44 Park Trail Application
application
7 pages
From the meeting:
Zoning Board of Appeals — 2022-07-13
Agenda item: NEW BUSINESS — Julie Evans, Architect, AIA, representing Michelle Franks & John Neill, Owners--44 Park Trail---Located in the RA-25 District and designated on the Tax Maps of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson as Section 68.13-3-14. Request for a rear yard variance from Village Code Section 230-33A for a proposed 1-room addition on an existing residence.
Application, 7 pages. Attached to agenda item: “NEW BUSINESS — Julie Evans, Architect, AIA, representing Michelle Franks & John Neill, Owners--44 Park Trail---Located in the RA-25 District and designated on the Tax Maps of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson as Section 68”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
44 Park Trail - ZBA Plans Complete Set- 6.22.22 . 5 pg
Extracted text
100 Benedict Boulevard, Croton-on-Hudson, NY 10520
914.980.5345 | fax 914.271.5925 | julie@evansarchitecture.com | www.evansarchitecture.com
APPEAL FOR VARIANCE FROM REAR LOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS
44 PARK TRAIL (SEC. 68.13, BLOCK 3, LOT 14)
Date: June 22, 2022
To: Zoning Board of Appeals, Village of Croton-on-Hudson
From: Michelle Franks & John Neill
Michelle Franks and John Neill (Section 68.13, Block 3, Lot 14), request a variance for rear yard
setback yard requirements of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson Zoning Law. It is the applicants’
intention to construct a single story “pocket home office” over a rarely used portion of their
existing deck. The office will project 1’-6” beyond the existing deck to 8’-0” to be furnishable
and functional. The rear corners of the existing home as well as corners of the existing decks are
existing non-conforming: projecting beyond the 30’ required rear yard setback for the R-25 zone.
ZBA considerations:
1. Negative Impacts to neighborhood-character-neighboring properties? The proposed
addition will have, at most, a minimal impact on the neighboring dwellings. As the
photographs show, the rear portion of the subject home and deck area are not visible from
the street. The rear of the home is heavily screened by existing trees, and hardly visible
from its neighbor to the south at 42 Park Trail. It faces the driveway but not the active
portions of 42 Park Trail, such as decks or patios.
2. Reasonable Methods to Extend the Dwelling? The applicants do not have another
reasonable method for achieving additional space in the dwelling without an addition and
an area variance. There is no other practical way to add on to the home without disrupting
the recently renovated porch, living, dining, and kitchen spaces and their windows and
rooflines to the front, and the area over the large side deck is too close to the existing
septic field, and would also disrupt the living room and its windows.
3. Substantial Area Variance? The corner of the new room will be 22.06’ from the rear
property line, requiring a variance of 7.94’ from the 30’ rear yard requirement. In
context, the existing deck corner is 20.77 from the rear line, other portions of the deck are
19.12’ from the rear line, and the corner of the house is 25.3’ from the rear line. Building
a single-story room over the deck extends the non-conformity by a modest amount, in
this context. Thus, this is not a Substantial variance.
4. Adverse environmental effects to district? The addition will have no adverse
environmental effects. The footprint of the addition will cover the existing deck, and will
be built on piers, rather than a full foundation. NO trees will be removed. The new
construction will add 25 s.f. of building coverage beyond the deck. Thus, there will be
minimal site disturbance to the immediate property, no negative impacts to the district.
5. Self created difficulty? Yes, in that the homeowners desire a home office.
Conclusion
The proposed addition, which would increase the area of the dwelling by 144 sq. ft., will not
have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the
neighborhood. We appreciate the consideration of this appeal by the Zoning Board of Appeals
and will be glad to provide any explanation or additional material requested by the Zoning Board
of Appeal on this application.
PROXY STATEMENT
Michelle Franks and John Neill are the owners of a residential property located at
44 Park Trail, Croton on Hudson, NY, and has authorized
Julie D. Evans, AIA, to make applications for and represent them at all Zoning Board of
Appeals meetings pertaining to the addition-alteration of a deck into a finished room at the
above address.
_____________________________________________ ___June 21, 2022__
Signature of Owner
Date
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.