which is listed on the National or State Register of Historical Places, or that has been determined by the Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places.      d. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ e. If any of the above (a-d) are answered “Moderate to large impact may occur”, continue with the following questions to help support conclusions in Part 3: i. The proposed action may result in the destruction or alteration of all or part of the site or property. ii. The proposed action may result in the alteration of the property’s setting or integrity. iii. The proposed action may result in the introduction of visual elements which are out of character with the site or property, or may alter its setting. E3e, E3g, E3f E3e, E3f, E3g, E1a, E1b E3e, E3f, E3g, E3h, C2, C3 11. Impact on Open Space and Recreation The proposed action may result in a loss of recreational opportunities or a † NO † YES reduction of an open space resource as designated in any adopted municipal open space plan. (See Part 1. C.2.c, E.1.c., E.2.q.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 12. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in an impairment of natural functions, or “ecosystem services”, provided by an undeveloped area, including but not limited to stormwater storage, nutrient cycling, wildlife habitat. D2e, E1b E2h, E2m, E2o, E2n, E2p b. The proposed action may result in the loss of a current or future recreational resource. C2a, E1c, C2c, E2q c. The proposed action may eliminate open space or recreational resource in an area with few such resources. C2a, C2c E1c, E2q d. The proposed action may result in loss of an area now used informally by the community as an open space resource. C2c, E1c e. Other impacts: _____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 12. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas The proposed action may be located within or adjacent to a critical † NO † YES environmental area (CEA). (See Part 1. E.3.d) If “Yes”, answer questions a - c. If “No”, go to Section 13. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d b. The proposed action may result in a reduction in the quality of the resource or characteristic which was the basis for designation of the CEA. E3d c. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________  The project will remove a structure that is eligible for listing.        13. Impact on Transportation The proposed action may result in a change to existing transportation systems. † NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.j) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 14. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. Projected traffic increase may exceed capacity of existing road network. D2j b. The proposed action may result in the construction of paved parking area for 500 or more vehicles. D2j c. The proposed action will degrade existing transit access. D2j d. The proposed action will degrade existing pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. D2j e.The proposed action may alter the present pattern of movement of people or goods. D2j f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 14. Impact on Energy The proposed action may cause an increase in the use of any form of energy. † NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.k) If “Yes”, answer questions a - e. If “No”, go to Section 15. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action will require a new, or an upgrade to an existing, substation. D2k b. The proposed action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two-family residences or to serve a commercial or industrial use. D1f, D1q, D2k c. The proposed action may utilize more than 2,500 MWhrs per year of electricity. D2k d. The proposed action may involve heating and/or cooling of more than 100,000 square feet of building area when completed. D1g e. Other Impacts: ________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ 15. Impact on Noise, Odor, and Light The proposed action may result in an increase in noise, odors, or outdoor lighting. † NO † YES (See Part 1. D.2.m., n., and o.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - f. If “No”, go to Section 16. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may produce sound above noise levels established by local regulation. D2m b. The proposed action may result in blasting within 1,500 feet of any residence, hospital, school, licensed day care center, or nursing home. D2m, E1d c. The proposed action may result in routine odors for more than one hour per day. D2o        Temporary detour required during construction. Project will restore a pre-existing vehicular travel route with added pedestrian accommodations.   d. The proposed action may result in light shining onto adjoining properties. D2n e. The proposed action may result in lighting creating sky-glow brighter than existing area conditions. D2n, E1a f. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 16. Impact on Human Health The proposed action may have an impact on human health from exposure † NO † YES to new or existing sources of contaminants. (See Part 1.D.2.q., E.1. d. f. g. and h.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - m. If “No”, go to Section 17. Relevant Part I Question(s) No,or small impact may cccur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action is located within 1500 feet of a school, hospital, licensed day care center, group home, nursing home or retirement community. E1d b. The site of the proposed action is currently undergoing remediation. E1g, E1h c. There is a completed emergency spill remediation, or a completed environmental site remediation on, or adjacent to, the site of the proposed action. E1g, E1h d. The site of the action is subject to an institutional control limiting the use of the property (e.g., easement or deed restriction). E1g, E1h e. The proposed action may affect institutional control measures that were put in place to ensure that the site remains protective of the environment and human health. E1g, E1h f. The proposed action has adequate control measures in place to ensure that future generation, treatment and/or disposal of hazardous wastes will be protective of the environment and human health. D2t g. The proposed action involves construction or modification of a solid waste management facility. D2q, E1f h. The proposed action may result in the unearthing of solid or hazardous waste. D2q, E1f i. The proposed action may result in an increase in the rate of disposal, or processing, of solid waste. D2r, D2s j. The proposed action may result in excavation or other disturbance within 2000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. E1f, E1g E1h k. The proposed action may result in the migration of explosive gases from a landfill site to adjacent off site structures. E1f, E1g l. The proposed action may result in the release of contaminated leachate from the project site. D2s, E1f, D2r m. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________  17. Consistency with Community Plans The proposed action is not consistent with adopted land use plans. † NO † YES (See Part 1. C.1, C.2. and C.3.) If “Yes”, answer questions a - h. If “No”, go to Section 18. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action’s land use components may be different from, or in sharp contrast to, current surrounding land use pattern(s). C2, C3, D1a E1a, E1b b. The proposed action will cause the permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located to grow by more than 5%. C2 c. The proposed action is inconsistent with local land use plans or zoning regulations. C2, C2, C3 d. The proposed action is inconsistent with any County plans, or other regional land use plans. C2, C2 e. The proposed action may cause a change in the density of development that is not supported by existing infrastructure or is distant from existing infrastructure. C3, D1c, D1d, D1f, D1d, Elb f. The proposed action is located in an area characterized by low density development that will require new or expanded public infrastructure. C4, D2c, D2d D2j g. The proposed action may induce secondary development impacts (e.g., residential or commercial development not included in the proposed action) C2a h. Other: _____________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 18. Consistency with Community Character The proposed project is inconsistent with the existing community character. † NO † YES (See Part 1. C.2, C.3, D.2, E.3) If “Yes”, answer questions a - g. If “No”, proceed to Part 3. Relevant Part I Question(s) No, or small impact may occur Moderate to large impact may occur a. The proposed action may replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures, or areas of historic importance to the community. E3e, E3f, E3g b. The proposed action may create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire) C4 c. The proposed action may displace affordable or low-income housing in an area where there is a shortage of such housing. C2, C3, D1f D1g, E1a d. The proposed action may interfere with the use or enjoyment of officially recognized or designated public resources. C2, E3 e. The proposed action is inconsistent with the predominant architectural scale and character. C2, C3 f. Proposed action is inconsistent with the character of the existing natural landscape. C2, C3 E1a, E1b E2g, E2h g. Other impacts: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________   PRINT FULL FORM Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 - Evaluation of the Magnitude and Importance of Project Impacts and Determination of Significance Part 3 provides the reasons in support of the determination of significance. The lead agency must complete Part 3 for every question in Part 2 where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. Based on the analysis in Part 3, the lead agency must decide whether to require an environmental impact statement to further assess the proposed action or whether available information is sufficient for the lead agency to conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. By completing the certification on the next page, the lead agency can complete its determination of significance. Reasons Supporting This Determination: To complete this section: • Identify the impact based on the Part 2 responses and describe its magnitude. Magnitude considers factors such as severity, size or extent of an impact. • Assess the importance of the impact. Importance relates to the geographic scope, duration, probability