JG Letter 2021
site plan
2 pages
Scanned/OCR — text may contain errors
From the meeting:
Conservation Advisory Council — 2025-12-09
· our coverage →
Agenda item: New Business — Franzoso, Mark - 23 Nordica Drive (79.13-4-64) Amended Minor Site Plan for Retaining Wall around Contour of the Property
Site plan, 2 pages. Attached to agenda item: “New Business — Franzoso, Mark - 23 Nordica Drive (79.13-4-64) Amended Minor Site Plan for Retaining Wall around Contour of the Property” (Text recovered by OCR — may contain errors.)
Retrieved 2026-04-15 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
23 Nordica Drive site plans 7.26.22
23 Nordica Memo to PB 12-02-2025 005
Draft Resolution 23 Nordica Dr. 2025
Measurement Photo
Minor Site Plan Resolution 23 Nordica Dr. 6.20.23.
Photos 23 Nordica
Revised Site Plan 23 Nordica 2025
Russell Davies Demand Letter.docx
Extracted text
Joel E. Gingold
55 Nordica Drive
November 18, 2021
Re: 23 Nordica Drive
To the Planning Board,
I hope this finds you all well. As I will not be able to attend the Public Hearing on
November 23, I am submitting my comments herein.
I do not have to remind the Board of the long, sordid history of the development of this
parcel as well as those above it on Piney Point Avenue. That history is replete with
violations of permits, commitments unfulfilled, work (authorized or not) performed
without the notification of neighboring property owners, the existence of ugly, visually
offensive chaos on the property for months, complete failure of village officials to oversee
the work and enforce those permits that did exist, etc., etc., etc. At present, we are not
comfortable that the property owner, his contractors and cognizant village officials will
follow and enforce established codes, laws, and regulations and that commitments made
by any of these individuals or organizations will be kept.
Consequently, whatever trust may have originally existed between the property owner(s)
and its neighbors has been totally destroyed. A similar lack of trust of village officials and
their ability and willingness to enforce established codes and regulations exists as well. It
is incumbent upon all of those involved to attempt to rebuild that trust before the project
proceeds too much farther.
My preference at this time would be for all permits for this parcel to be denied and for the
owner to be compelled to return the property to its original condition before any work was
performed in the area. However, | appreciate that this is unrealistic and that, ultimately,
construction will proceed. I also understand that a variance on the size of the parcel has
already been granted. So as your review of this project continues, I respectfully request that
you ensure at least the following:
I. That the structure planned for the parcel be constructed in strict accordance with all
applicable codes, laws, and regulations with no further variances or other departures and
that, especially, the setback regulations be rigorously adhered to.
2. That the size and appearance of the structure be compatible with the existing houses
in the area and it not stand out as an unsightly aberration in a quiet residential
neighborhood. When completed. the ambience of the neighborhood should not have been
changed for the worse.
3. That the aesthetics of the property, including any structures constructed, be a major
consideration. That additional trees and other vegetation be required to be planted to screen
the property from its neighbors and to present a presence compatible with the neighborhood
as it existed prior to any work being performed. That any retaining walls required be
constructed and screened so that they do not materially detract from the aesthetics of the
property and the neighborhood.
4. That a reasonable end date be established for the completion of the work. Little if
any progress has been made on the houses on Piney Point Avenue for months or even years
and the Nordica Drive property has been an unsightly quagmire for ages. We should not
have to live forever with this unfinished work
5. That the owner and his contractors be instructed to take whatever action is
necessary to prevent the washout of soil and debris during heavy rain or snow melt.
6. That the owner and his contractors be instructed to properly and discreetly store all
equipment and supplies each evening and to perform the construction in such a manner as
to minimize the disruption to the neighborhood, visual and otherwise. We have lived with
this hideous scar for far too long.
7. While it is probably not within the purview of the Planning Board, to use your best
efforts to make clear to village officials that they have an obligation to their constituents to
ensure that all work is performed in conformance with all permits, laws, and regulations
and that any commitments made by the owner or his contractors be met to the letter.
One final point. As you well know, this project and its compatriots on Piney Point Avenue
have generated a great deal of animosity among the residents of the neighborhood toward
the owner(s) and the contractor(s) and this was not helped by the owner’s publicly referring
to those who wish to see the work performed properly as “crazy people.” If this project
cannot be brought under tight control, and this animosity continues to build, I fear that it
may ultimately be directed at the innocent individuals who ultimately purchase to house.
Something that none of us wishes to see. We are a close-knit neighborhood and we look
forward to welcoming new residents in the future just as we have in the past. I hope you
will use whatever authority you may have to ensure that this occurs.
May I also extend my best wishes to you and your families for a very Happy Thanksgiving
Joel E. Gingold
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.