Tuesday, July 21, 2026 RSS  ·  Calendar
croton.news
Croton’s #1 source for AI-generated hyperlocal news
Croton-on-Hudson, New York
Source-linkedCorrections welcomed

Mexican National Construction Co. v. Reusens — SCOTUS Brief (1885)

SCOTUS Brief on behalf of the Plaintiff in Error, U.S. Reports Vol. 118, p. 49 Passage 39 of 55 181 words

[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] | : : 3 In the month.of January, 1885, said plaintiff in error duly served an answer to said complaint. On or about the third day of June, 1885, said cause was duly called for trial before the Honor- able Hoyt H. Wheeler, sitting as Circuit Judge, and a jury, and the issues of fact and law were duly tried; and thereupon a verdict was duly ren- dered by direction of the Court in favor of said defendant in error and against said plaintiff in error for the sum of $27,708.05. On or about the 12th day of August, 1885, judg- ment was duly entered against the said plaintiff in error for the sum of $28,062.86; and notice thereof was on that day duly served upon the said attorney for said plaintiff in error. On or about the 22nd day of August, 1885, a writ of error was allowed by the Honorable Wil- liam J. Wallace, Cireuit Judge, and a eitation was thereupon issued, directed to said defendant in error, returnable the second Monday in October, 1885.

Passages from this source (55)

Experimental project: croton.news uses AI to generate articles from public records. Content may contain errors. Please report any inaccuracies and check our corrections log.