New York State
Sky View’s 2025 assessment challenge
Sky View Nursing Realty LLC seeks reductions in the Village’s 2025 assessments of two parcels identified at 1280 Albany Post Road. The petition lists a combined assessment of $434,032 and requests a lower assessment for each parcel.
- Case
- 60425/2025
- Court
- New York Supreme Court, Westchester County
- Record checked
Sky View Nursing Realty LLC v. The Board of Assessors and/or the Assessor of the Village of Croton-on-Hudson and the Board of Assessment Review
The current position
Petition filed; outcome unverified
The state electronic file checked October 16, 2026 listed three processed documents: the petition and two service affidavits. No ruling appeared in that captured list. The page’s administrative status was marked Pre-RJI; that label alone does not establish a resolved outcome. No next court date is verified.
Follow any later court schedule, assessment ruling or documented resolution. No next court date is verified. A date printed in the petitioner’s notice is not proof that a hearing occurred or a court-set future appearance exists.
Which property and assessment year?
The petition identifies two parcels at 1280 Albany Post Road: section 67.18, block 1, lots 1 and 2. It challenges the Village’s 2025 assessment; the authorization identifies tax year 2025/26.
What reduction is requested?
For lot 1, Schedule A lists $22,150 as original and confirmed assessed value and requests an assessed value of $2,215. For lot 2, it lists $411,882 and requests an assessed value of $41,188. The printed grand total is $434,032. These figures describe assessed values and requested reductions, not market prices, tax refunds or court awards.
What does the petitioner allege?
Sky View Nursing Realty LLC alleges that the assessments are excessive, unequal and otherwise unlawful. It seeks court correction and costs. The named respondents are the Village’s assessing authorities and Board of Assessment Review in their official roles. Those allegations do not establish misconduct by an individual assessor.
Where does the record stand?
The captured electronic list contains the petition and two service filings. Those entries do not grant the requested reduction or establish a settlement. This file tracks the identified assessment year; other annual proceedings have their own records and schedules.
The timeline
From the recordHow we got here
- Court filing
2025 assessment petition filed
The company challenges two 2025 Village assessments: $22,150 for lot 1 and $411,882 for lot 2, requesting assessed values of $2,215 and $41,188 respectively.
Why this matters: Identifies the year, property and relief requested. Filing the petition does not establish that the assessment is incorrect.
- Court filing
Service affidavits entered on docket
Two affidavits filed that day report delivery of the petition to the Village Clerk on April 7 and mailings to the county finance commissioner and school superintendent on April 8.
Why this matters: Documents the petitioner’s reported notification steps. These filings do not decide whether the assessment should be reduced.
- Newsroom check
Electronic record checked
The saved full list contains three processed filings and no ruling. Its administrative status is marked Pre-RJI.
Why this matters: Dates the reporting observation. It does not certify all paper or sealed records, a completed hearing or a merits outcome.