Nextel Memo to VB 10 05 11 final
resolution
1 page
Meeting: portal event 708 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution- Nextel
Resolution, 1 page. Attached to agenda item: “PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution- Nextel”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
20110808 VB c8 nextelsprenewal
Coastal assessment form
EAF
Nextel Memo to VB 9 23 11.docx
Nextel Special Permit renewal PB to VB rev1
VB resolution for renewal of Nextel SP 2011 FINAL 1
memo Engineer to Manager on Nextel Special permit renewal
resolution-NEXTEL SPECIAL PERMIT
resolution-NEXTEL SPECIAL PERMIt - public hearing
resolution-NEXTEL SPECIAL PERMIt - seqra
Extracted text
CHARLIE KAE
Members
A GALLELLI
STUART GREEBAUM
BRUCE KAUDERER
IA MURTAUGH
Attorney
JAMES STAUDT
Village Engineer
DAIEL O’COOR, P.E.
ROIE ROSE
MEMORADUM
TO:
Mayor Leo Wiegman and Board of Trustees
FROM:
Charlie Kane, Chairman of Waterfront Advisory Committee
SUBJECT:
Nextel of New York, Inc. – 1 Van Wyck Street (Sec. 78.08 Blk. 5 Lot 9) – Referral
from Village Board regarding a special permit application for renewal of a
Personal Wireless Services Facility located at 1 Van Wyck Street—final
consistency review
DATE:
October 6, 2011
On October 5, 2011, the Waterfront Advisory Committee (WAC) reviewed the above-referenced
referral for consistency with the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP).
Based on their review of the Short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) dated September 1,
2011, the Coastal Assessment Form (CAF) dated September 1, 2011, and the fact that there
have been no changes to the application since the preliminary review, the WAC made a final
determination of consistency with the LWRP by a vote of 3-0 in favor. Chairman Charlie Kane,
Ann Gallelli, Bruce Kauderer were present at the meeting.
The WAC evaluated this application for consistency in accordance with the LWRP policy
standards and conditions set forth in section 225-6(J) of the Village Code, which are further
explained and described in Section III of the LWRP. The WAC members noted that this
application is a renewal and there have been no changes to this application. Because there are no
expected adverse impacts on coastal resources, there is no reason to consider alternative actions
or mitigation measures.
It is for the reasons contained in this memorandum that the WAC issues its final recommendation
of consistency.
CK:rr
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.