Survey Draft
map survey
4 pages
Meeting: portal event 900 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: Correspondence — Memo from Village Manager Bryan Healy regarding a public survey drafted by the Telecommunications Advisory Committee.
Map / plans, 4 pages. Attached to agenda item: “Correspondence — Memo from Village Manager Bryan Healy regarding a public survey drafted by the Telecommunications Advisory Committee.”
Retrieved 2026-04-15 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
Survey memo
Extracted text
For some time now all the residents have been aware of the irregular cell phone service in the
Village. We are in the process of developing an overall plan to improve the situation in a meaningful
way. To that end, we have been doing testing and are searching for solutions. We’d like your help to
confirm problem areas and explore different possible options. Thank you for your help.
1. What is your current cellular service provider (check as many boxes as appropriate)?
A. Verizon
B. T-Mobile
C. AT&T
D. Dish
E. Other (please enter the name)
2. Please rate your satisfaction with your cellular service throughout the Village:
A. Excellent
B. Very Good
C. Good
D. Fair
E. Poor
3. Where do you feel it is most important to improve cell service within the Village? (Please try to
be specific by using road names and intersections, if possible. If you can’t, then any description
you can provide will be helpful.)
•
Text box. Evaluation of this text would be conducted using Word Clouds to find
frequently mentioned locations. Manual review of this content would be outside the
scope of our proposal.
4. In order to improve the quality of your cell service, assuming every possible consideration
would be given to safety and visual impact, would you support a new tower being built in your
neighborhood?
A. Yes
B. No
5. The most common type of cell tower is known as a monopole. It is the type of tower that
currently exists at the train station (140 feet high), as pictured below. This is the type of tower
that the cell service providers generally prefer, and there will be limited ability to control what
is proposed.
A
Monopole
(height of 140’)
Other options may be available. Below are some examples of some “hidden” cell towers that
could be constructed. However, the choice of any of these will also be site specific.
Flagpole
Faux Pine Tree
Faux Clock Tower
(Possibly to be
mounted on top of
the Municipal
Building)
Faux Water Tower
Question: Would you be willing to accept a Monopole cell tower if no alternatives are available?
A. Yes
B. No
6. If you think you could support a new tower in your neighborhood, and understanding that the
taller the tower is, the stronger the signal will be, how tall of a tower would you accept. Please
note that as a general rule of thumb, the height of a two-story house is typically between 18 to
25 feet from the ground to the roof ridge.
A. 75 feet
B. 100 feet
C. 150 feet
D. Whatever height is necessary to provide the best possible service
7. There are areas in our Village that may only be able to be well served by “Small cell” installations
(such as the ones shown below). Small cells have a much smaller coverage than the towers and
therefore more of them will be needed to service those areas where service cannot be improved
by additional towers.
Small
Cell
Small
Cell
Utility
Pole
Utility
Pole
Light Pole
Please indicate if you would be ok with these kinds of installations if the area only allows for this
type of solution
A.
Yes
B.
No
8. What would be your chief area of concern (if any) about taking steps to improve the cell service
in our Village?
A. Aesthetics/Visual disruption
B. Health & Safety
C. Installation logistics
D. Property values
E. Other (please enter the area of concern)
F. Not concerned
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.