[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] The motion for further security should be denied with costs, and under no circumstances can the writ of error be dismissed. | THEODORE F. H. MEYER, _Att’y for the Plaintiff in Error. Jos. H. CHOATE, Of Counsel. . _IN THE Supremedton of the Tuite Sates, THE MEXICAN NATIONAL Con- STRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, 0S. GUILLAUME REUSENS, Defendant in Error. Brief on behalf of the Defendant in Error on motion to compel Plaintiff in Error to furnish additional secu- rity. STATEMENT OF FACTs. This action was commenced in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, in February, 1884, by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover a sum of money only, to wit, the sim of twenty-five thousand dollars, as for money had and received by the plaintiff in error to the use of the defendant in error. Thereafter and on or about the 6th er of Feb- ruary, 1884, the defendant in error obtained a war- - rant of attachment in due, form of law against the property of the plaintiff in error, in said action in said Supreme Court, pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of New York; said attach- 2 ment was duly served by the Sheriff of the City and County of.