Mexican National Construction Co. v. Reusens — SCOTUS Brief (1885)
[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] 32 Nassau Street, foe New York. 5) i HE M EXICAN NATIONAL CONSTRUC- TION C'OMPANY. Plaintiff in Error. agains? (FUILLAUME REUSENS. 6 Defendant in Error. «| S- bie cand or New YorK. lg Southern Distriet of New York. Michael H. Cardozo, being duly sworn, doth depose and say: | am one of the attorneys and of counsel for the defendant in error, and have had continuous charge of this action for him as such attorney and counsel from its commencement. On or about the 6th day of February, ISS4, Guillaume Reusens, the defendant in error, eom- menced an-action at law in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. in and for the City and County of New York, against the Mexican National Construction Company, the plaintiff in error, to recover a sum of money only, to wit. the sum of $25,000 and interest, as for money had and received by the plaintiff in error to the use of the defendant in error. Thereafter, and on or about the said 6th day of February, ISS4. the said defendant in error - obtained a warrant of attachment in due form of law against the property of the said plaintiff in error, in said action in said Supreme Court.