General Splice to VB 10 05 11 final
resolution
1 page
Meeting: portal event 712 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-General Splice
Resolution, 1 page. Attached to agenda item: “PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-General Splice”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
General Splice CAF 2011
General Splice EAF 2011
General Splice memo to VB from PB
General Splice special permit 2011 1
General Splice to VB 9 22 11.docx 2
resolution-general splice
resolution-general splice -SEQRA
resolution-general splice -special permit
resolution-general splice public hearing 1
Extracted text
CHARLIE KAE
Members
A GALLELLI
STUART GREEBAUM
BRUCE KAUDERER
IA MURTAUGH
Attorney
JAMES STAUDT
Village Engineer
DAIEL O’COOR, P.E.
ROIE ROSE
MEMORADUM
TO:
Mayor Leo Wiegman and Board of Trustees
FROM:
Charlie Kane, Chairman of Waterfront Advisory Committee
SUBJECT:
General Splice Corporation – 1 Niles Road (Sec. 68.14 Blk. 5 Lots 4, 5) –
Referral from Village Board regarding a special use permit for non-conforming
use—final consistency review
DATE:
October 6, 2011
On October 5, 2011, the Waterfront Advisory Committee reviewed the above-referenced referral
for a final determination of consistency with the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization
Program (LWRP). Based on the preliminary determination of consistency with the LWRP made
by the WAC on September 22, 2011, the Short EAF dated September 1, 2011, the Coastal
Assessment Form (CAF) dated September 1, 2011, and the fact that there have been no changes
made to the application since the preliminary review, a final determination of consistency was
made by a vote of 3-0 in favor. Chairman Charlie Kane, Ann Gallelli, and Bruce Kauderer were
present.
The WAC evaluated this application for consistency in accordance with the LWRP policy
standards and conditions set forth in section 225-6(J) of the Village Code, which are further
explained and described in Section III of the LWRP. The WAC members noted that there have
been no changes made to this application since the preliminary review. Because there are no
expected adverse impacts on coastal resources, there is no reason to consider alternative actions
or mitigation measures.
It is for the reasons contained in this memorandum that the WAC issues its final recommendation
of consistency.
CK/rlr
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.