Tuesday, July 21, 2026 RSS  ·  Calendar
croton.news
Croton’s #1 source for AI-generated hyperlocal news
Croton-on-Hudson, New York
Source-linkedCorrections welcomed

Mexican National Construction Co. v. Reusens — SCOTUS Brief (1885)

SCOTUS Brief on behalf of the Plaintiff in Error, U.S. Reports Vol. 118, p. 49 Passage 33 of 55 226 words

[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] m™% arrest he A od Wood - ogg 4 Y Pleg i SP ig oe te PR Ae RN A ACNE NICO i SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. ) | THE Mexican NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. | Plaintiff in Error. against (FUILLAUME IEUSENS, Defendant in Error. Take notice that upon the annexed affidavit of Michael H. Cardozo, verified the 20th day of March, 1886, we shall move this Honorable Court on Monday the 12th day of April, 1886, at the opening of Court on that day, or as soon there- after as counsel can be heard, for an order requir- | ing the Mexican National Construction Company, the plaintiff in error, to give such other or further security to the defendant in error for the payment of the judgment entered herein in favor of said defendant in error as is required by the rules and practice of this Court, and that if said plain- tiff in error shall fail to give such security that the writ of error herein, be dismissed, and for such other or further relief in the premises as to the Court shall seem proper.

Dated, New York, March 20, 1SS6. Yours, ete., BILLINGS & CARDOZO, Attor neys for Defendant in Error, No, 170 Broadway, New York. To ‘THEODORE F. H. Meyer, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiff in Error, No.

Passages from this source (55)

Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.