[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] 3 preme Court of this State, or for further or other security, although the removal was perfected in May,1884, and a verdict was not rendered till June, 1885, and judgment was not entered thereon until August 12, 1885. POINTS. First. There is no pretence that the acceptance of the security was obtained by fraud,or that since its ac- ceptance circumstances have changed, so that the security which was then good and sufficient, does not continue to be so. | But it is claimed that the security accepted or approved, was insufficient in amount; while not conceding that the defendant in error is entitled to have the action of the Circuit Judge in that be half reviewed here on his present showing, we say the claim is groundless. I.—'To sustain iis position the defendant in error attempts to impeach the undertaking given on dis- charging the attachment, and in support thereof cites the ease of Nichols against MacLean, 98 +N.