Public Comments - Agenda Items
agenda
4 pages
From the meeting:
Board Of Trustees — 2025-09-10
Agenda item: Public Comment - Agenda Items
Agenda, 4 pages. Attached to agenda item: “Public Comment - Agenda Items”
Retrieved 2026-04-15 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Extracted text
From:
Croton-on-Hudson NY via Croton-on-Hudson NY
To:
Manager"s Office
Subject:
Form submission from: Send Us Comments
Date:
Tuesday, September 9, 2025 7:09:14 AM
***CAUTION: External sender.***
Submitted on Tuesday, September 9, 2025 - 7:09am
Submitted values are:
Choose One: Public Comments for Board Meeting
Please include any questions or comments: With regard to the proposed signage at Silver Lake
regarding accessibility, it should be noted that this past Summer when I inquired of silver Lake
staff about accessibility by those with impaired mobility, they were unaware of any means to
do so. When I informed them that in the past those with impaired mobility were allowed to be
dropped off, they had no knowledge of such a policy, but thankfully I was referred to the
silver Lake supervisor who confirmed that this was so. Nevertheless, it is important that Silver
lake users and staff be informed clearly that access to this uniquely Croton recreation spot is
available to all
==Please provide the following information==
Your Name: James C. Miller
Email Address:
==Address==
Street: 18 wolf road
City: Croton on Hudson
State: New York
Zipcode: 10520
Organization:
Phone Number:
The results of this submission may be viewed at:
https://www.crotononhudson-ny.gov/node/2/submission/38221
From:
Lauren Davis
To:
Signs
Date:
Monday, September 8, 2025 8:13:06 PM
***CAUTION: External sender.***
Dear Board:
Everyone who comes down to Silver Lake knows about both paths. If the real reason is to alert people to the less
steep path, it seems unnecessary.
Perhaps you are thinking of putting in an escalator.
If this is really about helping people know where the less steep path is, ok.
Maybe this to legally adhere to some code; ok sign it is.
But more signs don’t make Croton friendlier. They just make it more “signy” - And in fact seems to lead some
people to make death threats (according to the recent uproar over a village resident’s large political signage).
This is a sacred place to many of us and the reason that it’s sacred is it’s quiet and calm and wooded and we don’t
need lots of lights and signage.
Thank you for your time
Respectfully,
Lauren Davis
14 Hamilton Avenue
Sent from my iPhone
From:
Nora Regis
To:
Board of Trustees; Manager"s Office
Subject:
Public comment in re: Letter from various Croton-on-Hudson and Croton-Harmon School District residents
regarding the recent adoption of the IHRA definition of antisemitism
Date:
Tuesday, September 9, 2025 4:57:51 PM
***CAUTION: External sender.***
Good afternoon,
I encourage you to adopt the clarifying language regarding the adoption of the IHRA
definition. Adopting the IHRA definition without clear guidelines like those suggested in the letter
by Silverglade et al. risks confusion about what speech and criticism are considered antisemitic, both
now and ten years from now, no matter who is serving on the board. While I appreciate Trustee
Simon’s assurances that the village only intends to adopt the first 40 words, I remain concerned that
his distinction will be missed in the future.
I previously alluded to this in my prior email to the board before the resolution, but I will make
myself more straightforward now. In my experience as a community forum administrator for The
Croton Point Facebook group, I’ve seen how vocal proponents of IHRA label good-faith discussions
or advocacy regarding Palestine as hate speech. Definitions are supposed to provide clarity into the
meaning of a word, but for some who promote IHRA, its vagueness is very much the point. One
member, who is on the record publicly endorsing IHRA for the school and town, told the admin team
that a link to a story by Amnesty International acknowledging Nakba Day was antisemitic and that
the post should either be removed or the offending member should be kicked out. While the
offending member has posted many times about Palestine (to the consternation of some in the
village), I could not understand why the specific Nakba post was considered hate speech. Through
conversation, I learned that they viewed it as akin to saying Israel does not have a right to exist or to
self-determination. She explained that this post is an example of why we need an agreed-upon
definition like IHRA. The member went on to say that by leaving this up, the admin team was
making Croton an unsafe place for Jewish people. This broke my heart as I would never ever want to
foster hate, but at the same time, I truly do not see how a post about disputed or controversial history
is doing that.
There are more examples like this one that I’d be happy to provide, but in the interest of brevity, I
will say that I felt unsafe remaining an admin of the group. I had parents who advocated for the
definition in the schools in my messages, saying they would tell everyone in town I was an
antisemite if I did not take the actions they wanted when it came to posts about Palestine. I avoided
going into town for about a month and kept my time at Summerfest short. They were not open to
compromise or seeing things from a different perspective, and they feel empowered by their personal
interpretation of this vague definition.
I believe that the trustees and mayor who voted for this resolution truly wanted to make members of
the community feel safe, and the forcefulness with which members spoke out about incidents of
antisemitism required urgency, which is perhaps why you were not open to considering other
definitions or writing your own. However, in your haste, I believe you’ve unintentionally created a
situation that could lead to more confusion and painful incidents down the line—including scenarios
like those I encountered as a Facebook admin, where community members accused each other and
the admin team of fostering hate.
I respectfully ask that the Board revisit its decision and add the suggested specific language to ensure
that the definition is applied fairly and clearly, so it protects the Village from real antisemitism while
allowing for open discussion about legitimate political issues. This will help all residents feel
welcome and safe, and ensure our policies serve the entire community.
Thank you for your time. Manager Healy, please read my remarks into the record.
--
Nora Regis Odland
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.