croton.news
Croton’s #1 source for AI-generated hyperlocal news
Croton-on-Hudson, New York · Sunday, August 16, 2026· Aug 16, 2026
Source-linkedCorrections welcomed
Documents

Type II actions prelim consistency 7-18-11revised

resolution 2 pages
Meeting: portal event 712 (no meeting page on file)
Agenda item: PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-Type II
Resolution, 2 pages. Attached to agenda item: “PUBLIC HEARING: — Resolution-Type II”
Retrieved 2026-07-31 from the village's meeting portal. View the original PDF ↗
Also attached to this agenda item: CAF 7-8-11 2 EAF 7-7-11 Memo to VB on Supplementing List of Type II Actions PB memo to VB PB memo to VB 7-26-11 recirculation Resolution recirculating revised law CAF and EAF-Type II Revised Local Law Type II clean version Revised Planning Board Resolution clean version TypeII-VillEngineer Type II-PolChief Type II. Neg Dec attachment 1 Type II actions final consistency 10-27-11
CHARLIE KAE Members A GALLELLI STUART GREEBAUM BRUCE KAUDERER IA MURTAUGH Attorney JAMES STAUDT Village Engineer DAIEL O’COOR, P.E. ROIE ROSE WATERFRO T ADVISORY COMMITTEE To: Mayor Wiegman and the Board of Trustees From: Charlie Kane, Waterfront Advisory Committee Chair CC: Abe Zambrano Janine King Paula DiSanto Dan O’Connor WAC Committee Subject: Proposed adoption of Local Law Introductory o. 2 of 2011 which would amend Chapter 116 to supplement the list of Type II actions contained in the ew York State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulations and proposed determinations of the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Police Chief, and Village Engineer—Preliminary Consistency Review Date: July 18, 2011 On July 18, 2011, the Waterfront Advisory Committee (WAC) reviewed for consistency with the Village’s Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) the above-referenced referral from the Village Board about the proposed adoption of Local Law Introductory No. 2 of 2011. By a vote of 3 to 0, the WAC made a preliminary determination of consistency with the LWRP. WAC members Ms. Gallelli, Mr. Kane, and Mr. Murtaugh were present at the meeting. The WAC had previously reviewed this referral on April 27, 2011 and had made a preliminary determination of consistency. At that time, the WAC had recommended that the language related to “radio communication or microwave transmission facilities” be broadened to be more inclusive so as to take into consideration future radio, television, telephone, or electronic communication developments. The WAC notes that such a revision has been made in the proposed Type II actions. It is because there have been revisions made to the proposed Type II list of actions by the Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals, Village Board, and Village Engineer that the WAC again is reviewing this referral for a preliminary determination of consistency. The WAC evaluated this referral for consistency in accordance with the LWRP policy standards and conditions set forth in section 225-6(J) of the Village Code, which are further explained and described in Section III of the LWRP. The WAC members reviewed the policies in the LWRP Tel: 914-271-4783 www.crotononhudson-ny.gov Fax: 914-271-3790 and believe that the policies not specifically listed below are not applicable to this proposed Local Law and agency resolutions and determinations. Policy 1A: Existing planning and zoning documents should be reviewed and amended where necessary to ensure development within the community is consistent with adopted goals and policies Policy 6A: To expedite permit procedures, the Village shall coordinate all relevant local laws into a development package for applicants and/or make all local laws available to applicants proposing development activities. The above-mentioned policies are classified as Development Policies in the LWRP, and the WAC considers them relevant in supporting the proposed law and agency resolutions and determinations supplementing the list of Type II actions. The WAC also notes that this action is consistent with the New York State Department of Conservation’s goals (see NYSDEC SEQR Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2010, Chapter 6 Section E, Making SEQR More Efficient) to encourage local agencies to add to the statewide Type II list to streamline the application process for activities where there are no significant environmental impacts. Furthermore, the WAC emphasized that placing additional actions on the Type II list does not in any way limit any boards’ authority to review the action, and any associated potential non- significant environmental impacts, under any relevant local law including establishing conditions in any approval that is issued. It is for the reasons contained in this memorandum that the WAC issues its preliminary recommendation of consistency. CK/rr

Machine-extracted for search and reference — the original PDF is the authoritative version.

Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.