Documents

resolution 2 pages

Also attached to this agenda item: CAF 7-8-11 2 EAF 7-7-11 Memo to VB on Supplementing List of Type II Actions PB memo to VB PB memo to VB 7-26-11 recirculation Resolution recirculating revised law CAF and EAF-Type II Revised Local Law Type II clean version Revised Planning Board Resolution clean version TypeII-VillEngineer Type II-PolChief Type II. Neg Dec attachment 1 Type II actions prelim consistency 4-27-11 DRAFT

CHARLIE KAE Members A GALLELLI STUART GREEBAUM BRUCE KAUDERER IA MURTAUGH Attorney JAMES STAUDT Village Engineer DAIEL O’COOR, P.E. ROIE ROSE WATERFRO T ADVISORY COMMITTEE To: Mayor Wiegman and the Board of Trustees From: Charlie Kane, Waterfront Advisory Committee Chair CC: Abe Zambrano Janine King Paula DiSanto Dan O’Connor WAC Committee Subject: Proposed adoption of Local Law Introductory o. 2 of 2011 which would amend Chapter 116 to supplement the list of Type II actions contained in the ew York State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulations and proposed determinations of the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Police Chief, and Village Engineer—Final Consistency Review Date: ovember 1, 2011 On October 27, 2011, the Waterfront Advisory Committee (WAC) reviewed for consistency with the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) the above-referenced referral from the Village Board about the proposed adoption of Local Law Introductory No. 2 of 2011. The WAC had previously reviewed this referral for consistency on July 18, 2011 and had issued a preliminary recommendation of consistency. The WAC members noted on October 27, 2011 that there have been no changes to this application since the preliminary recommendation, and therefore, the WAC voted to issue a final recommendation of consistency. The vote was 3 to 0, all in favor. WAC members Chairman Kane, Ms. Gallelli, and Mr. Kauderer were present at the meeting. The WAC evaluated this referral for consistency in accordance with the LWRP policy standards and conditions set forth in section 225-6(J) of the Village Code, which are further explained and described in Section III of the LWRP. Because there are no expected adverse impacts on coastal resources, there is no reason to consider alternative actions or mitigation measures. It is for the reasons contained in this memorandum that the WAC issues its final recommendation of consistency. CK/rr