Trustees demand Metro-North safety fixes at Harmon Yards
The Croton-on-Hudson Board of Trustees voted 4-0 to send a formal letter to Metro-North demanding safety improvements at Harmon Yards, where volunteer first responders responded to 89 calls in 10 months often without MTA guidance. Trustees also received updates on the shoreline resiliency study, the conclusion of the Community Choice Aggregation Program, and potential shared services with the Croton-Harmon school district.
✓ Verified against official minutes⚠ Predates our automated verification gate
An early article, drafted by AI before our automated verification gate existed. It has not been machine-checked against the meeting record and may contain errors.
Published under the editorial responsibility of
Matthew Broudy,
who is accountable for every article on this site.
●*Resolution 1*: Authorized the Village Manager to send a formal letter to Metro-North Railroad regarding severe safety and access concerns at Harmon Yards. Passed 4-0 (Trustee Politi absent). No dollar amount attached.
●Resolutions Failed
●Applications Reviewed
●None (this was a Work Session, not a regular meeting with Planning Board/ZBA items).
●Public Comments
●None recorded during this Work Session.
●Reports
●Arts & Humanities Advisory Council: Provided an update on the village artist banner program.
●Village Manager (Bryan Healy):
●Delivered an update on the ongoing shoreline resiliency study.
●Reported on the Con Edison rate case settlement.
●Announced the conclusion of the Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) Program.
●Led a review of existing intermunicipal agreements for shared services, including a discussion on establishing a new agreement with the Croton-Harmon Union-Free School District.
●Board of Trustees: Continued reviewing guidelines and procedures for village advisory boards and committees, and reviewed drafts of the social media policy and Board of Trustees rules of procedure.
The Board of Trustees conducts a meeting with presenters during discussion of funding for new art banners.
Croton’s volunteer first responders are facing dangerous delays at Harmon Yards, prompting the Board of Trustees to demand immediate action from Metro-North Railroad.
During a Work Session on November 12, the board voted 4-0 to send a strongly worded letter to the railroad outlining a pattern of safety failures that Mayor Pugh and Trustees Nicholson, Simon, and Slippen say is straining local emergency resources.
The letter, addressed to Metro-North's Andrew Buder, reveals that between January and October of this year, the Croton Fire Department responded to 50 calls inside the yards—an average of five per month—while Croton EMS handled 39 calls. While 28% of the fire calls occurred overnight, the most alarming issue is what happens when crews arrive.
According to the village, first responders frequently arrive to find no MTA personnel onsite to guide them to the source of the alarm. In many cases, private security guards at the gate are completely unaware an alarm is sounding. "This forces our volunteers to search the property to locate the potential emergency — losing valuable time that could make the difference in a true emergency," the board wrote.
The vast majority of the alarms are triggered by train smoke, but the village stressed that each requires a full emergency response. The board offered three specific solutions: requiring MTA personnel to meet crews at the gate, giving private security real-time alarm access, and deploying the MTA fire brigade to screen alarms before calling in outside help.
Beyond the Harmon Yards issue, the board received a progress update on the village's shoreline resiliency study, a critical project for waterfront property owners. Officials also discussed the conclusion of the village's Community Choice Aggregation Program and a recent settlement in the Con Edison rate case.
Looking at local partnerships, Village Manager Bryan Healy led a discussion on existing shared services and the potential for a new intermunicipal agreement with the Croton-Harmon Union-Free School District. The board also continued its ongoing review of internal governance, looking over drafts of a new social media policy and updated rules of procedure for the Board of Trustees, as well as guidelines for village advisory boards. Trustee Politi was absent from the meeting.
Source documents:
●Motion to enter executive session for personnel matters (4-0 vote at 8:44 PM).
●Motion to adjourn executive session (unanimous vote at 9:16 PM).
●Resolutions Passed
●Resolution #243-2025: Rejects the single bid received on September 4, 2025, for the installation and commissioning of a solar canopy at the DPW Garage. Passed 3-0 (Trustees Politi and Slippen absent). Dollar amount: N/A (project to be funded by NYSERDA grants).
●Resolutions Failed
●Applications Reviewed
●Public Comments
●None recorded.
●Reports
●Superintendent of Public Works Frank Balbi provided an update on general department operations and ongoing projects.
●Village Manager Bryan Healy and the Board discussed an expansion of the residential parking permit system targeting Hastings and Young avenues.
●Village Manager Bryan Healy and the Board discussed a proposed Length of Service Award Program (LOSAP) for Croton EMS.
execute an agreement with OMNIA Partners, Public Sector, Inc. for the cooperative purchasing of supplies and equipment.; Review of Proposed Legislation to Create a Rental Unit Registry.; Discussion on the Addition of Alternate Members to the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals. — plus 2 mo...
●Board and Committee Appointments: Approved 8 volunteer appointments to village boards with terms expiring between December 2026 and December 2028. Vote: 5-0.
●Resolutions Failed
●Applications Reviewed
●Public Comments
●None noted in the minutes.
●Reports
●DPW Garage Site Visit: Superintendent of Public Works Frank Balbi joined the Board to discuss their recent site visit to the Department of Public Works Garage.
●Bond Rating Presentation: Financial advisor Beth Ferguson presented an update on the Village's current bond rating.
●Draft Budget Priorities Survey: The Board reviewed the draft survey intended to gather community input for the upcoming fiscal year's budget.
●Recreation Advisory Committee: The Board discussed recent recommendations presented by the committee.
●Proposed Local Law: Discussed a proposal to create a local office of the Village Auditor.
●Resolutions Passed: None.
●Resolutions Failed: None.
●Applications Reviewed: None.
●Public Comments: None.
●Reports: None.
●Executive Session: The Board met from 9:06 PM to 9:42 PM to discuss matters of personnel involving specific individuals. Motion to enter made by Trustee Simon, seconded by Trustee Nicholson (5-0 vote). Motion to adjourn made by Trustee Nicholson, seconded by Trustee Slippen (unanimous). No formal action was taken.
●Financial Audit Accepted: The Board received the FY2025 audit report from PKF O'Connor Davies, resulting in an "unmodified (clean) opinion"—the highest possible rating.
●Revenue Performance: The Village generated nearly $23 million in actual revenues, about $1.1 million more than budgeted and a 4% increase over the prior year.
●Expenditure Increase: Spending rose approximately 5% to $20.3 million, driven primarily by a $400,000 increase in health insurance costs and rising retirement benefits.
●Debt Strategy: The Village transferred nearly $4 million from the fund balance to the Capital Projects Fund to pay for improvements upfront rather than issuing debt, saving on interest and issuance fees.
●OPEB Liability: Auditors highlighted a $39 million liability for Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB), a non-cash accounting figure that does not impact the day-to-day budget or bond rating due to state legal restrictions.
Trustees reject biased $36,500 village court study proposal
Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.AI-assisted experimental site — may contain errors. Corrections
Community Discussion
Be the first to comment on this story.
Sent to the editor for review
This is what you asked us to forward to the Village Board:
An editor reads it first. Once it goes, your comment here will show a ✓ Forwarded to the Village Board mark — that is your confirmation.