New York State
Hospital’s 2025 assessment challenge
Hudson Valley Hospital Center asks to reduce the Village’s 2025 assessment of the property identified as 35 South Riverside Avenue from $101,640 to $10,164. This annual petition is separate from the hospital’s 2022 assessment case.
- Case
- 60426/2025
- Court
- New York Supreme Court, Westchester County
- Record checked
Hudson Valley Hospital Center v. The Board of Assessors and/or the Assessor of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson and the Board of Assessment Review
The current position
Petition filed; outcome unverified
The state electronic file checked October 16, 2026 listed three processed documents: the petition and two service affidavits. No ruling appeared in that captured list. The page’s administrative status was marked Pre-RJI; that label alone does not establish a resolved outcome. No next court date is verified.
Follow any later court schedule, assessment ruling or documented resolution. No next court date is verified. A date printed in the petitioner’s notice is not proof that a hearing occurred or a court-set future appearance exists.
Which property and assessment year?
The petition identifies 35 South Riverside Avenue, section 78.8, block 5, lot 61. It concerns the Village’s 2025 assessment; the authorization identifies tax year 2025/26.
What reduction is requested?
Schedule A lists $101,640 as both original and confirmed assessed value, $10,164 as the requested assessment, and $91,476 as the difference contested. That difference is assessed value, rather than a stated tax-refund amount, market-price finding or court award.
What does the petitioner allege?
The hospital alleges an excessive, unequal and otherwise unlawful assessment and seeks court correction and costs. Its petition names the Village’s assessing authorities and Board of Assessment Review in their official roles. This is the hospital’s assessment challenge, rather than a personal lawsuit by an assessor.
Where does the record stand?
The captured electronic list contains the petition and two service filings. Those entries do not grant the requested reduction or establish a settlement. This file tracks the identified assessment year; other annual proceedings have their own records and schedules.
The timeline
From the recordHow we got here
- Court filing
2025 assessment petition filed
The hospital challenges the Village’s 2025 assessment of $101,640 for parcel 78.8-5-61 and requests an assessment of $10,164.
Why this matters: Identifies the year, property and relief requested. Filing the petition does not establish that the assessment is incorrect.
- Court filing
Service affidavits entered on docket
Two affidavits filed that day report delivery of the petition to the Village Clerk on April 7 and mailings to the county finance commissioner and school superintendent on April 8.
Why this matters: Documents the petitioner’s reported notification steps. These filings do not decide whether the assessment should be reduced.
- Newsroom check
Electronic record checked
The saved full list contains three processed filings and no ruling. Its administrative status is marked Pre-RJI.
Why this matters: Dates the reporting observation. It does not certify all paper or sealed records, a completed hearing or a merits outcome.