FINAL memo to Village manager on assessment comparisons
memo
6 pages
Meeting: portal event 792 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: Discussion on the Village's Assessing Unit Status.
Memo, 6 pages. Attached to agenda item: “Discussion on the Village's Assessing Unit Status.”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
Assessor Memo
village assessment options
Extracted text
ENGINEERS OFFICE
Stanley H. Kellerhouse Municipal Building
One Van Wyck Street, 2nd floor
Croton-on-Hudson, NY 10520-2501
Mayor
Leo A.W. Wiegman
Trustees
Ann H. Gallelli
Ian W. Murtaugh
Gregory Schmidt
Casey Raskob
Village Manager
Abraham Zambrano
Assistant Village Manager
Janine King
Village Treasurer
Sandra Bullock
Village Engineer/Building Inspector
Daniel O’Connor, P.E.
Asst. Building Inspector/Assessor
Joseph Sperber
Fire Inspector
Peter Anfiteatro
MEMORANDUM
Date:
October 17, 2011
To:
Abe Zambrano
From:
Joseph Sperber, Village Assessor/Assistant Building Inspector
Daniel O’Connor, P.E., Village Engineer/Building Inspector
Subject:
Comparison of Croton and Cortlandt Assessment Roll – Preliminary Report
As requested by the Village Board a comparison of assessments for the Village of Croton-on-
Hudson and the Town of Cortlandt was conducted, below are the results of the comparison.
The assessment information was obtained from the RPS database in Croton and the PAS
database in Cortlandt.
• The base year for the Village Assessments is 1967 and 1949-1952 for the Town of
Cortlandt assessments. These base years result in a very low equalization rate being
established for both municipalities.
• There are approximately 3285 individual assessments in the Village. Of these 3285
individual assessments there are 3112 non-exempt parcels and 8 special franchises in
the Village. There are 3281 individual assessments in the Town of Cortlandt. Of these
3281 individual assessments there are approximately 3112 non-exempt parcels and 18
special franchises in the Town.
• There is not an exact match in the assessment count between the Village and the Town.
Some of the differences relate to consolidation of multiple tax parcels under one
ownership into a single tax parcel and associated assessment. For example in the
Village the special franchises are consolidated into eight assessments; one for each
separate company; the Town has 18 individual special franchise assessments, multiple
assessments for some individual companies. This difference in number of individual
assessments was taken into consideration in the analysis below, for example two or
more individual assessments may have been combined to compare it to a single Town
assessment and vice versa.
• A comparison of the total assessed valuation between the Village and the Town is
shown in the table below. The table also includes a calculation of the total assessed
Subject:
Comparison of Croton and Cortlandt Assessment Rolls
Tel: 914-271-4783
www.crotononhudson-ny.gov
Fax: 914-271-3790
market value of all parcels using the current respective equalization rates for each
municipality.
• It should be noted that the Village assessment roll used in this analysis was finalized on
April 1st, 2011 and the Town’s assessment roll used in this analysis was finalized on
September 15th, 2010. This approximate half year time difference in the assessment
rolls introduces some error in the comparison since the Village’s assessment roll
includes changes to properties and their corresponding assessment changes for an
approximate six month time frame after the establishment of the Town’s assessment
roll.
• The Equalization Rates used are: 3.71% (0.0371) for Croton-on-Hudson and 1.87%
(0.0187) for Cortlandt.
Municipality Total Assessed
Valuation
Equalization Rate
(2011)
Total Market
Value
Croton
$44,574,962.00
3.71%
$1,200,557,843.67
Cortlandt
$21,048,362.00
1.87%
$1,125,580,855.61
• The Town’s total calculated market value of all assessed properties is approximately
94% of the Village total calculated market value of all assessed properties. This 6%
difference is acceptable given all the factors involved.
• One immediate change that would need to occur if the Village assumed the Town of
Cortlandt’s assessment roll would be a dramatic increase in the mill rate. Since the
Town’s total assessed valuation is approximately 47% of the Village’s total assessment
the Village’s mill rate would need to be increased by a factor of approximately 2.13.