of the impact occurring, number of people affected by the impact and any additional environmental consequences if the impact were to occur. • The assessment should take into consideration any design element or project changes. • Repeat this process for each Part 2 question where the impact has been identified as potentially moderate to large or where there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action will not, or may, result in a significant adverse environmental impact. • Provide the reason(s) why the impact may, or will not, result in a significant adverse environmental impact • For Conditional Negative Declarations identify the specific condition(s) imposed that will modify the proposed action so that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result. • Attach additional sheets, as needed. Determination of Significance - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions SEQR Status: † Type 1 † Unlisted Identify portions of EAF completed for this Project: † Part 1 † Part 2 † Part 3 Agency Use Only [IfApplicable] Project : Date : FEAF 2019     Impact on Land/Water: Steep slopes of 50% or more exist throughout the project site, extending both down the banks to the stream as well as on the upland side along the approaches. Temporary soldier pile retaining walls will be installed to limit the extent of disturbance needed for construction. Erosion and sediment controls during construction will include silt fencing, coffer dams and turbidity curtains, among other controls as may be required by NYSDEC. NYSDOT Environmental Ground and Water Protection specifications will also be followed during demolition and construction. Site restoration will include biodegradeable erosion control matting and live staking where appropriate. Impact on Flooding: Hydraulic analyses were performed for the existing and proposed bridges, which determined that the water surface elevation for both the 50- and 100-year storm events are unchanged. As such, the new bridge will not result in any new flooding impacts. Impact on Plants and Animals: The project will disturb between approximately 40 - 80 feet of the land area next to the bridge, which includes a mix of young and mature trees. Of the 76 trees that must be removed to enable construction, 31 are less than 6 inches DBH and only 5 are equal to or above 20-inch DBH. Tree removals will be offset by the planting of 99 new trees. Since part of the project area must remain cleared for continued access and maintenance of the bridge, approximately half of the trees will be planted offsite. To prevent potential impacts to endangered bats that may be roosting in these trees, all tree removals will occur between November 1st and March 31st in accordance NYSDEC guidelines. Impact on Historic and Archeological Resources: SHPO concurred that the bridge must be replaced for long-term safety and has no concerns regarding archaeological resources. A Historic American Engineering Record Level II Documentation has been prepared for the bridge. In addition, the historic plaque and certain components of the original bridge will be salvaged and set aside for preservation options. The new bridge will replicate the truss design. The project is not adjacent to and will not affect the Old Croton Aqueduct. Impact on Open Space: While there will be no reduction in open space, a village trail that connects to Croton Gorge Trail will not be accessible during construction. The trail connection will be restored following construction, which is targeted to begin in the fall and conclude by the following summer. Impact on Critical Environmental Areas (CEA): The project area is in the County's Croton Point Park and River CEA, which was designated for its geological, archaeological and ecological significance. It also encompasses an underlying aquifer that provides drinking water to the Village of Croton. As the project involves replacement of a bridge in its existing location with appropriate construction mitigation and restoration, there will be no significant adverse impacts as it relates to the CEA and is consistent in general with the Village of Croton's LWRP. Impact on Transportation: The bridge replacement will restore a vital corridor between the Town and Village, reducing extended travel times currently experienced by school buses and emergency vehicles due to the closure of the existing bridge, along with reducing associated energy consumption and carbon emissions. Widening of the bridge to provide 2-way traffic as well as pedestrian lanes will improve safety and encourage non-motorized uses. RB03W June 2025 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF, as noted, plus this additional support information and considering both the magnitude and importance of each identified potential impact, it is the conclusion of the as lead agency that: † A. This project will result in no significant adverse impacts on the environment, and, therefore, an environmental impact statement need not be prepared. Accordingly, this negative declaration is issued. † B. Although this project could have a significant adverse impact on the environment, that impact will be avoided or substantially mitigated because of the following conditions which will be required by the lead agency: There will, therefore, be no significant adverse impacts from the project as conditioned, and, therefore, this conditioned negative declaration is issued. A conditioned negative declaration may be used only for UNLISTED actions (see 6 NYCRR 617.7(d)). † C. This Project may result in one or more significant adverse impacts on the environment, and an environmental impact statement must be prepared to further assess the impact(s) and possible mitigation and to explore alternatives to avoid or reduce those impacts. Accordingly, this positive declaration is issued. Name of Action: Name of Lead Agency: Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Title of Responsible Officer: Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency: Date: Signature of Preparer (if different from Responsible Officer) Date: For Further Information: Contact Person: Telephone Number: E-mail: For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a copy of this Notice is sent to: Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located (e.g., Town / City / Village of) Other involved agencies (if any) Applicant (if any) Environmental Notice Bulletin: http://www.dec.ny.gov/enb/enb.html  Quaker Bridge Road Bridge Replacement (RB03W) Malika Vanderberg Clerk and Chief Administrative Officer, Westchester County Board of Legislators June 26, 2025 David S. Kvinge, Assistant Commissioner, Westchester County Department of Planning 148 Martine Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601 914-995-2089 dsk2@WestchesterCountyNY.gov PRINT FULL FORM ATTACHMENT B: PLANS CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING (ANSI B) 11X17 06/06/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/5/2025 N:\Projects\2024\124-296 Westchester Co - Quaker Bridge Replacement\Working\CADD\dgn connect_2023\124-296_cpb_gen_01.dgn FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 2:46:16 PM morrimm TM 79.06-2-3 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION STATE OF NEW YORK LANDS N/F OF TM 79.06-1-2 VILLAGE OF CROTON ON HUDSON LANDS N/F OF WOODS STRUCTURE CONCRETE STONE WING WALL EDGE OF WATER STONE WING WALL L L A W G NI W E G DI R B ASPHALT ASPHALT DRAINAGE RIP RAP POST POST WOODS SIGN CORTLANDT TOWN OF LIMIT 30 VIL. SPEED 15 TONS & WEIGHT LIMIT STONE LINED DITCH PARKING NO SIGN STREET BRIDGE WING WALL BORING BORING BORING BORING 40' 1" = 20' ROAD QUAKER BRIDGE POST ROAD TO ALBANY RIDGE ROAD TO QUAKER ROAD EAST QUAKER BRIDGE TO RTE 129 TO BE REMOVED SUPERSTRUCTURE EXISTING STA. M 2+94.61 BRGS. ¡ STA. 3+94.61 BRGS. ¡ UTILITIES REMAIN EXISTING OVERHEAD BRGS. ¡ BRGS. TO ¡ 100'-0" PLAN ELEVATION A-A ROAD QUAKER BRIDGE CONCRETE BARRIER (TYP.) PROPOSED SINGLE SLOPE GRID NORTH , STA. LINE, AND H.C.L. ¡ QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD EAST STA M 2+91.86 BEGIN BRIDGE STA M 3+97.36 END BRIDGE , STA. LINE, AND H.C.L. ¡ QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD STA. 3+94.61 EXP. BRGS. ¡ ORGINAL GROUND CONCRETE WINGWALL (TYP.) PROPOSED CAST-IN-PLACE FLOW CROTON RIVER STA. 2+94.61 FIX BRGS. ¡ A A GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION DATUM EL. 10.00 CONCRETE WINGWALL (TYP.) PROPOSED CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE BARRIER (TYP.) PROPOSED SINGLE SLOPE 5'-0" SHOULDER TRAVEL WAY 11'-0" TRAVEL WAY 11'-0" OUT TO OUT 31'-4" CLEAR 28'-0" BOT. FTG EL. 21.25 BOT. FTG EL. 25.25 SEAT EL. 39.53 SEAT EL. 42.60 EL. 36.50 100'-0" SPAN 1'-0" SHOULDER AZ. 132°15'0.26" AZ. 42°15'0.22" PROPOSED GRADE INVENTORY OPERATING LOAD RATING (LRFR) HL-93 HL-93 RF=** RF=** ** TO BE PROVIDED BY TRUSS MANUFACTURER LOW CHORD EL. 41.44 ITEM 551.30 (TYP.) PROPOSED MICROPILES, HYDRAULIC DATA DRAINAGE AREA RECURRENCY INTERVAL (YEARS) PEAK DISCHARGE / POINT OF MAX. BACKWATER HIGH WATER ELEVATION AT EXISTING PROPOSED FLOOD BASIC FLOOD DESIGN 377 SQ. MILES 34.6 33.2 34.6 34.51 (FT. S) r 15,600 13,080 AVG. VELOCITY THRU STRUCT. @ DESIGN FLOOD 14.6 FT./SEC. OF TRUSS (TYP.) ¡ ITEM 568.70 (TYP.) TRANSITION BRIDGE RAILING, DHW EL. 33.2 (50 - YR STORM) FILL LIMITS APPROXIMATE ITEM 620.03 STONE FILLING (LIGHT) ITEM 620.05 STONE FILLING (HEAVY) LEGEND: ABUTMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED CAST-IN-PLACE ENDS STA. M 2+68.85 APPROACH PAVEMENT BEGINS STA. M 4+26.67 APPROACH PAVEMENT TO BE REPLACED EXISTING CULVERT BEGINS STA. S 2+07.07 APPROACH PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING SUBSTRUCTURE TO REMAIN EXISTING CULVERT ST-01 (STONE BEDDING) (TYP.) APPROACH DRAINAGE CONCRETE FOOTING (TYP.) PROPOSED CAST-IN-PLACE OHW EL. 28.25 OHW EL. 28.25' OHW EL. 28.25' 35'-6" ¡ TRUSS TO ¡ TRUSS 56-02-R-221-0 CONCRETE PILES, ITEM 551.11 (TYP.) PROPOSED CAST-IN-PLACE 13'-6" EL. 25.00 EL. 28.75 8'-0" EL. 26.00 EL. 30.00 1 ON 1.5 1 ON 1.5 AZ. 42°15'0.22" M 2+54.22 PCC M 2+90.48 PT M 3+97.40 PC M 4+50.79 PT M 2+00 M 3+00 M 4+00 S 2+00 S 2+00 HEAD WALL CONC. W 5 P.P. =46.62 INV. =49.95 INV. =43.13 INV. =43.20 INV. INV.