croton.news
Croton’s #1 source for AI-generated hyperlocal news
Croton-on-Hudson, New York · Sunday, August 16, 2026· Aug 16, 2026
Source-linkedCorrections welcomed
Documents

General Splice to VB 10 05 11 final

resolution 1 page
Meeting: portal event 712 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-General Splice
Resolution, 1 page. Attached to agenda item: “PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-General Splice”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal. View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item: General Splice CAF 2011 General Splice EAF 2011 General Splice memo to VB from PB General Splice special permit 2011 1 General Splice to VB 9 22 11.docx 2 resolution-general splice resolution-general splice -SEQRA resolution-general splice -special permit resolution-general splice public hearing 1
CHARLIE KAE Members A GALLELLI STUART GREEBAUM BRUCE KAUDERER IA MURTAUGH Attorney JAMES STAUDT Village Engineer DAIEL O’COOR, P.E. ROIE ROSE MEMORADUM TO: Mayor Leo Wiegman and Board of Trustees FROM: Charlie Kane, Chairman of Waterfront Advisory Committee SUBJECT: General Splice Corporation – 1 Niles Road (Sec. 68.14 Blk. 5 Lots 4, 5) – Referral from Village Board regarding a special use permit for non-conforming use—final consistency review DATE: October 6, 2011 On October 5, 2011, the Waterfront Advisory Committee reviewed the above-referenced referral for a final determination of consistency with the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). Based on the preliminary determination of consistency with the LWRP made by the WAC on September 22, 2011, the Short EAF dated September 1, 2011, the Coastal Assessment Form (CAF) dated September 1, 2011, and the fact that there have been no changes made to the application since the preliminary review, a final determination of consistency was made by a vote of 3-0 in favor. Chairman Charlie Kane, Ann Gallelli, and Bruce Kauderer were present. The WAC evaluated this application for consistency in accordance with the LWRP policy standards and conditions set forth in section 225-6(J) of the Village Code, which are further explained and described in Section III of the LWRP. The WAC members noted that there have been no changes made to this application since the preliminary review. Because there are no expected adverse impacts on coastal resources, there is no reason to consider alternative actions or mitigation measures. It is for the reasons contained in this memorandum that the WAC issues its final recommendation of consistency. CK/rlr

Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.

Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.