This would have the effect of increasing the mill rate from $237/$1000 assessed
evaluation to $505/$1000 assessed evaluation or a about a 113% increase. Although the
mill rate would increase approximately 113% the tax revenue collected would remain
the same due to the lower assessments.
• An analysis was also conducted to determine if a switch to the Town of Cortlandt
assessment roll would result in a percentage change between the amount of taxes paid
by commercial and non-commercial properties (one and two-family houses). There are
114 commercial properties (not counting the Half Moon Bay Condominiums and
Dockominiums which ORPS classifies as commercial). The results of the analysis are
shown in the table below. The percent of the total assessed valuation attributed to the
commercial properties is about 10% in both the Village and Town assessment rolls with
a slight 0.2% difference between the rolls. Switching to the Town of Cortlandt
assessment roll would shift about 0.2% of the tax burden from the commercial to the
non-commercial properties, a relatively minor shift.
Comparison of Croton and Cortlandt Assessment Rolls
Tel: 914-271-4783
www.crotononhudson-ny.gov
Fax: 914-271-3790
Municipality
Total Assessed
Commercial
Property
Valuation
Equalization
Rate (2011)
Total Market
Value
Commercial Property
Assessment as a
percentage of the Total
Property Assessed
Valuation
Croton
$4,383,255
3.71%
$118,147,035
10.1%
Cortlandt
$2,016,558
1.87%
$107,837,326
9.9%
• An analysis was also conducted to determine if a switch to the Town of Cortlandt
assessment roll would result in a percentage change between the amounts of taxes paid
by special franchises. The special franchises in the Village are listed in the table below.
These are basically the same franchises in the Town of Cortlandt’s assessment roll
however the Town has multiple assessments for some special franchises.
Special Franchise
Description
POLES, WIRES, CABLES, ETC.
TELEPORT COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPRINTER
VERIZON
RAILROAD CEILING
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
SPECIAL FRANCHISE #631900
VERIZON NEW YORK INC
SPECIAL FRANCHISE #110700
CON EDISON CO OF NEW YORK
SPECIAL FRANCHISE #928300
CABLEVISION OF OSSINING
SPECIAL FRANCHISE #60170
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS INC
SPECIAL FRANCHISE #725500
CABLEVISION SYSTEM LIGHTPATH
• Summary information about the special franchise assessments is provided in the table
below. The percent of the total assessed valuation attributed to the special franchises is
2.59% in the Village and 3.17% in the Town assessment rolls with a 0.58% difference
between the rolls.
Municipality Total Special
Franchise
Assessed
Valuation
Equalization
Rate (2011)
Total Special
Franchise
Market Value
Special
Franchise
assessment
percent of Total
Assessment
Croton
$1,144,788.00
3.71%
$31,107,628.03
2.59%
Cortlandt
$ 667,226.00
1.87%
$35,680,534.76
3.17%
Subject:
Comparison of Croton and Cortlandt Assessment Rolls
Tel: 914-271-4783
www.crotononhudson-ny.gov
Fax: 914-271-3790
• There are 230 parcels coded “vacant land” on the Village assessment roll.
• If the Town of Cortlandt’s assessment roll were adopted many properties would see a
change in their assessment both positive and negative. This would translate into either
an increase or decrease in the amount of taxes paid as compared to taxes paid prior to
the change in assessment rolls.
• Some basic statistics on the changes that would result from the adoption of the Town
assessment rolls are as follows:
o There would be a reduction of tax assessment for 2251 parcels ranging from
.08% to 97.4% which relates to a corresponding reduction in taxes paid by
owners of these properties.
Note: some research still needs to be done on the high end decrease
assessments to determine if any revisions to the current assessment of
these properties should be made.
o There are 860 parcels that would see an increase in assessment ranging from
.01% to 6843.9% which relates to a corresponding increase in taxes paid by
owners of these properties. The two individual greatest assessment increases are
for Arrowcrest HOA conservation land. This is due to historic variations in land
assessment valuations between the individual municipalities.
