[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] Dated New York, February 25, 1884, C. Donohue, J.”’; and so endorsed, caused the same to be duly filed. That therenpon the property attached was re- leased pursuant to the order of the Judge. | That said Reusens did not appeal from the de- cision of the Court’ overruling his. objection, and accepting or approving the said under- taking and guarantee thereof; nor did the siid Reusens thereafter take any steps to obtain a re- view thereot by appeal or otherwise ; that the time to appeal to the General ‘Term of said Court from the ruling and determination of the judge presiding at Special Term had expired, when, on the fifth day of May, 1884. the cause was duly removed to the Cireuit Couit of the United States for the Southern District of New York, at the instance of the plaintiff in error; that thereafter the said Reusens did not take any steps in the last mentioned Court to obtain either a review of said determination as to the sufficiency of said undertaking and guarantee, or a rehearing of that matter, nor did he apply for further or other security, although the -case_ cited on the brief on behalf of the defendant in er- ror, viz: Nichols 7s. MacLean, 98 N.