=44.40 GRATE=45.80 SLOT DRAIN VAULT DRAINAGE 12" PVC 15" CMP 18" CMP =41.7 INV. PERMANENT IMPACTS BELOW OHW BUFFER LINE ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE TEMPORARY IMPACTS BELOW OHW PERMANENT BUFFER IMPACTS TEMPORARY BUFFER IMPACTS 3348560) E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:34:41 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W ¢ £ ¡ § ¡ E EMH G GP GSB GV HYD LP LPG PP SA SMH ST T TCB TELBOX TEL P TMH CTV W WSB WV AHEAD AZIMUTH BACK BASELINE BEARING CENTERLINE CURVE TO SPIRAL SUPERELEVATION RATE (CROSS SLOPE) EQUALITY EXTERNAL HORIZONTAL CONTROL LINE HEADLIGHT SIGHT DISTANCE LENGTH OF CIRCULAR CURVE LENGTH OF SPIRAL LENGTH OF VERTICAL CURVE CENTER CORRECTION OF VERTICAL CURVE MAIN LINE POINT OF CURVATURE POINT OF INTERSECTION POINT ON LINE PASSING SIGHT DISTANCE POINT OF TANGENT POINT OF VERTICAL CURVE POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION POINT OF VERTICAL TANGENT RADIUS SPIRAL TO CURVE STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE SPIRAL TO TANGENT STATION TANGENT LENGTH THEORETICAL GRADE LINE TANGENT TO SPIRAL VERTICAL CURVE ELECTRIC ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS GUY POLE GAS SERVICE BOX (HOUSE LINE) GAS VALVE (MAIN LINE) HYDRANT LIGHT POLE LOW PRESSURE GAS POWER POLE SANITARY SEWER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER TELEPHONE TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX TELEPHONE BOX TELEPHONE POLE TELEPHONE MANHOLE CABLE TELEVISION WATER WATER SERVICE BOX (HOUSE LINE) WATER VALVE (MAIN LINE) ALIGNMENT SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION HAND AUGER DRILLING MUD HOLLOW FLIGHT AUGER POWER AUGER PROBE PERCOLATION TEST HOLE TO BE DEFINED AT THE TIME OF EXPLORATION SEISMIC POINT TEST PIT BRIDGE CUT DAM FILL CULVERT WALL AH CP DA DM DN FH PA PH PT SP B C D F K W X IS MADE BE DEFINED AT THE TIME THE EXPLORATION TO BE USED IF ONE OF THE ABOVE CANNOT ABUT AOBE ASPH BDY BLDG BM CC CONC CONST CR D DM DWY EP ES FP FD FL GAR GR HO HWY IP MB MON N&W OG O/H P PAV'T PE PED POLE POR RR RTE ROW FEE WO/A ABUTMENT AS ORDERED BY ENGINEER ASPHALT BOUNDARY BUILDING BENCH MARK CENTER TO CENTER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION COUNTY ROAD DEED DISTANCE DIRECT MEASUREMENT DRIVEWAY EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF SHOULDER FENCE POST FOUNDATION FENCE LINE GARAGE GRAVEL HOUSE HIGHWAY IRON PIN OR IRON PIPE MAILBOX MONUMENT NAIL AND WASHER ORIGINAL GROUND OVERHEAD PARCEL PAVEMENT PERMANENT EASEMENT PEDESTRIAN POLE PROPERTY LINE PORCH RAILROAD ROUTE RIGHT OF WAY TOPOGRAPHY (MISCELLANEOUS) RW SH SHLDR RETAINING WALL STATE HIGHWAY SHOULDER BOTTOM OF BANK (STREAM) BOTTOM OF CURB BOTTOM OF OPENING CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE CATCH BASIN CAST IRON PIPE CENTERLINE OF STREAM CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CONCRETE PIPE BB BC BO CAP CB CIP CMP CP CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE CULVERT DIAMETER DRAINAGE MANHOLE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PIPE DITCH CROSSING EXTREME HIGH WATER ELEVATION ELEVATION EXTREME LOW WATER END SECTION HEADWALL INVERT MANHOLE MEAN HIGH WATER ORDINARY HIGH WATER ORDINARY LOW WATER REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE TOP OF BANK (STREAM) TOP OF CURB TOP OF GRATE VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE CSP CULV DIA DMH DS D'XING EHW EL ELEV ELW ES HW INV MH MHW OHW OLW RCP TB TC TG VCP SPK ST STK STY SW TE TO U/G WW SPIKE STREET STAKE STORY SIDEWALK TEMPORARY EASEMENT TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY UNDERGROUND WING WALL AH AZ BK BRG CS e EQ EXT HCL HSD L LS LVC E PC PI POL PSD PT PVC PVI PVT R SC SSD ST STA T TGL TS VC FEE ACQUISITION WITHOUT ACCESS FEE FEE ACQUISITION ABBR. REPLACE ABBREVIATION "AB" WITH: ABBR. ABBR. ABBR. ABBR. UTILITIES TOPOGRAPHY (DRAINAGE) 4 INCHES CASED DRILL HOLE 1 INCH SAMPLER (RETRACTABLE PLUG) 2‚ INCHES CASED DRILL HOLE SICPP SMOOTH INTERIOR CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE STRM RP TP SQUARE FEET GALLON ' mi lb LB MI (PLANS) SYMBOL STANDARD (SPECS/PROPOSAL) NOMENCLATURE: EQUIVALENT ftq YDr CUBIC YARD CY MILES ACRES LINEAR FEET TON TON TON GAL POUND GAL SF AC AC QUANTITIES SHEET ESTIMATE OF ITEM PAYMENT UNIT: " - INCHES YDq SQUARE YARD SY LF CONE PENETROMETER DA, DM, DN, AND FH WITH: ABBREVIATION "C" IN CATEGORIES: INDEX AND ABBREVATIONS IND-01 56-02-G-203-0 NO. SHEET DESCRIPTION NUMBER DWG NUMBER DPW COVER SHEET COV 56-02-T-202-0 INDEX & ABBREVIATIONS IND-01 56-02-G-203-0 LEGEND POINT SYMBOLS LEG-01 56-02-G-204-0 LEGEND LINE SYMBOLS LEG-02 56-02-G-205-0 GENERAL NOTES - 1 GNN-01 56-02-G-206-0 GENERAL NOTES - 2 GNN-02 56-02-G-207-0 ESTIMATE OF QUANTITIES & BASELINE TIES BLT-01 56-02-G-208-0 MAINTENANCE JURISTICTION PLAN AND TABLE MJP-01 56-02-R-209-0 WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES MPP-01 56-02-R-210-0 DETOUR PLAN MPP-02 56-02-R-211-0 HIGHWAY GENERAL PLAN GNP-01 56-02-R-212-0 HIGHWAY TYPICAL SECTIONS TYP-01 56-02-R-213-0 PROFILE - QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD PRO-01 56-02-R-214-0 PROFILE - QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD EAST PRO-02 56-02-R-215-0 GRADING PLAN GRD-01 56-02-R-216-0 LANDSCAPE PLAN LAP-01 56-02-R-217-0 LANDSCAPING DETAILS LAD-01 56-02-R-218-0 LANDSCAPING NOTES LAN-01 56-02-R-219-0 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS & TABLES MSD-01 56-02-R-220-0 GENERAL PLAN AND ELEVATION ST-01 56-02-R-221-0 TYPICAL BRIDGE SECTIONS ST-02 56-02-R-222-0 BORING LOCATION PLAN ST-03 56-02-B-223-0 BORING LOGS (1 OF 8) ST-04 56-02-B-224-0 BORING LOGS (2 OF 8) ST-05 56-02-B-225-0 BORING LOGS (3 OF 8) ST-06 56-02-B-226-0 BORING LOGS (4 OF 8) ST-07 56-02-B-227-0 BORING LOGS (5 OF 8) ST-08 56-02-B-228-0 BORING LOGS (6 OF 8) ST-09 56-02-B-229-0 BORING LOGS (7 OF 8) ST-10 56-02-B-230-0 BORING LOGS (8 OF 8) ST-11 56-02-B-231-0 EARTHWORK PLAN ST-12 56-02-S-232-0 EARTHWORK SECTIONS ST-13 56-02-S-233-0 EXCAVATION SUPPORT WALL PLAN AND ELEVATION (1 OF 2) ST-14 56-02-S-234-0 EXCAVATION SUPPORT WALL PLAN AND ELEVATION (2 OF 2) ST-15 56-02-S-235-0 ABUTMENT PILE LAYOUT PLAN ST-16 56-02-S-236-0 BEGIN ABUTMENT PLAN AND ELEVATION ST-17 56-02-S-237-0 BEGIN ABUTMENT REINFORCEMENT PLAN AND SECTION ST-18 56-02-S-238-0 END ABUTMENT PLAN AND ELEVATION ST-19 56-02-S-239-0 END ABUTMENT REINFORCEMENT PLAN AND SECTION ST-20 56-02-S-240-0 ABUTMENT DETAILS (1 OF 2) ST-21 56-02-S-241-0 ABUTMENT DETAILS (2 OF 2) ST-22 56-02-S-242-0 WINGWALL SECTIONS ST-23 56-02-S-243-0 ELASTOMERIC FIXED BEARINGS ST-24 56-02-S-244-0 ELASTOMERIC EXPANSION BEARINGS ST-25 56-02-S-245-0 TRANSVERSE SECTION ST-26 56-02-S-246-0 TRUSS FRAMING PLAN ST-27 56-02-S-247-0 TRUSS DETAILS ST-28 56-02-S-248-0 SUPERSTRUCTURE SLAB PLAN ST-29 56-02-S-249-0 APPROACH SLAB PLAN ST-30 56-02-S-250-0 BARRIER AND RAILING PLAN ST-31 56-02-S-251-0 SINGLE SLOPE CONCRETE BARRIER DETAILS (1 OF 3) ST-32 56-02-S-252-0 SINGLE SLOPE CONCRETE BARRIER DETAILS (2 OF 3) ST-33 56-02-S-253-0 SINGLE SLOPE CONCRETE BARRIER DETAILS (3 OF 3) ST-34 56-02-S-254-0 TRANSITION RAIL DETAILS (1 OF 2) ST-35 56-02-S-255-0 TRANSITION RAIL DETAILS (2 OF 2) ST-36 56-02-S-256-0 DRAINAGE DETAILS ST-37 56-02-S-257-0 INDEX TOTAL NUMBER OF SHEETS: 56 STANDARD SHEETS 203-04 603-01 604-02 619-02 619-12 655-06 203-05 603-02 606-09 619-10 655-04 685-01 402-01 603-04 619-01 619-11 E E X C R S L IO CBP CBPOL CBSP CBTP ACC ACOGO ACS AEQN AEQNAHD AEQNBK AEVT APC APCC API APOB APOC APOE APOL APOS APOT APOVC APOVT APRC APT APVC APVCC APVI APVRC APVT ASC ASPI ASTS AVEVT AVHIGH AVLOW CENTER OF CURVATURE COGO CURVE TO SPIRAL EQUATION EQUATION AHEAD EQUATION BACK EVENT STATION SPIRAL TO CURVE SPIRAL TO SPIRAL SPIRAL TO TANGENT TANGENT TO SPIRAL DRILL HOLE ELEVATION, SPOT FLAG POLE MAILBOX PAPER BOX ROCK, BOULDER SHRUB, CONIFEROUS SHRUB, DECIDUOUS TREE, CONIFEROUS TREE, DECIDUOUS TREE, STUMP SINGLE POST DELINEATORS REFERENCE MARKERS GDH LELS LFP LMB LPB LPST LRB LSHC LSHD LTC LTD LTS LUKP SDEL SRM S CABINET & PAD CCTV SITE CDPD TRANSCEIVER CELL PHONE TOWER CONDUIT JACK OR BORING CONTROLLER CABINET COMMUNICATION PULL BOX CONDUIT TURNING DOWN CONDUIT TURNING UP DEFAULT TRANSMITTAL READER FUSION SPLICE HAR ADVISORY SIGN HAR SITE LOAD CENTER MECHANICAL SPLICE PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD RAMP METER SOLAR PANEL WEIGHT IN MOTION DETECTOR WIRELESS VIDEO REPEATER WIRELESS VIDEO RECEIVER WIRELESS VIDEO TRANSMITTER PERM. OVERHEAD VMS PERM. VMS ACCOU. SPEED/COUNT SNSR.S IASCTS ICABPAD ICCTV ICDPD ICELLT ICJB ICNTLCAB ICPB ICTD ICTU ICVTRT IEZR IEZTR IFOXCAB IFUSSPL IHARADV IHARST IMECSPL IMSCS IMSCTS IMT IOVHVMS IPASCS IPEDS IPSS IPVMS IRM IRWIS ISP ISST ITDB ITP IVTRT IWIMD IWVR IWVTT IWVRC ILC SPM PARKING METER SPREAD SPECT. TRANSCEIVER TELEPHONE DEMARCATION BLK SUBSURFACE TEMP. PROBE MICRO SPEED & COUNT SENSOR POST, SINGLE PT., WALL LOCATION PT., TREE W/ WIRE PT., STAKE PT., RAILROAD SPIKE PT., SPIKE PT., NAIL PT., MONUMENT, MISC. PT., MONUMENT PT., IRON ROD PT., IRON PIPE PT., FENCE LOCATION PT., DRILL HOLE HISTORICAL, BLDG. CORNERS HIGHWAY BNDRY., APPROX. HIGHWAY BNDRY, PT. DEED LINE, TYPE 1 DEED LINE, TYPE 2 DEED LINE, TYPE 3 DEED LINE, TYPE 4 DEED LINE, TYPE 5 EASEMENT, EXISTING BOX, JUNCTION BOX, PULL BOX BOX, SPLICE MICROCOMPUTER CABINET PED POLE SIGNAL HEADS SIGNAL POLE MDL1P MHBCP MPCC MPDH MPF MPIP MPIR MPM MPMM MPN MPRS MPSP MPST MPTW MPWL TCMC TCPP TCSH TCSP C MJCP PT., JURIS. CITY PT., CROSS CUT IDEFAULT POINT OF CURVATURE POINT OF INTERSECTION POINT OF BEGINNING POINT OF CURVATURE POINT OF END POINT ON LINE POINT ON SPIRAL POINT ON TANGENT POINT ON VERTICAL CURVE POINT ON VERTICAL TANGENT POINT ON REVERSE CURVE POINT OF TANGENCY POINT OF VERTICAL CURVATURE POINT OF VERT. INTERSECTION POINT OF VERT. REVERSE CURVE POINT OF VERTICAL TANGENCY SPIRAL POINT OF INTERSECTION VERTICAL EVENT POINT VERTICAL HIGH POINT BASELINE, POINT BASELINE, POINT ON LINE UNKNOWN POINT COMM. VEH. ROAD TRANSCEIVER E-ZPASS READER MICROWAVE TRANSCEIVER PORT. ACCOU. SPD & CNT. SENSOR VEHICLE TO RDWY TRANSCEIVER PORT. SPEED & COUNT SENSOR FIBER OPTIC X-CONNECT CABINET PAVEMENT SURFACE SENSOR RDWY WEATHER INFO. SENSOR GUIDE RAIL, ANCHOR GUIDE POST, SINGLE RGA RGP CPBM BENCHMARK POINT, HORIZ. PHOTOGRAMMETRY POINT, SURVEY MARKER, PERM. CPV CPSM CPH ATS AST MDL2P MDL3P MDL4P MDL5P MEEP MHBP TCBJ TCBP TCBS POINT OF C0MPOUND CURVATURE POINT OF VERT. CMPND CURVE VERTICAL LOW POINT BASELINE, SPUR POINT BASELINE, TIE POINT MHBAP POINT, VERT., PHOTOGRAMMETRY WETLAND FLAG EWFG RFM A B A CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:34:45 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W BRIDGE, SCUPPER EASEMENT, PERM., SHAPE EASEMENT, PERM., APPROX. EASEMENT, PERM., BACK LINE EASEMENT, PERM., BACK LINE MEPAP_P EIOP_P ADPI_P DETOUR, POINT OF INTERSECT. DETOUR, POINT ON LINE BSC LTW_P TREE, WELL OR WALL SINGLE POST, PROPOSED BACK TO BACK, PROPOSED SRSC3 SRSC4 SRSCT2 