Note: some research still needs to be done on the high end increase in
assessments which include conservation lands and vacant lands to
determine if any revisions to the current assessment of these properties
should be made.
• The table and graph below show a break down of the changes in calculated market
values of properties if the Village assumed the Town of Cortlandt’s assessment roll.
These changes are numerous and therefore for simplicity are grouped into ranges of
percent changes. The graph of these grouped percent changes is considered range
normal. The normal distribution however should not prevent further inquiry into the
extreme variations.
Comparison of Croton and Cortlandt Assessment Rolls
Tel: 914-271-4783
www.crotononhudson-ny.gov
Fax: 914-271-3790
Range of
change in
calculated
market value
Number of
properties
Total calculated market value
of all properties in change of
market value range prior to
assessment change
Total calculated
market value of all
properties in change
of market value
range after to
assessment change
-100% to -90%
$1,269,137.47
$70,755.61
>-90% to -80%
$673,854.45
$106,951.87
>-80% to -70%
$732,479.78
$188,502.67
>-70% to -60%
$2,803,234.50
$1,005,347.59
>-60% to -50%
$3,100,404.31
$1,387,700.53
>-50% to -40%
$31,445,202.16
$17,536,524.06
>-40% to -30%
$54,172,911.05
$34,805,347.59
>-30% to -20%
$122,958,463.61
$94,003,475.94
>-20% to -10%
$301,826,900.27
$257,239,144.39
>-10% to 0%
$314,896,927.22
$298,627,005.35
> 0% to 10%
$186,863,531.00
$195,007,486.63
>10% to 20%
$78,873,962.26
$90,053,529.41
>20% to 30%
$34,973,989.22
$43,450,802.14
>30% to 40%
$14,326,280.32
$19,299,465.24
>40% to 50%
$7,897,654.99
$11,522,459.89
>50% to 60%
$3,609,164.42
$5,570,855.61
>60% to 70%
$3,215,902.96
$5,327,272.73
>70% to 80%
$2,575,471.70
$4,502,673.80
>80% to 90%
$1,624,663.07
$2,975,935.83
>90% to 100%
$1,707,951.48
$3,364,705.88
>100% to 200%
$762,129.38
$2,058,823.53
>200%
$314,420.49
$1,795,454.55
Subject:
Comparison of Croton and Cortlandt Assessment Rolls
Tel: 914-271-4783
www.crotononhudson-ny.gov
Fax: 914-271-3790
Number of Properties with Calculated Market Value Change In
Specified Range
9 11 46 35
46 26 18 11 11 4
4 8
-100% to -90%
>-90% to -80%
>-80% to -70%
>-70% to -60%
>-60% to -50%
>-50% to -40%
>-40% to -30%
>-30% to -20%
>-20% to -10%
>-10% to 0%
> 0% to 10%
>10% to 20%
>20% to 30%
>30% to 40%
>40% to 50%
>50% to 60%
>60% to 70%
>70% to 80%
>80% to 90%
>90% to 100%
>100% to 200%
>200%
Range of Calculated Market Value Change
Number of Properties
• The percent change in the calculated market value in the table above is equivalent to the
percent change in amount of taxes paid by a specific property owner. As an example
the table below shows the approximate increase in taxes paid for a property with a 50%
increase in calculated market value that would result from the change in assessment
rolls.
Assessment
Roll
Assessed
valuation
Equalization
Rate
Calculated
Market Value
Mill Rate/1000
assessed
valuation
Village Taxes
Paid based on
assessment roll
Croton
$14,000
3.71%
$377,358
$237
$3318
Cortlandt
$10,585
1.87%
$566,038
$505
$5345
Please note that this analysis did not include an evaluation of the administrative and
programmatic changes and any associated costs or inter-municipal issues. This analysis can be
completed if requested by the Village Board.
Please let us know if any additional information is needed.
cc:
Sandra Bullock, Village Treasurer,
File
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.