New York State
Maple Street’s 2024 assessment challenge
Maple 2005 LLC challenges a 2024 Village assessment of $84,920 and seeks to reduce it to $8,492. The petition and the Village’s final roll identify the same Maple Street parcel. The electronic docket lists the case as active.
- Case
- 60641/2024
- Court
- New York Supreme Court, Westchester County
- Record checked
Maple 2005 LLC v. The Village of Croton-on-Hudson, its Assessor and Board of Assessment Review
The current position
Assessment challenge pending
Active in the five-row state electronic record checked October 16, 2026, assigned to Justice Diane Clerkin. The docket lists June 2026 trial-calendar filings and an income-and-expense statement. No next court date is verified.
Watch for a court schedule, valuation ruling or recorded settlement. No next court date is verified. A past return date in a party’s notice does not establish that an appearance occurred.
Next newsroom review:
Which property and year?
The proceeding concerns the Village’s 2024 assessment of parcel 79.9, block 1, lot 77. Schedule A identifies 38–48 Maple Street. The Village’s 2024 final roll independently lists that address and parcel under Maple 2005 LLC. The authorization identifies Village tax year 2024/25.
2024 petition and assessment schedule · Village’s 2024 final assessment roll, Maple parcel entry
What is being requested?
The petition lists $84,920 as both tentative and final assessed value and asks for $8,492. Its $76,428 claimed over-assessment is a difference in assessed value, rather than a tax-refund amount or a court award. It also seeks repayment of taxes it alleges were unlawfully assessed, without stating a refund total.
What is the dispute about?
Maple 2005 LLC alleges an excessive, unequal and unlawful assessment and asks the court to correct it. The Village, assessor and assessment-review board are respondents in their official roles. These are the company’s allegations; the petition does not establish wrongdoing by an individual assessor or a tax saving owed to the company.
Where does the case stand?
The public docket lists June 5, 2026 filings labeled a note of issue without jury, an income-and-expense statement and a request for judicial intervention. These entries document filings, rather than a completed trial, accepted valuation or settlement. No next court date is verified.
The timeline
From the recordHow we got here
- Court filing
Maple 2005 files 2024 assessment petition
The company challenges the Village assessment of parcel 79.9-1-77, asking to reduce $84,920 to $8,492 and seeking repayment of allegedly unlawful taxes.
Why this matters: Defines the property, assessment year and requested relief. The request is not a finding that the assessment is wrong.
- Court filing
Service affidavit entered on docket
The docket lists an affidavit labeled service on the Village, county and school district.
Why this matters: Records a notice-of-proceeding step; it does not establish that the assessment challenge has been decided.
- Court filing
Trial-calendar and financial filings entered
The docket lists a note of issue without jury, an income-and-expense statement and a judicial-intervention request filed by the petitioner’s attorney.
Why this matters: Shows later activity in the case. These are filing entries, rather than a court decision about the assessment.