SRSCT4 SRSI SRSN2 SRSN3 SRSS2 SRSS3 SRSS4 FEE ACQUISITION, SHAPE MPBC PT., BUILDING CORNER MFS_P_T MEPS_P_T EASEMENT, PERMANENT METS_P_T EASEMENT, TEMPORARY METS_P_T OCCUPANCY, TEMPORARY MFS_P_T FEE ACQUISITION TWZBCD_P RES_P ELEVATION, SPOT TWZCMS_P CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN (PVMS) TWZFLG_P FLAGGER TWZFT_P FLAG TREE TWZIA_P TWZSDT_P TWZAP_P ARROW PANEL TWZAPC_P ARROW PANEL, CAUTION MODE TWZAPT_P ARROW PANEL, TRAILER OR SUPPORT TWZWVA_P SYMBOL, DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC TWZSDTD_P LUMINAIRE (TEMPORARY) TWZSGN_P SIGN (TEMPORARY) TWZSIG_P TWZWL_P WARNING LIGHT TWZWV_P WORK VEHICLE BARRICADE (TYPE III) TWZLUM_P S_P SB_P SHLD, INTERSTATE SHLD, NATIONAL, 2 DIG. SHLD, NATIONAL, 3 DIG. SHLD, STATE, 2 DIG. SHLD, STATE, 3 DIG. SHLD, STATE, 4 DIG. SHLD, CTY, 123 DIG. SHLD, CTY, 4 DIG. SHLD, CTY TOUR, 1-2 DIG. SHLD, CTY TOUR, 3-4 DIG. STR., INLET PROT., GRAVEL BAG STR., INLET PROT., FILTER LOG STR., INLET PROT., PREFAB. STR., INLET PROT., SILT FENCE STR., INLET, OUTLET PROT. MEPP_P MEPSP_P MFAP_P MFP_P MFSP_P EIPGB_P EIPEFL_P EIPP_P EIPSF_P ADPL_P FEE ACQUISITION, BACK LINE FEE ACQUISITION, APPROX. FEE ACQUISITION W/O ACCESS CRASH CUSHION (TEMPORARY) IMPACT ATTENUATOR / TRAFFIC DETOUR SYMBOL, DIRECTION OF TEMPORARY (TEMPORARY) SIGNAL, TRAFFIC OR PEDESTRIAN MOUNTED ATTENUATOR WORK VEHICLE WITH TRUCK ALIGNMENT TRAP, SEDIMENT LANDSCAPE GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ITS ROW MAPPING TRAFFIC CONTROL UTILITIES ETRS_P CELL DESCRIPTION CELL CELL CELL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION RISER, CONCRETE BOX ERCB NAME NAME NAME NAME DESCRIPTION NAME CELL CELL NAME DESCRIPTION ROW ACQUISITION BRIDGE CONTROL TRAFFIC WORK ZONE ROADWAY SIGNS DRAINAGE GB CULV FL PRFB SF CDPD C C EZ EZ-T XC H M RM SS TC TP WVR V V A A P1 M1 FEE PE M1 P1 TE M1 P1 TO M1 P1 FEE WO/A M1 P1 LEGEND POINT SYMBOLS LEG-01 56-02-G-204-0 DINV DS STRUCTURE, RECTANGULAR INVERT ANTENNAS IANT_P GAS, METER GAS, MANHOLE GAS, LINE MARKER GAS/FUEL PUMP GAS, VALVE GAS, VENT LIGHTING, POLE LIGHTING, POLE, MEDIAN LIGHTING, POLE, PED. MISC. FILLER CAP OIL, LINE MARKER TELEPHONE, LINE MARKER TELEPHONE, MANHOLE CABLE TV, LINE MARKER CABLE TV, PULL BOX UNKNOWN, MANHOLE UNKNOWN, VALVE WATER, FIRE HYDRANT WATER, METER WATER, MANHOLE WATER, VALVE WATER, WELL UGM UGMH UGLM UGP UGV UGVT ULP ULPM ULPP UMFC UOLM UP UPD UPL USMH UTB UTLM UTMH UTVPB UUJB UUMH UUVL UWFH UWM UWMH UWV UWW UNKNOWN, JUNCTION BOX UTVLM UUB UNKNOWN, BOX UUPB UNKNOWN, PULL BOX UUVT UNKNOWN, VENT UUW UNKNOWN, WELL ELECTRIC, BOX ELECTRIC, METER ELECTRIC, MANHOLE ELECTRIC, POLE, TRANS. UEB UEM UEMH UEPT DSMTXX_P POLE, WITH UTILITY POLE, DEAD (NO UTILITY) POLE, WITH LIGHT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TELEPHONE, BOOTH DSI STRUCTURE, INVERT DSM STRUCTURE, MANHOLE DSR STRUCTURE, ROUND DST"X"CB_P STRUCTURE, RECT., TYPE "X" DST"X"_P "XX" = 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 TYPE "XX" STRUCTURE, MANHOLE, TYPE "X" STRUCTURE, RECT., WITH CURB "X" = I, K, L, M, O, P, U "X" = F, G, N, O, P, R G T W FP E E G C A A P LC PM M VMS PA PVMS RWIS WIM E O S P T C U W W G E E X C R S L IO AC CONTROL (CENTERLINE) CB CBPR ESFL ECT EDMC CURTAIN, TURBIDITY BASELINE BASELINE, PROJECTION SHEET PILING EFNS EFNV EWFS EWM EWS WETLAND, STATE WETLAND, MITIGATION AREA WETLAND, FEDERAL FENCE, VEGETATION FENCE, SILT LABL LAHR LAPB LAWA LAWE LFNC LTRC LTRD LWR LWS AREA, BRUSH LINE AREA, HEDGE ROW AREA, PLANTING BED AREA, WATERS EDGE FENCE TREE ROW, CONIFEROUS WALL, RETAINING TREE ROW, DECIDUOUS WALL, STONE MDL MEE HIGHWAY BOUNDARY, W/ ACCESS EASEMENT, EXISTING DEED LINE RG RRPSS BROKEN LINE TCSW SIGNAL, SPAN WIRE SM SSO SSOC MULTIPLE POST STRUCTURE, OVERHEAD RRS RUMBLE STRIP STB* EWF BR RAIL BSHT FENCE, SILT & VEGETATION EFNSV WETLAND, FEDERAL AND STATE SBLB BILLBOARDS STRUCTURE, OVHD. CANTILEVER AREA, WOODED AREA OUTLINE LWH WALL, H PILE MHB MHBA HIGHWAY BOUNDARY, APPROX. MHBW HWY BOUNDARY, FACE OF WALL MHBWOA HIGHWAY BOUNDARY, W/O ACCESS MJC JURISDICTION, CITY MJCY JURISDICTION, COUNTY MJHD JURISDICTION, HISTORIC DISTRICT MJLL JURIS., (GREAT, MILITARY) LOT LINE MJN JURISDICTION, NATION MJPB JURISDICTION, PUBLIC LANDS MJS JURISDICTION, STATE MJT JURISDICTION, TOWN MJV JURISDICTION, VILLAGE MPL PROPERTY LOT LINE PROPERTY LOT LINE, APPROXIMATE MPLA MSL SUB LOT LINE GUIDE RAIL, MISCELLANEOUS RGB GUIDE RAIL, BOX BEAM RGBM GUIDE RAIL, BOX BEAM, MEDIAN RGC GUIDE RAIL, CABLE RGCB GUIDE RAIL, CONCRETE BARRIER RGW GUIDE RAIL, W BEAM RGWM GUIDE RAIL, W BEAM, MEDIAN RPB PARKING BUMPER RRC RAIL ROAD, CATENARY RRER RAIL ROAD, 3RD RAIL RAIL, PHOTO, SMALL SCALE RRSSS RAIL, SURVEY, SMALL SCALE DOUBLE BROKEN LINE STDB* STDL* DOTTED LINE LONG STDS* DOTTED LINE SHORT STFB* FULL BARRIER LINE STH* HATCH LINE STRCT ROUNDABOUT, CAT TRACKS STRYL ROUNDABOUT, YIELD LINE STSB STOP BAR SOLID, EDGE X WALK, LADDER LINE * = W (WHITE) OR Y (YELLOW) FILTER, SEDIMENT LOG STSE* MHA HISTORICAL, ACQUISITION STXLB X WALK, LADDER BAR LINE STXL DAM, COFFER FL FW FW SW WM SW PE HB AHB HB W / OA PL PL A Z 3R L B CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:34:46 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W LIGHTS BARRIER, TEMPORARY, W/ WARNING COVERING PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL OR DO NOT HAVE CORRESPONDING EXISTING FEATURES. FEATURES SHOWN AT THE HEAVIER WEIGHT ARE PROPOSED ONLY AND 6. SHOULD BE LABELED ON THE PLANS. SYMBOLOGY (SUCH AS THE PAVEMENT EDGE, PAVEMENT EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY) AND MAPPING FEATURES NOT INCLUDED ON THE LEGEND SHEET DO NOT HAVE A UNIQUE 5. ON B SIZE DRAWINGS). EXCLUDING LINE WEIGHT. LINE WEIGHT FOR PROPOSED FEATURES IS THICKER (0.015 in PROPOSED FEATURE SYMBOLOGY IS IDENTICAL TO EXISTING FEATURE SYMBOLOGY 4. PROPOSED FEATURES. FEATURES SHOWN ON THE LEGEND AS EXISTING FEATURES ALSO HAVE CORRESPONDING 3. UTILITY LINES, ETC.) OR POINT (SIGN, UTILITY POLE, ETC.). FEATURES ARE SHOWN AS EITHER LINEAR (ROADWAY GUIDERAIL, ROADWAY SIDEWALK, 2. THE LEGEND ILLUSTRATES MAPPING FEATURES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED). 1. ALIGNMENT CONTROL DRAINAGE ENVIRONMENTAL LANDSCAPE ROW MAPPING STRIPING TRAFFIC CONTROL AD_P AT_P DETOUR DDG_P DDP_P DDS_P DFL_P FLOW LINE DITCH, STONE LINED DITCH, PAVED INVERT DITCH, GRASS LINED EWAA_P WETLAND, ADJACENT AREA EDMEC_P EDMPC_P EDMSC_P LFILL_P FILL LIMIT RRPLS_P RRSLS_P TRANSITION CONTROL SIGNS STYLE NAME DESCRIPTION BRIDGE DESCRIPTION NAME STYLE MEP_P EASEMENT, PERMANENT MEPA_P EASEMENT, PERMANENT, APPROX. MET_P EASEMENT, TEMPORARY META_P EASEMENT. TEMPORARY, APPROX. MF_P MFA_P FEE ACQUISITION, APPROXIMATE MFS_P FEE ACQUISITION, SHAPE ROADWAY DESCRIPTION NAME STYLE GUIDE POST RAIL, PHOTO, LARGE SCALE RAIL, SURVEY, LARGE SCALE RGP_P STPB* PARTIAL BARRIER LINE UTILITIES FEE ACQUISITION, W/ ACCESS LCUT_P CUT LIMIT STYLE NAME DESCRIPTION RCZ_P BARRIER, TEMPORARY TRAFFIC WORK ZONE TWZBT_P CHANNELIZING DEVICE TWZCD_P TWZPMRC_P TWZBTWL_P MFWOA_P FEE ACQUISITION, W/O ACCESS CLEAR ZONE EDMGSC_P DAM, EARTHEN CHECK BAG CHECK DAM, GRAVEL BAG/SAND DAM, PREFABRICATED CHECK DAM, STONE CHECK AA PE APE TE ATE FEE AFEE FEE W / OA CZ LEGEND LINE SYMBOLS LEG-02 56-02-G-205-0 DCP DCP_P CULVERT PIPE (DIR) CULVERT PIPE UC DSSD SLOTTED DRAIN CONDUIT, UNDERGROUND UCH CONDUIT, HANGING UCO CONDUIT, OVERHEAD UE ELECTRIC LINE, UNDERGROUND UEH ELECTRIC LINE, HANGING UEO ELECTRIC LINE, OVERHEAD UESS ELECTRIC, SUBSTATIONS UFO FIBER OPTIC, UNDERGROUND UFOH FIBER OPTIC, HANGING UFOO FIBER OPTIC, OVERHEAD UG GAS, UNDERGROUND UGH GAS, HANGING UGO GAS, OVERHEAD UIC INFORM CABLE, UNDERGROUND UICH INFORM CABLE, HANGING OIL LINE, UNDERGROUND UO UOH OIL LINE, HANGING UPBP POLE, BRACE, PUSH BRACE POLE, GUY WIRE USA USAH SANITARY SEWER, HANGING SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND UT TELEPHONE, UNDERGROUND UTH TELEPHONE, HANGING UTO TELEPHONE, OVERHEAD UUU UNKNOWN, UNDERGROUND UUH UNKNOWN, HANGING UUO UNKNOWN, OVERHEAD UW WATER LINE, UNDERGROUND UWH WATER LINE, HANGING UWO WATER LINE, OVERHEAD UETO ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION, OVERHEAD USAF SANITARY SEWER, FORCE MAIN, UGND USAFH SANITARY SEWER, FORCE MAIN, HANG UTV UTVH UTVO CABLE TV, UNDERGROUND CABLE TV, HANGING CABLE TV, OVERHEAD UPGW UNDERDRAIN DUD_P ST ST UD C C OC E E OE OET FO FO OFO G G OG IC IC O O SA SA SAF SAF T T OT CTV CTV OCTV UU UU OUU W W OW ] [ [ ] ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:34:47 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W HIGH VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL LINES ARE IN PROXIMITY TO THIS BRIDGE. CONTAINING MATERIALS HAVE BEEN INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. PLANS OF THE STRUCTURE(S) AND/OR ENCOUNTERED DURING FIELD INSPECTIONS. ALL KNOWN ASBESTOS STRUCTURES CONTAINED IN THIS CONTRACT. THESE MATERIALS WERE NOTED ON THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT MATERIALS CONTAINING ASBESTOS ARE BELIEVED TO EXIST AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ON OR IN CERTAIN ALL SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREPARED IN U.S. CUSTOMARY UNITS. FULLY DIMENSIONED. VISUAL CLARITY. ALL OTHER DETAILS FOR WHICH NO SCALE IS SHOWN ARE DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY AND ARE DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS LABELED AS "NOT TO SCALE" ARE INTENTIONALLY DRAWN NOT TO SCALE FOR DESIGN LIVE LOAD: AASHTO HL - 93. THE LOAD RATINGS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION. VERSION OF THE AASHTO MAINTENANCE MANUAL FOR ROADWAYS AND BRIDGES. THIS BRIDGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES CONTAINED IN THE CURRENT ALL PROVISIONS IN EFFECT AS OF JUNE 2025. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS: NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS - CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS WITH SLABS AT 28 DAYS: f'c = 4,000 psi.) JUNE 2025 (FOR DESIGN PURPOSES, COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE FOR SUBSTRUCTURES AND DECK DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS: NYSDOT LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS WITH ALL PROVISIONS IN EFFECT AS OF GENERAL NOTES: FOUNDATION NOTES: UNIT PRICE BID FOR ITEM 203.03 - EMBANKMENT IN PLACE. THE COST OF WATER USED FOR COMPACTION OF EMBANKMENT IN PLACE MATERIAL SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR ITEM 203.21 - SELECT STRUCTURE FILL. THE COST OF WATER USED FOR COMPACTION OF THE SELECT STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT SIMULTANEOUSLY, ON BOTH SIDES OF THE VERTICAL PAYMENT LINE. EMBANKMENT IN PLACE, ITEM 203.03, AND SELECT STRUCTURE FILL, ITEM 203.21, SHALL BE PLACED SUBSTRUCTURE NOTES: CONTRACT. