Mexican National Construction Co. v. Reusens — SCOTUS Brief (1885)
[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of New York: said attachment was duly served by the Sheriff of the City and County of 9 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. ae New York, and .the: sum of $30,000 then on deposit in the American Exchange National Bank, in said city, to the credit of said plaintiff in error, was duly levied on by said Sheriff to secure said claim, interest and costs. : On or about the 11th day of February, 1884, said plaintiff in error duly appeared in said action by Theodore F. H. Meyer, as its attorney. On or about the 20th day of February, 1884, the said plaintiff in error served an undertaking for the purpose of discharging said attachment, pur- suant to sections 687 and 68S of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of New York. Said undertaking was executed and delivered by the Fidelity and Casualty Company, of New York, in said undertaking mentioned, pursuant to the provisions of an Act of the Legislature of the State of New.