[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] MEYER, being duly sworn, says, that he-is the attorney for the defendant in this action; that the action was commenced in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Feb- rnary, 1884; that an attachment was issued in this action against the property of the defendant, which attachment was discharged by an order duly made on the 11th day of February, 1884, upon the de- fendant giving an undertaking in the sum of twen- ty-nine thousand dollars that the defendant will 0.1 demand pay to the plaintiff the amount of any judgment which may be recovered in the action against the defendant not exceeding the above mentioned sum, with interest, which undertaking was approved by a Justice of the said Supreme Court, from whence the suit was thereafter duly removed to this Court. That thereafter this case was tried before the Hon. Hoyt H. Wheeler and a jury, and a verdict rendered on the 4th day of June, 1885, for $27,708. .05 in favor of the plaintiff and against the defend- ant, and on the 12th day of August, 1885, judg- ment was entered on such verdict, with interest S