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR THE VARIOUS CONCRETE ITEMS IN THE THE COST OF ALL JOINT MATERIAL AND WATERSTOPS AT CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, CONTRACTION AND ABUTMENTS AND/OR WINGWALLS SHOULD PREFERABLY BE PLACED MIDWAY BETWEEN THE PEDESTALS. BE PROVIDED WITH SHEAR KEYS AND WATERSTOPS. VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS INTRODUCED IN THE THE ABUTMENTS AND/OR WINGWALLS AT LOCATIONS NOT SHOWN IN THE PLANS. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL THE CONTRACTOR, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY, MAY ELECT TO INTRODUCE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE COSTS FOR THIS WORK IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR THE APPROACH SLAB ITEM. SIDES), §728-06, SHALL BE PLACED ON THE TOP OF THE BACKWALLS OF FIXED AND EXPANSION ABUTMENTS. THE TOP OF BACKWALLS SHALL BE STEEL TROWEL FINISHED. TWO SHEETS OF SHEET GASKET (TREATED BOTH COFFERDAM AND HYDRAULIC NOTES: ELEVATION RATHER THAN A COMPUTED ONE. PREVALENT DURING ONE CONSTRUCTION SEASON FOR MORE THAN 25% OF THE TIME. IT IS AN OBSERVED LOW WATER IS ESTIMATED TO BE 24.30 FT. LOW WATER IS DEFINED AS THE NORMAL LOW WATER ELEVATION RATHER THAN A COMPUTED ONE. IS ALWAYS LESS THAN THE ORDINARY HIGH-WATER ELEVATION AND IT IS USUALLY AN OBSERVED ELEVATION ELEVATION LIKELY TO BE ENCOUNTERED DURING ONE CONSTRUCTION SEASON (EXCLUDING MAJOR FLOODS). IT ORDINARY WATER IS ESTIMATED TO BE 25.75 FT. ORDINARY WATER IS DEFINED AS THE HIGHEST SURFACE WATER OF 2.33 YEARS. SURFACE ELEVATION FOR THE MEAN ANNUAL FLOOD, WHICH IS THE FLOOD THAT HAS A RECURRENCE INTERVAL ORDINARY HIGH-WATER IS ESTIMATED TO BE 28.25 FT. ORDINARY HIGH-WATER IS DEFINED AS THE WATER DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. NO SETTLEMENT BASIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED. AND WATER POLLUTION CONTROL, SUCH AS SEDIMENT FILTER LOGS OR APPROVED EQUAL, MAY BE REQUIRED AS THE STREAMBED AS SHOWN IN THE PLANS AND/OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. TEMPORARY SOIL EROSION DEWATER THE COFFERDAM BY PUMPING THE WATER TO AN APPROVED UPLAND VEGETATED AREA OUTSIDE OF SHALL BE BASED ON ALL OF THE APPLICABLE COFFERDAM ITEMS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. IF MULTIPLE COFFERDAMS ARE REPLACED BY A SINGLE SYSTEM, WHEN APPROVED BY THE COUNTY,PAYMENT MEANS WHEN THE WATER ELEVATION EXCEEDS 28.25 FT. THE COFFERDAM AND TREMIE SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED TO AUTOMATICALLY FLOOD BY NON-MECHANICAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT THE CHANGES TO THE COUNTY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. SHOULD FIELD CONDITIONS REQUIRE A CHANGE IN THE TYPE OF COFFERDAM SYSTEM CALLED FOR IN THE PLANS, SOURCE OF WATER, SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR THE COFFERDAM ITEM. WHEN A COFFERDAM IS USED, THE COST OF DEWATERING THE ENTIRE EXCAVATION, REGARDLESS OF THE WATER FROM ENTERING THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE FURNISHED AND PLACED AT NO COST TO THE COUNTY. EXCAVATION REQUIRING A COFFERDAM, ANY REQUIRED EXTENSIONS TO THE COFFERDAM NECESSARY TO KEEP SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR ELECT TO LAY BACK A PORTION OF THE EXISTING EARTH ADJACENT TO AN SUPERSTRUCTURE NOTES: ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A709, GRADE 50. GALVANIZING NOTES: THE BOLTS. DRILLED HOLES SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL EXCESS MATERIAL THAT PREVENTS THE PROPER INSTALLATION OF CONSTRUCTION MANUAL. ALL BOLTS, NUTS, AND WASHERS SHALL BE GALVANIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW YORK STATE STEEL 565.2025 AND 565.2035. PLATE, SHALL BE METALIZED. THE COST OF METALIZING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR ITEMS ALL EXPOSED STEEL COMPONENTS OF BRIDGE BEARINGS, INCLUDING THE SOLE PLATE AND THE MASONRY COST TO THE COUNTY. DETERMINED TO BE CAUSED BY IMPROPER STORAGE OR SHIPPING OF HDG MATERIALS SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO SHALL BE REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NYS STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL. WHITE RUST THAT IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE INTENDED USE OF THE MEMBER OR HAVE A NEGATIVE VISUAL IMPACT ON THE STRUCTURE EXAMPLES OF NON-RESINOUS WOODS ARE: POPLAR, ASH AND SPRUCE. WHITE RUST THAT IS DETERMINED TO BE SPACERS TO ALLOW VENTILATION AND AVOID MOISTURE BUILD UP, INCLINE MEMBERS TO ALLOW DRAINAGE. FOLLOWS: STORE MATERIALS OFF OF THE GROUND AWAY FROM ALL VEGETATION, USE NON-RESINOUS WOODEN AVOIDED. IF OUTDOOR STORAGE IS UNAVOIDABLE, EXAMPLES OF REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS ARE AS SHOULD BE AVOIDED. STORAGE (OR SHIPPING) OF HDG MATERIALS IN CONTACT WITH ONE ANOTHER SHALL BE GALVANIZED (HDG) MATERIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. STORAGE OF HDG MATERIALS OUTDOORS REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THE PREVENTION OF WET STORAGE STAINING (WHITE RUST) OF HOT-DIP WORKERS. PLAN SHALL SPECIFY THE TYPE OF WALKING/WORKING PRECAUTIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED TO PROTECT THE STUD SHEAR CONNECTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GALVANIZING. THE CONTRACTOR'S WORKER SAFETY STEEL ERECTION NOTES: NEW YORK STATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCM. CALCULATIONS. THE ERECTION DRAWINGS AND STABILITY CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SEALED BY A REGISTERED SHALL BE DOCUMENTED ON THE ERECTION DRAWINGS AND INCLUDED IN THE SUPPORTING STABILITY HAVE BEEN ERECTED AND CROSS FRAMES INSTALLED. THE MEANS AND METHODS USED BY THE CONTRACTOR ALTERNATE PICKING POINTS, OR BY USE OF A HOLDING CRANE UNTIL A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF FLOORBEAMS BY USE OF FALSEWORK, TEMPORARY BRACING, COMPRESSION FLANGE STIFFENING TRUSSES, CHOOSING STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL (SCM). THE TRUSSES FOR THIS BRIDGE SHALL BE STABILIZED DURING ERECTION ERECTION AND CONSTRUCTION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2, SUBSECTION 204 OF THE NEW YORK STATE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE STABILITY OF STRUCTURAL STEEL DURING ALL PHASES OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ACCORDING TO THE AISC MANUAL. DIMENSIONS FOR THICKNESSES OF STEEL ROLLED ANGLE SHAPES AND STRUCTURAL TUBING ARE SHOWN TENSION COMPONENTS OF LIFTING BOXES AND LIFTING FRAMES - END PORTAL FRAMES - SWAY FRAMES - TOP AND BOTTOM LATERAL BRACING - VERTICAL GUSSET PLATES - SPLICE PLATES - CANTILEVER BRACKETS AND TIE PLATES - TENSION FLANGES AND WEBS PLATES OF BASCULE GIRDERS - MINIMUM CHARPY V-NOTCH FRACTURE TOUGHNESS REQUIREMENTS: STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS - CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS, THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS SHALL MEET THE IN ADDITION TO THE STRUCTURAL STEEL ELEMENTS LISTED IN §715-01 - STRUCTURAL STEEL OF THE NYSDOT SUPERSTRUCTURE SLAB NOTES: TARPS OR OTHER BARRIER-TYPE MEANS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE EIC. THE SEALER OR BY PHYSICALLY ISOLATING THE AREA TO BE SPRAYED FROM THE WATERWAY BY THE USE OF WATERWAY. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT SPRAYED SEALER FROM ENTERING THE WATERWAY BY ROLLING SURFACE, SUCH AS SCUPPERS OR OPEN DRAINS SHALL BE COVERED TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SEALER, ANY OPENINGS IN THE SURFACE OF THE BRIDGE DECK OR IN THE WALKING AVAILABLE FOR IMMEDIATE USE MATERIALS TO SOAK UP OR CONTAIN ANY ACCIDENTAL SPILLS. PRIOR TO THE IN A MANNER THAT WILL PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE WATERWAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS REQUIRE MIXING OF THE SEALER PRIOR TO APPLICATION, MIXING SHALL OCCUR CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE WATERWAY BY THE SEALER. IF THE DAYS FOR EACH SUBMISSION, WILL BE ALLOWED UPON RECEIPT OF THE SUBMISSION. AND MATERIALS SHALL APPLY. A REVIEW TIME OF TWO DAYS PER PLACEMENT DRAWING, WITH A MINIMUM OF 15 PROVISIONS OF §557-3.17 - NO BARLIST PROVIDED, OF THE NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS - CONSTRUCTION BARLISTS ARE NOT PROVIDED FOR SUPERSTRUCTURE SLABS, APPROACH SLABS, AND/OR SUBSTRUCTURES. THE NEW BRIDGE DECKS AND BRIDGE DECK OVERLAYS. ONLY PENETRATING TYPE SEALERS SHALL BE USED. SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 559.01 - PROTECTIVE SEALING OF STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ON TOP SURFACES OF NEW SIDEWALKS AND EXPOSED SURFACES OF NEW CONCRETE PARAPETS OR BARRIERS 559.01 - PROTECTIVE SEALING OF STRUCTURAL CONCRETE ON NEW BRIDGE DECKS AND BRIDGE DECK OVERLAYS. TOP SURFACES OF NEW BRIDGE DECKS AND APPROACH SLABS SHALL BE SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM PRICE BID FOR THE BARRIER ITEM. COST OF BARRIER AND ANCHORAGE REINFORCEMENT ORIGINATING IN THE SLAB SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT THE DETAILS FOR THE BARRIER REINFORCEMENT ARE FOR THE SLIP-FORMED OR CAST-IN-PLACE OPTION ONLY. PERMISSION OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NO DEVIATIONS FROM THE HAUNCH DETAILS SHOWN IN THE PLANS WITHOUT THE REMOVAL NOTES: OF THE STRUCTURE'S PAINT PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID. REQUIRED. BECAUSE OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED CONDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE THE CONDITION ON THE ALTERNATIVE CHOSEN, THE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PAINT REMOVAL WASTE ITEM MAY BE THE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL GROUND AND/OR WATERWAY PROTECTION ITEMS WILL BE REQUIRED. DEPENDING FOR THE SUPERSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ITEM(S) (OR THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR THE SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ITEM.) OPERATIONS. THE COST OF REMEDIATING THIS CONDITION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE LUMP SUM PRICE(S) BID PRIOR TO REMOVAL, ENCAPSULATING THE LOOSE PAINT OR REMOVAL OF LOOSE PAINT PRIOR TO DISMANTLING COULD INCLUDE TRANSPORTING AFFECTED MEMBERS IN CLOSED TRUCKS, WRAPPING AFFECTED MEMBERS WORKER LEAD PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1926.62 SHALL BE SATISFIED. REMEDIATION METHODS SHALL FORMULATE AND SUBMIT A METHOD OF REMEDIATING THE CONDITION FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. OR DURING TRANSPORTATION FROM THE SITE UNLESS APPROPRIATE MEASURES ARE TAKEN. THE CONTRACTOR LOOSE AND/OR PEELING PAINT ON STEEL SURFACES MAY BECOME DISLODGED DURING REMOVAL OPERATIONS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF USING THE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PAINT REMOVAL WASTE ITEM. SHALL BE COLLECTED USING THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUND AND/OR WATERWAY PROTECTION ITEM(S). WASTE PRICE BID FOR THE SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ITEM). PAINT WASTE NOT COLLECTED BY VACUUM METHODS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE LUMP SUM PRICE(S) BID FOR THE SUPERSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ITEM(S) (OR THE UNIT CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS. AND §574 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. THE COST OF PAINT REMOVAL SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF §202-3.01 - GENERAL, OF THE NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS - LIMITS AND METHODS FOR THE REMOVAL OF PAINT AT LOCATIONS OF FASTENER REMOVAL OR FLAME CUTTING RECORD PLANS FOR THIS STRUCTURE ARE NOT AVAILABLE. DISPOSED OF USING THE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PAINT REMOVAL WASTE ITEM. COLLECTED USING THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUND AND/OR WATERWAY PROTECTION ITEM(S). WASTE SHALL BE BID FOR THE SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ITEM). PAINT WASTE NOT COLLECTED BY VACUUM METHODS SHALL BE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR THE SUPERSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ITEM(S) (OR THE UNIT PRICE OF THE NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS - CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS. THE COST OF PAINT REMOVAL SUPERSTRUCTURE REMOVAL SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF §202-3.01 GENERAL AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, ENGINEER THIRTY (30) DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING THE DEMOLITION. PLAN, SEALED BY A REGISTERED NEW YORK STATE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE REQUIREMENTS, OF THE NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS - CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS. A REMOVAL SUPERSTRUCTURE REMOVAL SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF §202-3.01 - GENERAL AND SAFETY SUPERSTRUCTURES. EXISTING SUPERSTRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVED UNDER ITEM 202.120001 - REMOVING EXISTING REMOVAL OF SUBSTRUCTURES.. EXISTING SUBSTRUCTURE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN THE PAY LIMITS SHOWN IN THE PLANS UNDER ITEM 202.19 - GENERAL NOTES - 1 GNN-01 56-02-G-206-0 E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:34:49 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W RECONSTRUCTION NOTES: GENERAL NOTES - 2 PROTECT IT DURING CONSTRUCTION OR REMOVE AND REMOUNT IT AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. IF THE STRUCTURE HAS A BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (B.I.N.) PLATE ATTACHED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 1. CASTING NEW PEDESTALS AND INSTALLING THE NEW BEARINGS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TOP OF PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO 7. ITEMS IN THE CONTRACT. SCREENS OR OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID USING THE APPROPRIATE THE COST OF FURNISHING, INSTALLING, MAINTAINING, REMOVING AND DISPOSING OF ALL PLATFORMS, NETS, 6. DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE COUNTY. ALL MATERIAL FALLING ON THE AREA BELOW AND ADJACENT TO THE BRIDGE SHALL BE REMOVED AND 5. ADEQUATE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED. MATERIAL. IF ADEQUATE PROTECTIVE DEVICES ARE NOT BEING EMPLOYED, THE WORK WILL BE STOPPED UNTIL OF MATERIAL. PLATFORMS, NETS, SCREENS OR OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE USED TO CATCH THE MATERIAL TO THE AREA BELOW THE BRIDGE EXCEPT WHERE THE PLANS SPECIFICALLY PERMIT THE DROPPING DURING REMOVAL OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DROP WASTE CONCRETE, DEBRIS, AND OTHER 4. BID FOR THOSE ITEMS. SUPPLYING A DISPOSAL AREA AND TRANSPORTATION TO THAT AREA SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICES WHEN ITEMS IN THE CONTRACT REQUIRE MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF, THE COST OF 3. ENGINEER AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. STATE, THE DAMAGED MATERIALS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IN A MANNER SATISFACTORY TO THE DAMAGES ANY MATERIALS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE OR WHICH ARE TO REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE PLACE, OR WHICH ARE TO REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE STATE, WILL NOT BE DAMAGED. IF THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK WITH CARE SO THAT ANY MATERIALS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN IN 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIELD CONDITIONS. FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND WORK QUANTITIES. THE BEEN PREPARED BASED ON FIELD INSPECTION AND OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME. ACTUAL BE ACCURATELY DETERMINED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS HAVE DUE TO THE NATURE OF RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, THE EXACT EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION WORK CANNOT 1. MISCELLANEOUS NOTE: RIVER/STREAM PROTECTION PLAN TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. SHALL BE MADE UNDER THE VARIOUS ITEMS IN THIS CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A PROTECT AND MAINTAIN WATER RIGHTS AND TO SUSTAIN FISH LIFE DOWNSTREAM. PAYMENT FOR ALL THIS WORK USES WATER FROM A STREAM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT AN INTAKE OR TEMPORARY DAM TO STREAM TO BECOME POLLUTED WITH SAND, SILT, CEMENT, OIL, OR OTHER IMPURITIES. IF THE CONTRACTOR WATER WHICH HAS BEEN USED FOR WASH PURPOSES OR OTHER SIMILAR OPERATIONS WHICH CAUSE THE EQUIPMENT IN OR NEAR SUCH STREAMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RETURN DIRECTLY TO A STREAM ANY SEDIMENT, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OR OTHER FOREIGN MATERIALS, OR FROM THE OPERATION OF AS TO PREVENT OR REDUCE TO A MINIMUM ANY DAMAGE TO ANY STREAM FROM POLLUTION BY DEBRIS, DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT OPERATIONS IN SUCH A MANNER 1. STREAM PROTECTION NOTE GNN-02 B.I.N. PLATE NOTE: 56-02-G-207-0 Alignment Name: Quaker Bridge Road Alignment Description: Alignment Style: Alignment\AC_P Station Northing Easting Element: Linear START ( START ) M 1+00.000 867255.78 665717.18 EQNBK 867255.78 665717.18 EQNAHD M 1+00.000 867255.78 665717.18 PC ( PC ) M 1+26.291 867237.76 665698.04 Tangential Direction: S46.728°W Tangential Length: 26.291 Element: Circular PC ( PC ) M 1+26.291 867237.76 665698.04 HPI ( HPI ) M 1+93.091 867191.97 665649.4 CC ( CC ) 867106.7 665821.42 PCC ( PCC ) M 2+54.220 867125.54 665642.41 Radius: Delta: 40.72 Left Degree of Curvature (Arc): 31.83 Length: 127.929 Tangent: 66.8 Chord: 125.254 Middle Ordinate: 11.246 External: 11.996 Back Tangent Direction: S46.728°W Back Radial Direction: N43.272°W Chord Direction: S26.367°W Ahead Radial Direction: N83.993°W Ahead Tangent Direction: S6.007°W Element: Circular PCC ( PCC ) M 2+54.220 867125.54 665642.41 HPI ( HPI ) M 2+73.745 867106.08 665640.74 CC ( CC ) 867122.16 665681.73 PT ( PT ) M 2+90.483 867092.95 665655.19 Radius: 39.469 Delta: 52.64 Left Degree of Curvature (Arc): 145.17 Length: 36.263 Tangent: 19.525 Chord: 35.001 Middle Ordinate: 4.092 External: 4.565 Back Tangent Direction: S4.906°W Back Radial Direction: N85.094°W Chord Direction: S21.415°E Ahead Radial Direction: S42.263°W Ahead Tangent Direction: S47.737°E Element: Linear PT ( PT ) M 2+90.483 867092.95 665655.19 PC ( PC ) M 3+97.398 867021.06 665734.33 Tangential Direction: S47.750°E Tangential Length: 106.915 Element: Circular PC ( PC ) M 3+97.398 867021.06 665734.33 HPI ( HPI ) M 4+27.922 867000.54 665756.92 CC ( CC ) 866988.44 665704.7 PT ( PT ) M 4+50.791 866972.17 665745.66 Radius: 44.076 Delta: 69.41 Right Degree of Curvature (Arc): 129.99 Length: 53.393 Tangent: 30.524 Chord: 50.188 Middle Ordinate: 7.841 External: 9.537 Back Tangent Direction: S47.750°E Back Radial Direction: S42.250°W Chord Direction: S13.046°E Ahead Radial Direction: N68.343°W Ahead Tangent Direction: S21.657°W Element: Linear PT ( PT ) M 4+50.791 866972.17 665745.66 HPI ( HPI ) M 5+19.475 866908.1 665720.9 Tangential Direction: S21.130°W Tangential Length: 68.684 Element: Linear HPI ( HPI ) M 5+19.475 866908.1 665720.9 END ( END ) M 5+41.583 866887.92 665711.87 Tangential Direction: S24.103°W Tangential Length: 22.109 Alignment Name: Quaker Bridge Road East Alignment Description: Alignment Style: Alignment\AC_P Station Northing Easting Element: Linear START ( START ) S 1+00.000 867061.33 665850.59 EQNBK 1+00.000 867061.33 665850.59 EQNAHD S 1+00.000 867061.33 665850.59 END ( END ) S 2+20.063 867000.46 665747.1 Tangential Direction: S59.540°W Tangential Length: 120.063 CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT BIN# 3348560 M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 03/06/2025 XX 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 5/1/2025 N:\Projects\2024\124-296 Westchester Co - Quaker Bridge Replacement\Working\CADD\dgn connect_2023\124-296_cph_gnn-02.dgn FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 3:32:18 PM DetriKH RECONSTRUCTION NOTES: GENERAL NOTES - 2 PROTECT IT DURING CONSTRUCTION OR REMOVE AND REMOUNT IT AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. IF THE STRUCTURE HAS A BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (B.I.N.) PLATE ATTACHED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CASTING NEW PEDESTALS AND INSTALLING THE NEW BEARINGS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TOP OF PEDESTAL ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO ITEMS IN THE CONTRACT. SCREENS OR OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID USING THE APPROPRIATE THE COST OF FURNISHING, INSTALLING, MAINTAINING, REMOVING AND DISPOSING OF ALL PLATFORMS, NETS, DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE COUNTY. ALL MATERIAL FALLING ON THE AREA BELOW AND ADJACENT TO THE BRIDGE SHALL BE REMOVED AND ADEQUATE PROTECTION IS PROVIDED. MATERIAL. IF ADEQUATE PROTECTIVE DEVICES ARE