Tuesday, July 21, 2026 RSS  ·  Calendar
croton.news
Croton’s #1 source for AI-generated hyperlocal news
Croton-on-Hudson, New York
Source-linkedCorrections welcomed

Mexican National Construction Co. v. Reusens — SCOTUS Brief (1885)

SCOTUS Brief on behalf of the Plaintiff in Error, U.S. Reports Vol. 118, p. 49 Passage 23 of 55 226 words

[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] Whee- ler, sitting as Circuit Judge, and a jury, and a ver- dict was rendered in favor of the defendant in error and against the plaintiff in error for the sum of $27,708.05, and on or about August 12th,1885, judg- ment was entered against the plaintiff in error for the sum of $28.062.86, and notice thereof was on that day duly served upon the attorney for the plaintiff in error. On or about the 22d day of August, 1885, a writ of error was allowed by the Honorable William J. Wallace, Circuit Judge, and a citation was issued thereupon to the defendant in error returnable on the second Monday of October, 1885. This action is now upon the docket of this Hon- orable Court by the number 980.) | Upon-allowing the writ of error, a bond, as secu- rity to the defendant in error, was approved by the Circuit Judge, a copy of which is annexed to the motion papers, marked ‘‘ Schedule B.”’ Said writ of error was allowed, and said bond was approved without any notice whitever to the defendant in error, or his attorneys or counsel. ‘the bound given. by the plaintiff in error at the time the writ of error was allowed is a bond with two sureties in the sum of only five thousand dol- lars.

POINTS.

Passages from this source (55)

Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.