[Reusens SCOTUS Case (1885)] Wallace.” : 44 Sei Mere - Oo PORAENES CORSO S TSS OO OR RSS NOS SHOES BOOS COT EHO86S 04702 Oee CEOR~ > Sens Oe ae CO MR aes eC OOS e Heal Ores Benes Cenccaneaneneas CLOG Net PAGER SE oie aoe © se Iu the Supreme. Court of the Muited OCTOBER TERM, 1885. t THE MEXICAN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintif/ in Error, ¥ VS. GUILLAUME REUSENS, Defendant in Error. ee eee ee ee er Pee Pee ee ee ee ee SRO HSER HS BOOST AAOOSE OS CO OAS HOE ESE HOSE HSH BE HEE ERE OER AA BOOS OET HOHE ORSOAEAEAEE OPE OO OES COT AEE EH + FOE HEE OES EH OP: v AFFIDAVIT In Op position to Motion for Additional Sec SO. Oe OES 6 ORO CETTE SH ERSTE HEED SESE EEE IESE TOES OOOE OO Re Oe 6 OOOO OOS 8 8 eo OOS eH 6 OE RRE He OS EA + OR ODES COBOL OS SEEDER OTEOED eee er Ore ERS OO ee CEO EEE RE EO OR Oe OOH EO EEE ERE NS OEE SES TEES THEODORE F. H. MEYER® Attorney for Plaintiff in Error, No. 82 Nassau STREsr, JOS. H. CHOATE, Of Cownsel.