NOT BEING EMPLOYED, THE WORK WILL BE STOPPED UNTIL OF MATERIAL. PLATFORMS, NETS, SCREENS OR OTHER PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE USED TO CATCH THE MATERIAL TO THE AREA BELOW THE BRIDGE EXCEPT WHERE THE PLANS SPECIFICALLY PERMIT THE DROPPING DURING REMOVAL OPERATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DROP WASTE CONCRETE, DEBRIS, AND OTHER BID FOR THOSE ITEMS. SUPPLYING A DISPOSAL AREA AND TRANSPORTATION TO THAT AREA SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICES WHEN ITEMS IN THE CONTRACT REQUIRE MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF, THE COST OF ENGINEER AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. STATE, THE DAMAGED MATERIALS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IN A MANNER SATISFACTORY TO THE DAMAGES ANY MATERIALS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE OR WHICH ARE TO REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE PLACE, OR WHICH ARE TO REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE STATE, WILL NOT BE DAMAGED. IF THE CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK WITH CARE SO THAT ANY MATERIALS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN IN CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIELD CONDITIONS. FIELD CONDITIONS MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND WORK QUANTITIES. THE BEEN PREPARED BASED ON FIELD INSPECTION AND OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME. ACTUAL BE ACCURATELY DETERMINED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS HAVE DUE TO THE NATURE OF RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, THE EXACT EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION WORK CANNOT MICELLANEOUS NOTE: PROTECT AND MAINTAIN WATER RIGHTS AND TO SUSTAIN FISH LIFE DOWNSTREAM. USES WATER FROM A STREAM, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT AN INTAKE OR TEMPORARY DAM TO STREAM TO BECOME POLLUTED WITH SAND, SILT, CEMENT, OIL, OR OTHER IMPURITIES. IF THE CONTRACTOR WATER WHICH HAS BEEN USED FOR WASH PURPOSES OR OTHER SIMILAR OPERATIONS WHICH CAUSE THE EQUIPMENT IN OR NEAR SUCH STREAMS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RETURN DIRECTLY TO A STREAM ANY SEDIMENT, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OR OTHER FOREIGN MATERIALS, OR FROM THE OPERATION OF AS TO PREVENT OR REDUCE TO A MINIMUM ANY DAMAGE TO ANY STREAM FROM POLLUTION BY DEBRIS, DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT OPERATIONS IN SUCH A MANNER STREAM PROTECTION NOTE GNN-02 E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:10 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W TM 68.18-1-42 LIBER 6502, PAGE 289 VILLAGE OF CROTON ON HUDSON LANDS N/F OF TM 79.06-2-3 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION STATE OF NEW YORK LANDS N/F OF TM 79.06-1-2 VILLAGE OF CROTON ON HUDSON LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-2-1 LIBER 7575, PAGE 439 VILLAGE OF CROTON ON HUDSON LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-3-10 CONTROL NO. 593163545 LINDA HAMILTON LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-3-12 CONTROL NO. 512863213 NICHOLAS KAPLAN MICHAEL A. KAPLAN AND LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-3-11 LIBER 11069, PAGE 103 MICHAEL I. WEINTRAUB CROTON TRUST AS TRUSTEES OF THE ANITA B. WEINTRAUB AND SANFORD WEINTRAUB LANDS N/F OF (FILED MAP 19964) PARCEL D (FILED MAP 19964) PARCEL C WOODS WOODS WOODS STRUCTURE CONCRETE CONCRETE RET. WALL STONE WING WALL EDGE OF WATER STONE WING WALL EDGE OF WATER AREA RIP RAP EDGE OF WATER L L A W G NI W E G DI R B ASPHALT ASPHALT DRAINAGE RIP RAP MAPLE 18" STONE WALL DITCH POST POST STONE RET. WALL WOODS WOODS WOODS BOLLARDS CROTON RIVER RAIL GUIDE WOOD STONE LINED DITCH BRIDGE WING WALL BORING FOUND PIPE IRON ROCK X-CUT IN STONE WALL DITCH BORING BORING BORING BORING BORING GNP-01 HIGHWAY GENERAL PLAN 80' 1" = 40' TRAVEL LANE 11'-0" TRAVEL LANE 11'-0" 5'-0" SHOULDER 1'-0" SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE 9'-0" TRAVEL LANE 9'-0" 1'-0" SHOULDER 1'-0" SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE 9'-0" TRAVEL LANE 9'-0" 1'-0" SHOULDER 1'-0" SHOULDER 56-02-R-212-0 CUTTING PAVEMENT ITEM 627.50140008 ACQUIRED BY COUNTY LIMITS OF TO BE THE PROJECT ACCESS AT COMPLETION OF REESTABLISH WALKING TRAIL EASEMENT LIMITS OF PERMANENT CUTTING PAVEMENT ITEM 627.50140008 CUTTING PAVEMENT ITEM 627.50140008 FOLLOWING LOCATIONS. FINAL ROAD STRIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE 1. NOTE: START STA. END STA. ITEM NO. DESCIPTION M 2+25.00 M 2+25.00 M 1+26.29 M 4+00.00 M 4+00.00 M 4+00.00 685.1102 685.1102 685.1202 SINGLE WHITE LT. SHLDR. SINGLE WHITE RT. SHLDR. ¡ DOUBLE YELLOW M 1+26.29 PC M 2+54.22 PCC M 2+90.48 PT M 3+97.40 PC M 4+50.79 PT M 1+00.00 P.I. STA M 1+00 M 2+00 M 3+00 M 4+00 M 5+00 S 1+00 S 2+00 (BK) 1+00.00 STA (AH) = S 1+00.00 STA S 1+00 S 2+00 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END RECONSTRUCTION M 2+90.48 PT M 3+97.40 PC END RECONSTRUCTION STA. M 5+40.01 #13 KV P.P. W 57 13 KV P.P. HEAD WALL CONC. W 5 P.P. 8" CMP INV.=35.96 15" CMP SE.INV.=36.82 N.INV.=38.47 T.F.=39.57 C.B. =46.62 INV. =49.95 INV. 61.51 INV.= 12" CMP =43.13 INV. =43.20 INV. 12" PVC 15" CMP 18" CMP =41.7 INV. E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:12 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W SHOULDER 2'-3" SHOULDER 5'-0" BREAK 2.0% T.G.L. 6.0% 6.0% TRAVEL LANE 11'-0" TRAVEL LANE 11'-0" QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD , STA. LINE, & H.C.L. ¡ PROPOSED ITEM 606.2702 BEAM GUIDE RAILING HPBO (MOD.) CORRUGATED GROUND ORIGINAL TYPICAL HIGHWAY SECTION SHOULDER 2'-3" TRAVEL LANE 11'-0" 6.0% 2.0% T.G.L. 6.0% ITEMS 610.1402 & 610.1601 TURF (ROADSIDE), 4" TOPSOIL & ESTABLISH GROUND ORIGINAL TO REMAIN RETAINING WALL EXISTING CONCRETE ITEM 304.12 COURSE TYPE II, 12" - SUBBASE TYPICAL HIGHWAY SECTION TRAVEL LANE 11'-0" QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD , STA. LINE, & H.C.L. ¡ PROPOSED ITEM 606.2702 BEAM GUIDE RAILING HPBO (MOD.) CORRUGATED RETAINING WALL STA. M 1+26.29 TO STA. M 1+80.00 STA. M 1+80.00 TO STA. M 2+67.25 T.G.L. 80 SERIES COMPACTION " - 9.5 F3 TOP COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION " - 19 F9 BINDER COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION 5" - 37.5 F9 BASE COURSE, VARIES SHOULDER 2'-3" SHOULDER 2'-3" ITEM 606.2702 BEAM GUIDE RAILING HPBO (MOD.) CORRUGATED TRAVEL LANE VARIES TRAVEL LANE VARIES TYPICAL HIGHWAY SECTION STA. M 4+27.17 TO STA. M 5+40.01 2.0% VARIES GROUND ORIGINAL 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.0983 " - 9.5 F3 TOP COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.1989 " - 19 F9 BINDER COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.3789 5" - 37.5 F9 BASE COURSE, 2.0% ITEM 304.12 COURSE TYPE II, 12" - SUBBASE SHOULDER 1'-0" VARIES SHOULDER BREAK QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD , STA. LINE, & H.C.L. ¡ PROPOSED BREAK BREAK TYP-01 HIGHWAY TYPICAL SECTIONS 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.0983 " - 9.5 F3 TOP COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.1989 " - 19 F9 BINDER COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.3789 5" - 37.5 F9 BASE COURSE, ITEM 304.12 COURSE TYPE II, 12" - SUBBASE ITEMS 610.1402 & 610.1601 TURF (ROADSIDE), 4" TOPSOIL & ESTABLISH ITEMS 610.1402 & 610.1601 TURF (ROADSIDE), 4" TOPSOIL & ESTABLISH T.G.L. ITEM 304.12 COURSE TYPE II, 12" - SUBBASE 2.0% SHOULDER 2'-3" 6.0% VARIES BREAK SHOULDER 1'-0" ITEM 606.2702 BEAM GUIDE RAILING HPBO (MOD.) CORRUGATED ITEMS 610.1402 & 610.1601 TURF (ROADSIDE), 4" TOPSOIL & ESTABLISH QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD EAST , STA. LINE, & H.C.L. ¡ PROPOSED 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.0983 " - 9.5 F3 TOP COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.1989 " - 19 F9 BINDER COURSE, 80 SERIES COMPACTION, ITEM 404.3789 5" - 37.5 F9 BASE COURSE, TYPICAL HIGHWAY SECTION STA. S 1+00.00 TO STA. S 2+05.74 TRAVEL LANE 9'-0" 2.0% SHOULDER 2'-3" 6.0% BREAK TRAVEL LANE 9'-0" SHOULDER 1'-0" 1'-0" VARIES 8' 3/16" = 1' ROUND 4' V.C. ROUND 4' V.C. 56-02-R-213-0 ITEM 407.0102 DILUTED TACK COAT, ITEM 407.0102 DILUTED TACK COAT, ITEM 407.0102 DILUTED TACK COAT, ITEM 407.0102 DILUTED TACK COAT, EXCAVATION AND DISPOSAL. SUBBASE TO BE PAID UNDER ITEM 203.02 - UNCLASSIFIED REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BOTTOM OF PROPOSED 1. NOTE: 42.07 40.43 28.42 46.07 55.79 42.07 40.43 28.42 46.07 55.79 E E X C R S L IO ROAD-2 M 1+00 M 1+00 M 2+00 M 3+00 M 4+00 M 5+00 41.53 41.05 40.97 42.40 43.90 45.40 46.90 50.68 56.27 41.53 41.03 40.43 41.30 18.67 51.23 STA. M 3+95.00 EXP. BRGS. ¡ STA. M 2+95.00 FIX BRGS. ¡ 41.53 41.05 40.97 42.40 43.90 45.40 46.90 50.68 56.27 41.53 41.03 40.43 41.30 18.67 51.23 STA. S 2+20.06 STA. M 4+21.95 EQUALITY STATION 25'-0" APPROACH SLAB 100'-0" ¡ BRG. TO ¡ BRG. 25'-0" APPROACH SLAB BEGINS STA. M 4+27.17 PPROACH PAVMENT A ENDS STA. M 2+67.25 PPROACH PAVMENT A CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:14 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W PROFILE - QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD 80' HORIZONTAL SCALE 4' VERTICAL SCALE PRO-01 QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD 56-02-R-214-0 40.75 EL M 1+77.04 - VLP -2.00% +3.00% +11.17% 40.99 EL M 1+53.06 - VPC 41.29 EL M 2+13.06 - VPT 46.90 EL M 4+00.11 - VPC 50.70 EL M 4+50.11 - VPT PROPOSED GRADE ORGINAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING GRADE FT. HSD = FT. 0.38 E = +3.00% G2 = -2.00% G1 = FT. 60.00 L = SAG CURVE: FT. HSD = FT. 0.57 E = G2 = +11.17% +3.00% G1 = FT. 50.00 L = SAG CURVE: 40.75 EL M 1+77.04 - VLP -2.00% +3.00% +11.17% 40.99 EL M 1+53.06 - VPC 41.29 EL M 2+13.06 - VPT 46.90 EL M 4+00.11 - VPC 50.70 EL M 4+50.11 - VPT 41.53 EL BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION M 1+26.00 - VPI 60.74 EL END RECONSTRUCTION M 5+40.01 - VPI 40.39 EL M 1+83.06 - VPI 47.65 EL M 4+25.11 - VPI 58.15 49.61 58.15 49.61 58.15 49.61 58.15 49.61 E E X C R S L IO S 1+00 S 1+00 S 2+00 58.15 53.33 49.51 0.00 58.15 53.33 49.51 0.00 STA. S 2+20.06 STA. M 4+21.95 EQUALITY STATION 58.15 52.50 48.70 58.15 53.48 49.61 58.15 52.50 48.70 58.15 53.48 49.61 CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:16 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W 80' HORIZONTAL SCALE 4' VERTICAL SCALE PROFILE - QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD EAST PRO-02 QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD EAST 56-02-R-215-0 