croton.news
Croton’s #1 source for AI-generated hyperlocal news
Croton-on-Hudson, New York · Friday, July 31, 2026· Jul 31, 2026
Source-linkedCorrections welcomed
DocumentsBoard Of Trustees, 2022-07-05

WAC Memo Grand St Retaining Wall

resolution 2 pages
From the meeting: Board Of Trustees — 2022-07-05
Agenda item: Proposed Resolutions — Consider adoption of a finding of consistency with the Village's LWRP to replace a one hundred foot retaining wall at 25 and 33 Grand Street.
Resolution, 2 pages. Attached to agenda item: “Proposed Resolutions — Consider adoption of a finding of consistency with the Village's LWRP to replace a one hundred foot retaining wall at 25 and 33 Grand Street.”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal. View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item: Grand Street LWRP Letter from Westchester County LWRP Grand Street Retaining Wall NYS DOS LWRP Memo Res 110-22 LWRP - Grand Street
ANN GALLELLI Members STUART GREENBAUM LEN SIMON LEO WIEGMAN Attorney LINDA WHITEHEAD Village Engineer DANIEL O’CONNOR, P.E. TO: Mayor Brian Pugh and the Village Board of Trustees FROM: Chairman Gallelli, Waterfront Advisory Committee RE: Referral from the Village Board for a Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Consistency Review for HUD funding to replace an existing one hundred foot long retaining wall at 33 Grand Street. DATE: June 28th, 2022 On June 27th, 2022, the Waterfront Advisory Committee (WAC) reviewed the above-referenced referal for consistency with the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). Based on the review of the 44 LWRP policies and made a recommendation of consistency. The vote was 4-0, all in favor. The committee reviewed the 44 LWRP policies and determined that the following policies were relevant: POLICY 1A: Existing planning and zoning documents should be reviewed and amended where necessary to ensure development within the community is consistend with adopted goals and policies. The replacement of the old cracked retaining wall with a new retaining wall will ensure the long term stability of the ground above the wall and preserve and safe guard vehicle and pedestrian use of Grand Street right of way. POLICY 7F: Construction activity of any kind must not cause a measurable increase in erosion or flooding at the site of such activity, or impact other locations. Construction activity shall be timed so that sprawning of anadromous fish species and shellfish will not be adversly affected. POLICY 11A: Erosion and sediment control measures shall be undertaken in order to safeguard persons, protect property, prevent damage to the environment, and promote the public welfare by guiding, regulating and controlling the design, construction, use and maintenance of any development or other activity which disturbs or breaks the topsoil or results in earth movement. POLICY 37A: Standards and specificatioins for the control of non-point source discharge as set forth in Westchester County’s Best Management Practice Manual or other regognized reference shall be utilized during development of any site. The existing wall is cracked in multiple locations and a new replacement retaining wall will ensure the long term stability of the sloping grouond above the wall. An erosion and sediment control plan using best management practices will be implemented during consturction. POLICY 13: The construction or reconstruction of erosion protection structures shall be undertaken only if they have a reasonable probability of controlling erosion for at least thirty years as demonstrated in design and construction standards and/or assured maintenance or replacement programs. The proposed redi-rock type concrete unit retaining wall is designed to last greater than 30 years. The WAC believes that the proposed replacement of the failing retaining wall will not have any potentially significant adverse impacts on coastal resources and is consistent with the LWRP policy standards. Because there are no expected adverse impacts on coastal resources, there is no reason to consider alternative actions or mitigation measures. It is for the reasons contained in this memorandum that the WAC issues its recommendation of consistency.

Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.

Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.