Tuesday, July 21, 2026 RSS  ·  Calendar
croton.news
Croton’s #1 source for AI-generated hyperlocal news
Croton-on-Hudson, New York
Source-linkedCorrections welcomed

Mexican National Construction Co. v. Reusens — SCOTUS Brief (1885)

SCOTUS Brief on behalf of the Plaintiff in Error, U.S. Reports Vol. 118, p. 49 Passage 20 of 55 131 words

[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] But this act shall not prevent a justification on the part of such com- pany through its officers, as required by law or other sureties.”’ | | A copy of this undertaking is annexed to the motion papers, and marked Schedule ‘ A.”’ It was allowed by one of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, against the protest and objection of the plaintiff in error on or about the 23d day of February, 1884. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, that gave this undertaking, did so under a special rule of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, adopted by said Court after the passage of the above Act of 1881. | 4 The rule is as.

Passages from this source (55)

Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.