ORIGINAL GROUND PROPOSED GRADE FT. HSD = FT. 0.87 E = -2.35% G2 = -11.37% G1 = FT. 77.48 L = SAG CURVE: -11.37% 53.31 EL S 1+42.58 - VPC 47.99 EL S 2+20.06 - VPT 48.91 EL S 1+81.32 - VPI E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:22 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W TM 68.18-1-42 LIBER 6502, PAGE 289 VILLAGE OF CROTON ON HUDSON LANDS N/F OF TM 79.06-2-3 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION STATE OF NEW YORK LANDS N/F OF TM 79.06-1-2 VILLAGE OF CROTON ON HUDSON LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-2-1 LIBER 7575, PAGE 439 VILLAGE OF CROTON ON HUDSON LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-3-10 CONTROL NO. 593163545 LINDA HAMILTON LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-3-12 CONTROL NO. 512863213 NICHOLAS KAPLAN MICHAEL A. KAPLAN AND LANDS N/F OF TM 68.18-3-11 LIBER 11069, PAGE 103 MICHAEL I. WEINTRAUB CROTON TRUST AS TRUSTEES OF THE ANITA B. WEINTRAUB AND SANFORD WEINTRAUB LANDS N/F OF (FILED MAP 19964) PARCEL D (FILED MAP 19964) PARCEL C WOODS WOODS WOODS CONCRETE RET. WAL CONCRETE RET. WALL EDGE OF WATER EDGE OF WATER AREA RIP RAP EDGE OF WATER ASPHALT ASPHALT DRAINAGE RIP RAP MAPLE 18" STONE WALL STONE RET. WALL WOODS WOODS WOODS CROTON RIVER PILLAR STONE IRON GATE WROUGHT RAIL GUIDE WOOD FOUND PIPE IRON ROD FOUND CAPPED IRON ROCK X-CUT IN STONE WALL M 1+26.29 PC M 2+54.22 PCC M 2+90.48 PT M 3+97.40 PC M 4+50.79 PT M 1+00.00 P.I. STA M 1+00 M 2+00 M 3+00 M 4+00 M 5+00 S 1+00 S 2+00 (BK) 1+00.00 STA (AH) = S 1+00.00 STA S 1+00 S 2+00 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END RECONSTRUCTION ROAD QUAKER BRIDGE TO ALBANY POST ROAD RIDGE ROAD TO QUAKER ROAD EAST QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD QUAKER BRIDGE GRID NORTH , STA. LINE, AND H.C.L. ¡ QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD EAST , STA. LINE, AND H.C.L. ¡ QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD FLOW CROTON RIVER GRADING PLAN TO RTE 129 GRD-01 80' 1" = 40' OHW EL. 28.25 OHW EL. 28.25 56-02-R-216-0 #13 KV P.P. W 57 13 KV P.P. HEAD WALL CONC. W 5 P.P. W/LIGHT P.P. P.P. #13 KV P.P. W 57 13 KV P.P. W 5 P.P. W/LIGHT P.P. P.P. E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:25 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W WOODS WOODS WOODS CONCRETE RET. WAL CONCRETE RET. WALL STONE WING WALL EDGE OF WATER STONE WING WALL EDGE OF WATER EDGE OF WATER STONE WALL POST POST STONE RET. WALL WOODS WOODS WOODS KEY PAD BOLLARDS CROTON RIVER PILLAR STONE IRON GATE WROUGHT RAIL GUIDE WOOD BRIDGE WING WALL STONE WALL ROAD QUAKER BRIDGE TO ALBANY POST ROAD RIDGE ROAD TO QUAKER ROAD EAST QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD QUAKER BRIDGE GRID NORTH , STA. LINE, AND H.C.L. ¡ QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD EAST , STA. LINE, AND H.C.L. ¡ QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD FLOW CROTON RIVER TO RTE 129 LAP-01 80' 1" = 40' (136) LIVE STAKES 36" Ø (47) LIVE STAKES 36" Ø NUMBER NYDOT ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT LANDSCAPING: 611.0114 PLANTING - MAJOR DECIDUOUS TREES – 6' HEIGHT, 2-3" CALIPER EA 611.19 POST-PLANTING CARE EA 616.08000024 LIVE STAKE PLANTINGS 1" TO 2" EA 610.1401 TOPSOIL - REUSE ON-SITE MATERIALS CY 610.1101 MULCH FOR PLANTING TYPE A,B & D WOOD CHIPS & SHREDDED BARK CY 610.19 WATERING VEGETATION 0.225 1000 GAL LAP-01 LANDSCAPE PLAN (117) LIVE STAKES 36" Ø 56-02-R-217-0 PLANTING LIST SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONTAINER REMARKS TREES AS ACER SACCHARUM/SUGAR MAPLE 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED BL BETULA LENTA/SWEET BIRCH 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED FA FRAXINUS AMERICANA/WHITE ASH 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED LT LIRIODENDRON TULIPFERA/TULIP POPLAR 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED PO PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS/AMERICAN SYCAMORE 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED QR QUERCUS RUBRA/NORTHERN RED OAK 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED TC TSUGA CANADENSIS/EASTERN HEMLOCK 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED UA ULMUS AMERICANA/AMERICAN ELM 2" CAL. MIN. 6-8' MINIMUM HEIGHT ONCE PLANTED SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONTAINER SPACING REMARKS SHRUB AREAS SN SALIX NIGRA/LIVE STAKES 1" MIN. CAL. LIVE STAKE 36" O.C. APPLICATION 1-2" DIAMETER, 2-6' LONG DEPENDING ON SITE M 1+26.29 PC M 2+54.22 PCC M 2+90.48 PT M 3+97.40 PC M 4+50.79 PT M 1+00.00 P.I. STA M 1+00 M 2+00 M 3+00 M 4+00 M 5+00 S 1+00 S 2+00 (BK) 1+00.00 STA (AH) = S 1+00.00 STA S 1+00 S 2+00 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END RECONSTRUCTION #13 KV P.P. W 57 13 KV P.P. W 5 P.P. SE.INV.=36.82 N.INV.=38.47 T.F.=39.57 C.B. W/LIGHT P.P. P.P. E E X C R S L IO 3B 3A CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:33 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W LANDSCAPING DETAILS LAD-01 FOR TREE PLANTING. SEE SHEET LAP-01 FOR PAY ITEMS 2. SEASON. ETC. AFTER ONE GROWING REMOVE GUYING, TREE WRAP, 1. PLAN VIEW OF STAKING FLUORESECNT FLAGGING ON WIRE. 3. CUT LEADERS. BRANCHES. DO NOT PROVIDE MINIMAL PRUNING. ONLY TO CORRECT DAMAGED 2. SLOPE. THIS DETAIL SHALL APPLY TO ALL TREES PLANTED ON A 1. TREE HEIGHT APPROX 2 / 3 STAKE W/ CENTERED 1" x 2" x 18" WOOD " SISAL ROPE 5" ABOVE FINAL GRADE NATURAL ROOT COLLAR 3" - TRUNK) NOT TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TREE HARDWOOD MULCH MIN. (MULCH 3" LAYER OF SHREDDED AREA ABOVE ROOT BALL PROVIDE 6" RADIUS UNMULCHED 4" HIGH WATER BERM COMPACT FILL TO BE BENCHED IN PLANTING PIT FINISHED GRADE 1/2 OF WIRE BASKET ( FROM ROOT BALL AND PIT.) SYNTHETIC MATERIAL. CUT AND REMOVE UPPER CUT AND REMOVE UPPER 1/3 OF BURLAP. NO MIXTURE AS SPECIFIED BACKFILL PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL SET BALL ON PLAN VIEW OF STAKING TREE PIT 2X ROOTBALL DIA. MIN. 6" DEPTH INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL LODGE POLES EXTEND 2' UNDISTURBED SOIL PLANTING MIX AS SPEC'D AROUND TOPE 1/3 OF BALL BURLAP AND WIRE BASKETS LOOSEN AND FOLD BACK 3" SAUCER AROUND TREE 3" SHREDDED BARK MULCH 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE SET TOP OF ROOT BALL HOSE OVER #12 GALV. WIRE 1/ 2" FABRIC BEARING RUBBER #12 GALV. WIRE ALTERNATE STAKING 2" x 2" STAKES, 2 GUYS PER TREE 2 1 /2" OR LARGER (10' OR LARGER) PRUNE 1 / 4 TO 1 / 3 BRANCHES NOTES: TREE PIT 2X ROOTBALL DIA. SLOPE TREE PLANTING DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) TREE PLANTING DETAIL (NOT TO SCALE) (NOT TO SCALE) SLOPE INSTALLATION GUIDELINES: 12" INTERVALS. THE END OF BLANKET MUST BE SECURED IN A 6"x6" TRENCH WITH A ROW OF STAPLES PLACED AT 7. PLACED 4" BELOW IN A STAGGERED PATTERN. THEN CONTINUE WITH GENERAL INSTALLATION. ROW OF STAPLES 4" APART ALONG ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE SLOPE. A SECOND ROW SHOULD BE FOR MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE A CHECK SLOT SHOULD BE PLACED AT 25'-40' INTERVALS. PLACE A 6. APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF BLANKETS. STYLE IN THE DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW. CONNECT THE BLANKETS BY PLACING STAPLES ADDITIONAL VERTICAL BLANKETS CAN BE JOINED USING A MINIMUM 4" OVERLAPPING OF SHINGLE 5. STAPLES PLACED APPROXIMATELY 3'-0" APART. PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE OVERLAPPED BY A MINIMUM OF 4", AND SECURED WITH A ROW OF 4. PATTERN BELOW, SPECIFIED BY SLOPE. ROLL THE BLANKET VERTICALLY DOWN THE SLOPE. SECURE USING THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE 3. WITH A ROW OF STAPLES PLACED 12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH. APPLY SEED, AND FOLD THE BLANKET OVER SOIL, SECURE SECURE THE BLANKET AT THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH WITH STAPLES PLACED 12" APART. BEGIN BY PLACING THE BLANKET A MINIMUM OF 12" DOWN-SLOPE OF THE UP-SLOPE TRENCH. 2. APPLIED. PREPARE THE SLOPE SOIL SURFACE (RAKING, SEEDING AND FERTILIZING). DIG A 6" BY 6" TRENCH BOTH UP-SLOPE AND DOWN-SLOPE OF THE AREA THE MATTING IS TO BE 1. PRODUCT AND ALL ASSOCIATED LABOR AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PAID FOR UNDER ITEM 209.1801. BE CONFIRMED WITH YOUR LOCAL DISTRIBUTOR. PAYMENT FOR ROLLED EROSION CONTROL THESE GUIDELINES ARE RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY, ANY QUESTIONS WITH THE INSTALLATION SHOULD SLOPE APPLICATION 6" 6" 12" 2"-5" 3" ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT DETAIL NOTES: 56-02-R-218-0 E E X C R S L IO CONSULTANT SEAL INFORMATION CONSULTANT M. HUNT K. SCHUMAN-EKES K. DETRICK BIN# 3348560 WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AS SHOWN 06/24/2025 25-500 PROJECT COORDINATOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE TITLE NAME DATE AS BUILT - NO CHANGES AS BUILT - CHANGES AS NOTED RECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATION REVISION NUMBER DATE MADE BY APP'D BY REVISION CHECKED BY IN CHARGE OF MADE BY SHEET NO. OF NUMBER SHEET NUMBER CONTRACT SCALE: DATE: DPW FILE NO. REV. NO. TOWN OF CORTLANDT, NEW YORK OVER CROTON RIVER (BIN 3348560) REPLACEMENT OF QUAKER BRIDGE ROAD BRIDGE 6/25/2025 $FILE$ FILE NAME = USER = DATE/TIME = PLOT = NY_PDF.pltcfg 9:35:34 AM morrimm N OI S S E F O . K R O Y W N E F O E T A T S M A T T H E J H U N T R E E N I G N E L A R P D E S N E C I L W LANDSCAPING NOTES LAN-01 10 SHRUBS (3 GALLONS) WILL BE CONSIDERED THE EQUIVALENT OF A TREE d. 3 LOW MATURING TREES WILL BE CONSIDERED THE EQUIVALENT OF A TREE c. 6-8 FT ONCE PLANTED b. 2-3” DBH a. REPLANTED TREES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: REMOVED ON SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25% SHALL BE MITIGATED AT A RATIO OF 2:1. ANY TREE REMOVED FOR TEMPORARY STAGING AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE MITIGATED AT A RATIO OF 1:1. TREES 1. AT THE 1:1 RATIO, 35 OF THE 35 REMOVED TREES HAVE BEEN SITED FOR REPLACEMENT ON SITE. TREES REPLACED ON VILLAGE OF CROTON-ON-HUDSON SIDE SCHEDULE (LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CLIENT) THE REMAINING 21 TREES WILL NEED TO BE PLANTED OFF-SITE. RECOMMENDED SPECIES TO BE SELECTED FROM PLANT AT THE 2:1 RATIO, 12 TREES WERE REMOVED, 3TREES HAVE BEEN SITED FOR REPLACEMENT ON SITE. REPLACED ON CORTLANDT SIDE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES TO BE PLANTREES TREE PLACEMENT TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 6. THE SITE LEFT IN A NEAT AND ACCEPTABLE CONDITION AS APPROVED BY THE [...truncated...]