Milwoukee Wis St Louis, Mo Son Froncisco, Coht Boston, Moss Minneopoiis, Mmn
Nework, N J Cincinnoli, Ohio Atlonlo, Go Pittsburgh, Po Chicago, III
Philodelphio, Po Omoho, Nebr Norfolk, Vo Richmond, Vo Bridgeport, Conn
Cieveiond, Ohio Albuquerque, N Me« Boltimore, Md Binghomton, N Y Rochester, N Y
Detroit, Mich Foil River, Moss Memphis, Tenn Tucson, Ariz Dollos, Tex
Providence, R I Buffolo, N Y Butte, Mont Houston, Tex Louisville, Ky Wmston-Solem, N C Knoxville, Tenn Oklohomo City, Okia Denver, Colo Portlond, Mome
Cedor Ropids, lowo Indionopolis, Ind Columbia, S C Jocksonville, Flo Konsos City, Mo
Los Anqeles, Co lit New Orleons, La El Poso, Tex Solt Loke City, Utoh Clorksburg, W Vo
Columbus, Ohio Monchester, N H Little Rock, Ark Spokone, Wosh Seattle, Wosh Birminghom, Alo Wichita, Kons Mobile, Alo Portlond, Oreg
Percent
140 160
^
nr
-ZML
^
m
^=3
■=:f
^
WPA, Division of Social Research, "Intercity Difference* in Cost of Living -- 59 Cities," March, 1935.
Relative Rents for a 4-Person Manual Worker's Family in Each of 59 Cities in the United States, March, 1935.
1. The 100% line here gives a good measuring rod for comparisons.
2. The chart would be read as follows: the four cities, Detroit, Michigan, Fall River, Massachusetts, Memphis, Tennessee, and Tucson, Arizona, may be described as average cities so far as rent for a 4-person manual worker's family is concerned. Rents are relatively much higher in Washington, D. C, and New York City, and relatively much lower in Mobile, Alabama, and Portland, Oregon.