Documents

application 4 pages Scanned/OCR — text may contain errors

Also attached to this agenda item: 325 S. Riverside Ave. - Coastal Assessment Form Dated... 325 S. Riverside Ave. - Narrative Dated July 10%2C 2024 325 S. Riverside Ave. - Special Permit Application... 325 S. Riverside Avenue Renderings from ARQ... 325 S. Riverside Avenue Updated Renderings from ARQ... Letter from Village Planning Board Dated August 7%2C 2024 Memo from WAC re%3A LWRP review of South Riverside...

| Short Environmental Assessment Form | | Instructions for Completing | Part 1 ~ Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item, please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. | Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the | lead agency; attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. | | Part 1 — Project and Sponsor Information 325 South Riverside Avenue Save-Mor Pharmacy 325 South Riverside Avenue, Croton-on-Hudson (Nearest Intersection/Cross Street = South Riverside Avenue. & Oneida Avenue) Proposed new three(3)-story Mixed-Use Building (1st Floor - Retail, 2nd Floor - Commercial, 3rd Floor - Residential) and associated site improvement; and demolition of existing one(1)-story commercial building. } Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (914) 944-3377 Jorge B. Hernandez, R.A. (SPONSOR) E-Mail: RJM@ARQPC.COM ARQ Architecture, P.C., 100 Executive Boulevard, Suite 204, City/PO: State: Zip Code: Ossining, New York 10562 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan, local law, ordinance, may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit, approval or funding from any other government Agency? | If Yes, list agency(s) name and permit or approval: _ Village Planning Board - Approval Village Zoning Board of Appeals - Approval 3. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.33 acres b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.33 acres c. Total acreage (project site and any contiguous properties) owned | or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.33 acres ! 4. Check all land uses that occur on, are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. [Urban [[) Rural (non-agriculture) [2] Industrial [YZ] Commercial ZZ] Residential (suburban) [") Forest [[] Agriculture [-] Aquatic [_] Other(Specify): (J) Parkland | | | Page | of 3 | i | | | 5. Is the proposed action, | | a, A permitted use under the zoning regulations? Cv} | b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? | 1} | 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7] | felled | 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in, or does it adjoin, a state listed Critical Environmental Area? | If Yes, identify: jini | | 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? iran b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? fmliral c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ] action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? H If No, describe method for providing potable water: ola If No, describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ole b. Is the project site, or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for [J 13. a, Does any portion of the site of the proposed action, or lands adjoining the proposed action, contain : wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal, state or local agency? iin) b. Would the proposed action physically alter, or encroach into, any existing wetland or waterbody? inl inl If Yes, identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Sf CShoreline [[] Forest [[] Agricultural/grasslands [[] Early mid-successional C] Wetland ([[] Urban wf Suburban Federal government as threatened or endangered? || 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge, either from point or non-point sources? | i fanie a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? iraliml b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems (runoff and storm drains)? mira Storm Water discharge will be directed to the existing Village Storm Drain System as an overflow from on-site infiltration system. cy 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water | If Yes, explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: | 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste | If Yes, describe: | 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation (ongoing or | completed) for hazardous waste? | If Yes, describe: Applicant/sponsor/name: Jorge B. Hernandez, R.A. (SPONSOR) Date: July 10, 2024 | Signature: C) prge EB. 9 ornantdLle ZL. Title: President | a | | | PRINT FORM Page 3 0f 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, July 10, 2024 1:21 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist | vA) AA. oe ject d ine ee \ 5 tal Te et Maasai” 10439 apo assessment form (EAF) Not all questions asked in the EAF are | ‘ 79.13-1-10 ‘ 4 eA answered by the EAF Mapper. Additional information on any EAF \ eS ‘ ” » question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although | \& the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to A Ay NS 79.13-1-58 79.13-1-33 DEC, you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order | \ to obtain data not provided by the Mapper. Digital data is not a ‘ \ ; ? ba substitute for agency determinations. } vi y y REED Seni uel} | Ges GN ” CDN tis nome Ne (7913460 \ A, | emer man i iy ; fens ae) 79.13-1-56 7 Bes) Me PR | \ { Be Cort ndt Torgnto Core Onions heBs Poe SC UEE G. On Oaee | \79.13-1-89\ Ce Y neremmmateet kaa 1. a y/o fhamilfon Rochester (Se Veep yaad iS @4 79.13-4-55 | : se ci en ene bs SS Buttato PANE Vote EE fs A ea 79.134-88 O \e79. 13-1751 ; gk Jats Pig 8 amar aX J aha. Ni a ee ONE Aaa se eam \ Oy cae ac. \ > Boe etch ae: tea soe AR O48 A S. eDpeti| | os Tetras trad | 79.13-1-87 /\\& we reg Est, HERE Garmio, USGS IhtermagygNcReMseht es HA Sources: Esty, se Sanne JIS65 neiMap Wis din “bel ea a Rear E64 ebay ETI Es Cra larg Kors eve kotea, Esu China (Hong Kandi Esri Korea, Gant sthailapd /NGCS, *¢: Oper StreetMarkcon ributos ange Tharaqd) NGC (g; OpanstreatMapicortiacatars ard the GIs \ Nye Mh fat a Ne Nee aati Eat ba fn User Corinth, Esn HERE Garin, PESOS NPS 4 Part 1/ Question 7 {Critical Environmental Yes Answer has been revised to No based on site specific research, see Area] response below Part 1 / Question 7 [Critical Environmental | Name:Hudson River, Reason:Exceptional or unique character, 1 Area - Identify} Agency:Westchester County, Date:1-31-90 Part 1 / Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] 4 Part 1/ Question 12b [Archeological Sites) Yes Answer has been revised to No based on site specific research, see Part 1 / Question 13a [Wetlands or Other No fesponse below Regulated Waterbodies} ; 5 Part 1/ Question 15 {Threatened or Yes Answer has been revised to No based on site specific research, see Endangered Animal] response below 9 Part 1/ Question 15 [Threatened or Shortnose Sturgeon, Bald Eagle, Atlantic Sturgeon Endangered Animal - Name] Part 1/ Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] No 3 Part 1/ Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes Answer has been revised to No based on site specific research, see response below 1 The site is NOT located in the Hudson River CEA. The Hudson River CEA extends from the Hudson River inland to Route 9. 2 The site does not contain Shortnose Sturgeon or Alantic Sturgeon these are found in the Hudson River. The site also does not contain Bald Eagles, these however are know to exist in the area especially along the Croton River and Hudson River 3 The EAF Mapper responded with a YES answer likely due to the nearby MNR Harmon Railroad Yard site and the Hudson River PCB sediments 4 The EAF Mapper responded with a YES answer likely due to the nearby archaeological sites on Croton Point. Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1