New York State
Croton View assessment challenge, 2025/26
The original petition challenges the Village’s assessment for the 2025/26 tax year, stating a total assessed value of $294,245 and seeking an assessed value of $52,600. No court-ordered reduction or refund is established by the displayed record.
- Case
- 61979/2025
- Court
- New York Supreme Court, Westchester County
- Record checked
Croton View Properties LLC c/o CVS Albany #05058-02 v. Board of Assessment Review and/or Assessor of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson and the Village of Croton-on-Hudson
The current position
Active electronic record; no ruling listed
The state electronic record checked October 16, 2026 lists 4 processed entries and Active status, with Justice Diane Clerkin assigned. Court case details list counsel for both sides. No valuation decision or settlement order is displayed.
Croton News will track orders, agreements and any recorded assessment change. No next court appearance is verified.
What the petition asks for
The original petition challenges the Village’s assessment for the 2025/26 tax year. It states a total assessed value of $294,245 and asks to reduce the assessment to $52,600. Those are assessed values, not market prices, tax bills, refunds or court awards.
Who is responding
The Village and its assessment authorities are named as respondents in their official roles. The assessor is not a personal claimant suing the Village. Court case details list a lawyer for the municipality.
What the court record shows
The electronic record checked October 16, 2026 is labeled Active and lists 4 processed entries. No valuation decision or settlement order is displayed. No next court appearance is verified.
The timeline
From the recordHow we got here
- Court filing
Assessment petition filed
The original petition challenges the Village’s 2025/26 assessment and requests a lower assessed value.
Why this matters: Starts this proceeding. The requested reduction has not been established as granted.
- Court filing
Service-affidavit filings recorded
The docket lists a personal-service affidavit and a mailing affidavit filed on this date.
Why this matters: Records that papers about delivery were filed; the labels do not establish how service occurred or whether it was legally sufficient.
- Court record
Village counsel recorded
Court case details record Joshua B. Subin as the Village’s lawyer on this date.
Why this matters: Shows representation for the municipality, without supplying a response on the assessment’s merits.
- Newsroom check
Electronic case record checked
The complete displayed list has four processed entries and Active status. No valuation decision or settlement order is displayed.
Why this matters: Dates this account of the available state electronic record. No next appearance or outcome is verified.