Graphic Methods for Presenting Facts
;ent
i
''LASf
ilFIET
"KLY
EART
IINQ5
//i
:n
y// 111
y
''' f
^r
r ,' ll
y /
/ ll
>
/
1 p I ^
/
/' /
'// '
i>^
/ /
f' 1 1
^^^^
//
' / /
-^'
"^
///
^
:-r'
.-<
//
/ /
(0
/
,^'
' 1
/
f •
Z <"
/."■
^^^^
c
//
<3
//
^
'^
/
111:1 >- o
>y
^x:^'
■ Q
'/
/
^
xy
/•?
^,
Ul
/ 1
^>7
^"
//
rf i
"/
..</
1 /
/
/ a
/
j 1
/
/
t 7
/
/ y
/
ll
/ /
/
/
/ /
/
/
ll
/ /
1 /
1 /'
v
/
/
i,^
1/
/ i
1/
/ /
/ /
-DASH
ED BL/
CK: Ur
IITED £
TATES
/ /
t
/ / / /
DIVIE
IONS
if
//b-re
D: N. A
TLANT
E-B
LUE: S
OUTH ;i
TLANl
ll
/ C-DC
T. BLU
E: N, C
ENTR^
L F-D
OTTED
red: s
. CENT
ral
1, //
D-Bl
ACK: \
VESTE
G-D
OTTED
BLACK
: ALA5
Courtesy of Factory
Fig. 154. Comparison of Earnings of Men Wage Earners in Different Portions of
the United States in 1905
This chart is almost hopelessly confused because the scales have been so arranged that the two scale zeros appear at the upper left-hand comer of the chart instead of at the lower left-hand comer. The vertical scale reads downward when it should read upward. See Fig. 155 for these same data redrawn