Type II actions prelim consistency 7-18-11revised
resolution
2 pages
Meeting: portal event 712 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-Type II
Resolution, 2 pages. Attached to agenda item: “PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-Type II”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal.
View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item:
CAF 7-8-11 2
EAF 7-7-11
Memo to VB on Supplementing List of Type II Actions
PB memo to VB
PB memo to VB 7-26-11 recirculation
Resolution recirculating revised law CAF and EAF-Type II
Revised Local Law Type II clean version
Revised Planning Board Resolution clean version
TypeII-VillEngineer
Type II-PolChief
Type II. Neg Dec attachment 1
Type II actions final consistency 10-27-11
Extracted text
CHARLIE KAE
Members
A GALLELLI
STUART GREEBAUM
BRUCE KAUDERER
IA MURTAUGH
Attorney
JAMES STAUDT
Village Engineer
DAIEL O’COOR, P.E.
ROIE ROSE
WATERFRO T ADVISORY COMMITTEE
To:
Mayor Wiegman and the Board of Trustees
From:
Charlie Kane, Waterfront Advisory Committee Chair
CC:
Abe Zambrano
Janine King
Paula DiSanto
Dan O’Connor
WAC Committee
Subject:
Proposed adoption of Local Law Introductory o. 2 of 2011 which would
amend Chapter 116 to supplement the list of Type II actions contained in the
ew York State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulations and
proposed determinations of the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals,
Police Chief, and Village Engineer—Preliminary Consistency Review
Date:
July 18, 2011
On July 18, 2011, the Waterfront Advisory Committee (WAC) reviewed for consistency with the
Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) the above-referenced referral from
the Village Board about the proposed adoption of Local Law Introductory No. 2 of 2011. By a
vote of 3 to 0, the WAC made a preliminary determination of consistency with the LWRP. WAC
members Ms. Gallelli, Mr. Kane, and Mr. Murtaugh were present at the meeting.
The WAC had previously reviewed this referral on April 27, 2011 and had made a preliminary
determination of consistency. At that time, the WAC had recommended that the language related
to “radio communication or microwave transmission facilities” be broadened to be more
inclusive so as to take into consideration future radio, television, telephone, or electronic
communication developments. The WAC notes that such a revision has been made in the
proposed Type II actions. It is because there have been revisions made to the proposed Type II
list of actions by the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Village Board, and Village
Engineer that the WAC again is reviewing this referral for a preliminary determination of
consistency.
The WAC evaluated this referral for consistency in accordance with the LWRP policy standards
and conditions set forth in section 225-6(J) of the Village Code, which are further explained and
described in Section III of the LWRP. The WAC members reviewed the policies in the LWRP
Tel: 914-271-4783
www.crotononhudson-ny.gov
Fax: 914-271-3790
and believe that the policies not specifically listed below are not applicable to this proposed
Local Law and agency resolutions and determinations.
Policy 1A: Existing planning and zoning documents should be reviewed and amended
where necessary to ensure development within the community is consistent with adopted
goals and policies
Policy 6A: To expedite permit procedures, the Village shall coordinate all relevant local
laws into a development package for applicants and/or make all local laws available to
applicants proposing development activities.
The above-mentioned policies are classified as Development Policies in the LWRP, and the WAC
considers them relevant in supporting the proposed law and agency resolutions and
determinations supplementing the list of Type II actions.
The WAC also notes that this action is consistent with the New York State Department of
Conservation’s goals (see NYSDEC SEQR Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2010, Chapter 6 Section E,
Making SEQR More Efficient) to encourage local agencies to add to the statewide Type II list to
streamline the application process for activities where there are no significant environmental
impacts.
Furthermore, the WAC emphasized that placing additional actions on the Type II list does not in
any way limit any boards’ authority to review the action, and any associated potential non-
significant environmental impacts, under any relevant local law including establishing conditions
in any approval that is issued.
It is for the reasons contained in this memorandum that the WAC issues its preliminary
recommendation of consistency.
CK/rr
Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.